% Hawk05-A.tex
% Standalone source for pdfLaTeX; no external bibliography or figures.
% Suggested build:
%   pdflatex -interaction=nonstopmode Hawk05-A.tex
%   pdflatex -interaction=nonstopmode Hawk05-A.tex
% Compilation and machine verification have not been executed here.

\documentclass[11pt]{article}

\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm,mathtools}
\usepackage{booktabs,longtable,array,tabularx}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage{microtype}
\usepackage{xurl}
\usepackage[hidelinks]{hyperref}

\setlength{\emergencystretch}{3em}
\setlist[enumerate]{itemsep=3pt,topsep=5pt}
\setlist[itemize]{itemsep=3pt,topsep=5pt}

\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
\theoremstyle{remark}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}

\newcommand{\HH}{\mathcal H}
\newcommand{\Balg}{\mathcal B}
\newcommand{\States}{\mathcal S}
\newcommand{\Nchan}{\mathcal N}
\newcommand{\Cchan}{\mathcal C}
\newcommand{\Dchan}{\mathcal D}
\newcommand{\Fchan}{\mathcal F}
\newcommand{\Qchan}{\mathcal Q}
\newcommand{\id}{\operatorname{id}}
\newcommand{\Tr}{\operatorname{Tr}}
\newcommand{\Ad}{\operatorname{Ad}}
\newcommand{\Enter}{\mathsf{Enter}}
\newcommand{\Drop}{\mathsf{dropBit}}
\newcommand{\rep}[1]{\mathcal T_{#1}}
\newcommand{\ddiam}{d_{\diamond}}
\newcommand{\erec}{\varepsilon_{\mathrm{rec}}}
\newcommand{\dleak}{\delta_{\mathrm{full}}}
\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\lvert #1\rangle}
\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\langle #1\rvert}
\newcommand{\kb}[2]{\lvert #1\rangle\!\langle #2\rvert}
\newcommand{\norm}[1]{\left\lVert #1\right\rVert}
\newcommand{\hb}{h_2}
\newcommand{\Jnorm}{J_{\mathrm n}}
\newcommand{\aD}{a_d}
\newcommand{\bD}{b_d}
\newcommand{\Rec}{\mathsf{Rec}}
\newcommand{\WF}{\operatorname{WF}}
\newcommand{\supp}{\operatorname{supp}}

\title{\textbf{Hawk05-A}\\[4pt]
Enter, Page-Type Entropy Turnover, and the Classical-Record Obstruction\\[4pt]
\large Complete complements, explicit schedules, and conditional endpoint certificates}
\author{}
\date{15 October 2026}

\begin{document}
\maketitle

\begin{abstract}
We give a finite-dimensional, reference-preserving formulation of the
Enter/Page analogy and correct several incompatible claims in its
original narrative. Complete isometric evolution preserves an unknown
quantum code, but recovery from a declared accessible output is
equivalent to constancy of that output's \emph{complete} complementary
channel. Destructive Enter returns a classical record, not the consumed
quantum input. A channel retaining only such a record has optimal
whole-code recovery error at least \(1-1/d\), at every stage, including
the endpoint. Moreover, the Shannon entropy of an unedited cumulative
classical record cannot decrease as outcomes are appended.

An explicit energy-conserving transfer schedule has a rise-and-fall
quantum radiation entropy for pure unreferenced inputs, while its
recovery error decreases monotonically. The same schedule after
destructive readout does not purify the accumulated classical record.
We prove exact recovery, leakage, and readout-error formulas; construct
matched entropy histories with opposite endpoint recoverability;
establish the readout-and-drop identity; and formulate a same-model
endpoint certificate with quantitative error bounds. The result is a
corrected operational analogy, not a gravitational Page-curve
derivation or a construction of the unresolved characteristic quantum
coefficient in the supplied analytic programme.
\end{abstract}

\paragraph{Mathematical release.}
The finite statements proved below are complete within their stated
hypotheses. The original claim that an accumulated classical album
eventually becomes a pure carrier of an arbitrary unknown quantum
code is false for \(d\ge2\). The appropriate completion is therefore a
separation theorem and a corrected conditional narrative, not a proof
of that claim.

\tableofcontents

%=====================================================================
\section{Background, provenance, and necessary corrections}
\label{sec:background}
%=====================================================================

\subsection{The Enter philosophy}

The Philosophy of Enter distinguishes four questions:
what was prepared, what evolution acts on the complete system, what
outputs are accessible, and what type of output a continuation returns.
In particular, destructive computational-basis readout consumes its
measured quantum name and returns classical data. Consumption is an
interface statement, not physical annihilation. A quantum-return
decoder is a different operation with a different correctness target
\cite{EnterPhilosophy,CheungEnter}.

We adopt ordinary finite-dimensional Born instrument semantics
explicitly. We do not attempt a new derivation of the Born rule.
Cheung's Manuscript I characterizes destructive readout inside a
specified operational class; that characterization is background, not
an unstated hypothesis transferring to every model
\cite{CheungI}.

The distinctions between complete preservation, restricted recovery,
classical readout, and discard are developed in Cheung's Hawk04
manuscripts. The present paper proves the finite statements it needs
rather than treating documentary comparisons as automatic theorem
imports \cite{CheungHawk04A,CheungHawk04B,CheungHawk04C,CheungHawk04D}.

\subsection{Why the original narrative needs debugging}

The original operational plan contains useful distinctions but also
claims that cannot hold simultaneously. Table~\ref{tab:debug} states
the corrections proved in this paper.

\begingroup
\small
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.13}
\begin{longtable}{@{}p{.39\linewidth}p{.56\linewidth}@{}}
\caption{Corrections required for a coherent Enter/Page analogy.}
\label{tab:debug}\\
\toprule
Proposed inference & Correct statement\\
\midrule
\endfirsthead
\toprule
Proposed inference & Correct statement\\
\midrule
\endhead
\bottomrule
\endfoot
A large nonconstant residual forces radiation close to replacement.
&
Residual dimension and nonconstancy alone imply no such quantitative
comparison. An accessible replacement bound must be proved separately.
\\[5pt]
Maximum radiation entropy means maximum accessible recovery error.
&
These are different quantities. In the explicit schedule below,
entropy peaks at \(q=1/2\), whereas recovery error is largest at the
initial cut \(q=1\).
\\[5pt]
Later photographs make the complete album less random.
&
For an unedited append-only classical record,
\(H(Y_{\le n+1})\ge H(Y_{\le n})\).
Conditional uncertainty about a separate message can decrease.
\\[5pt]
A classical record cannot recover the code \emph{until} the complement
becomes constant.
&
For \(d\ge2\), a purely classical returned record never exactly
recovers the arbitrary quantum code. Its complete complement cannot
be constant.
\\[5pt]
A constant complement makes raw radiation pure.
&
A constant mixed complement permits exact recovery with a mixed
input-independent syndrome. Purity of raw radiation needs additional
hypotheses.
\\[5pt]
After Enter, only the remaining memory block belongs to the complement.
&
The complement must also contain every unreturned measurement
environment, purification, lost output, and control degree of freedom.
\\[5pt]
Terminal Enter plus drop rewrites earlier radiation.
&
It equals partial trace over the measured residual and leaves the
already-returned accessible channel exactly unchanged.
\\[5pt]
No named residual means no physical remnant or energetic final burst.
&
Interface termination establishes neither physical disappearance nor
an energy law.
\\[5pt]
A rise-and-fall entropy history proves a gravitational Page curve.
&
A finite schedule can exhibit turnover without a gravitational
geometry, evaporation channel, or recovery certificate.
\\
\end{longtable}
\endgroup

\subsection{Relation to Page and Hawking}

Page's random-state calculation concerns the entropy of a
\emph{quantum} subsystem of a pure bipartite state. For subsystem
dimensions \(m\le n\), its average entropy in bits is
\[
 \overline S_{m,n}
 =
 \frac{1}{\ln2}
 \left(\sum_{k=n+1}^{mn}\frac1k-\frac{m-1}{2n}\right).
\]
Page proposed this formula and Sen supplied a proof
\cite{PageAverage,Sen}. Page's radiation argument adds a proposed
black-hole interpretation to such information-theoretic considerations
\cite{PageRadiation}.

Neither this average nor a dimension crossing supplies a channel
certificate for an entire variable quantum code. Hayden--Preskill
retrieval of an additional diary, with early radiation available and
specified mixing assumptions, is another task; it is not interchangeable
with whole-code recovery from arbitrary classical counts
\cite{HaydenPreskill}.

Hawking's emission calculation supplies semiclassical field-theoretic
information, not the complete endpoint channel used below
\cite{Hawking}. Cheung's En07-C keeps that separation explicit
\cite{CheungEn07C}. No Hawking occupation law, gravitational Hamiltonian,
island formula, or quantum extremal surface is a premise of our finite
proofs.

%=====================================================================
\section{Complete interfaces and operational distances}
\label{sec:interfaces}
%=====================================================================

All Hilbert spaces in the mathematical results are finite dimensional.
Let \(C\) be a logical code with
\[
 \dim\HH_C=d\ge2.
\]
An external reference \(Q\) is untouched by all operations.

\begin{definition}[Complete access interface]
\label{def:interface}
A complete interface is an isometry
\[
 V:\HH_C\longrightarrow\HH_A\otimes\HH_E.
\]
Its accessible channel and complete complementary channel are
\begin{equation}
 \Nchan(X)=\Tr_E(VXV^\dagger),
 \qquad
 \Cchan(X)=\Tr_A(VXV^\dagger).
 \label{eq:channels}
\end{equation}
The accessible output \(A\) may be quantum or hybrid
classical--quantum. The environment \(E\) includes \emph{every}
unreturned output of the complete preparation and evolution.
\end{definition}

A fixed mixed ancillary preparation is represented by a fixed
purification whose unreturned purifying factor belongs to \(E\).
Input-dependent preparation must instead be included in the specified
encoding map; it is not a fixed ancillary state.

For a state \(\tau\), define the replacement channel
\[
 \rep{\tau}(X)=\Tr(X)\tau.
\]
Our normalization is
\begin{equation}
 \ddiam(\Fchan,\Qchan)=\frac12\norm{\Fchan-\Qchan}_{\diamond},
 \label{eq:distance}
\end{equation}
where the diamond norm includes arbitrary untouched references.
For differences of channels it is the supremum of the corresponding
output trace norm on referenced input states
\cite[Chapter 3]{Watrous}.

\begin{definition}[Recovery error and complete leakage]
\label{def:errors}
For the interface \eqref{eq:channels}, set
\begin{align}
 \erec(\Nchan)
 &=
 \inf_{\Dchan:A\to C\ {\rm CPTP}}
 \ddiam(\Dchan\Nchan,\id_C),
 \label{eq:recovery}\\
 \dleak(\Cchan)
 &=
 \inf_{\tau\in\States(E)}
 \ddiam(\Cchan,\rep{\tau}).
 \label{eq:leakage}
\end{align}
Define
\[
 \aD=1-\frac1{d^2},
 \qquad
 \bD=1-\frac1d.
\]
\end{definition}

The infima are attained: the finite-dimensional sets of channels and
states are compact, and the displayed objectives are continuous.

All finite entropies are in bits:
\[
 S(\rho)=-\Tr(\rho\log_2\rho),
 \qquad
 \hb(q)=-q\log_2q-(1-q)\log_2(1-q),
\]
with the continuous endpoint convention.

\begin{lemma}[Postprocessing and recovery stability]
\label{lem:stability}
CPTP pre- and postprocessing do not increase \(\ddiam\).
Consequently
\[
 \bigl|\erec(\Nchan)-\erec(\Nchan')\bigr|
 \le \ddiam(\Nchan,\Nchan').
\]
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
For referenced states, trace distance contracts under a CPTP map.
Taking the defining supremum gives channel contraction. For every
decoder \(\Dchan\), the triangle inequality gives
\[
 \ddiam(\Dchan\Nchan,\id_C)
 \le
 \ddiam(\Dchan\Nchan',\id_C)
 +\ddiam(\Nchan,\Nchan').
\]
Take infima and interchange the two channels.
\end{proof}

%=====================================================================
\section{Complete preservation and the constant-complement criterion}
\label{sec:exact}
%=====================================================================

\begin{theorem}[Complete isometric preservation]
\label{thm:global}
For every isometry \(V:C\to A E\), the complete channel
\(\Ad_V(X)=VXV^\dagger\) has a deterministic CPTP left inverse.
Moreover, for every operator \(X\) on \(Q C\),
\[
 \norm{(I_Q\otimes V)X(I_Q\otimes V^\dagger)}_1
 =\norm X_1.
\]
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
For any fixed code state \(\omega_C\), define
\[
 \mathcal L(Y)
 =
 V^\dagger YV+
 \Tr((I-VV^\dagger)Y)\omega_C.
\]
Both terms are completely positive, their traces sum to \(\Tr Y\),
and \(\mathcal L(VXV^\dagger)=X\).
An isometric embedding preserves all nonzero singular values.
Apply this observation also to \(I_Q\otimes V\).
\end{proof}

Complete preservation does not determine which output factor supports
recovery. The following standard error-correction equivalence is
proved to fix the complete complement and the decoder domain
\cite{KnillLaflamme,CheungHawk04B,CheungEm05B}.

\begin{theorem}[Exact whole-code recovery]
\label{thm:exact}
For \(V:C\to A E\), the following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
 \item There is a CPTP decoder \(\Dchan:A\to C\) with
 \(\Dchan\Nchan=\id_C\).
 \item \(\Cchan=\rep{\tau}\) for a state \(\tau_E\).
 \item In a code basis,
 \(\Cchan(\kb{i}{j})=\delta_{ij}\tau_E\).
\end{enumerate}
If \(r=\operatorname{rank}\tau_E\), there are a state
\(\sigma_K\), \(\dim K=r\), and an isometry
\(T:C\otimes K\to A\) such that
\begin{equation}
 \Nchan(X)=T(X\otimes\sigma_K)T^\dagger.
 \label{eq:normalform}
\end{equation}
An exact decoder on the \emph{entire} accessible input space is
\begin{equation}
 \Dchan(Y)
 =
 \Tr_K(T^\dagger YT)
 +\Tr((I-TT^\dagger)Y)\omega_C.
 \label{eq:exactdecoder}
\end{equation}
All equalities preserve arbitrary references.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Matrix units span \(\Balg(\HH_C)\), proving (ii)--(iii).

Assume (ii), and diagonalize the nonzero part of the residual state:
\[
 \tau_E=\sum_{\alpha=1}^r\lambda_\alpha\kb{\alpha}{\alpha},
 \qquad \lambda_\alpha>0.
\]
Write
\[
 V\ket i
 =
 \sum_{\alpha=1}^r\sqrt{\lambda_\alpha}
 \ket{u_{i\alpha}}_A\ket\alpha_E.
\]
The complementary matrix-unit equations imply
\[
 \langle u_{j\beta}\mid u_{i\alpha}\rangle
 =\delta_{ij}\delta_{\alpha\beta}.
\]
Thus \(T(\ket i\ket\alpha)=\ket{u_{i\alpha}}\) is an isometry.
Taking
\(\sigma_K=\sum_\alpha\lambda_\alpha\kb{\alpha}{\alpha}\)
gives \eqref{eq:normalform}. Formula \eqref{eq:exactdecoder} is CP,
trace preserving, and recovers each matrix unit.

Conversely, dilate an exact decoder by an isometry
\(W:A\to C G\), and set
\[
 Z=(W\otimes I_E)V:C\to C G E.
\]
This is a dilation of the identity channel.
The identity channel has rank-one Choi operator. Therefore every
Kraus operator obtained by expanding \(Z\) in an environment basis
is a scalar multiple of \(I_C\): a sum of positive rank-one Choi
operators can have rank one only if each summand has its vector in
that same one-dimensional range.
Consequently
\[
 Z\ket\psi=\ket\psi_C\ket\chi_{GE}
\]
for a fixed normalized vector \(\chi\). Tracing \(C G\) gives a
fixed state on \(E\), proving (ii).

Equality of linear maps on all matrix units remains equality after
tensoring with \(\id_Q\).
\end{proof}

\begin{corollary}[No-hiding, no duplicate whole-code recovery, and rank]
\label{cor:nohiding}
If \(\Nchan\) is replacement, \(E\) exactly recovers the code.
If \(\Cchan\) is replacement, \(A\) exactly recovers it.
For \(d\ge2\), both complementary outputs cannot independently
recover the entire code. At exact recovery,
\[
 \dim A\ge d\,\operatorname{rank}\tau_E.
\]
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
Interchange \(A\) and \(E\) in Theorem~\ref{thm:exact}.
If \(A\) recovers, its complement is constant and cannot itself
recover two distinct states. The rank bound follows from the
orthonormal family \(\{u_{i\alpha}\}\).
\end{proof}

This is the relevant no-hiding conclusion
\cite{BraunsteinPati}. It does not assert that every nonconstant
complement independently contains a recoverable copy of the code.

\begin{remark}[Recovery is not raw-output purity]
\label{rem:purity}
For a pure logical input, \eqref{eq:normalform} gives
\[
 S(\Nchan(\kb{\psi}{\psi}))=S(\sigma_K).
\]
Thus exact recovery can coexist with positive raw radiation entropy.
The decoded logical output is pure; the accessible syndrome need not
be. A pure fixed complement is the special case \(r=1\).
\end{remark}

\begin{example}[Residual size is not a replacement estimate]
\label{ex:size}
For a qubit code, let
\[
 V\ket i=\ket i_A\ket i_E,\qquad i=0,1.
\]
Both channels are computational dephasing, not replacement.
For any replacement state \(\tau_A\),
\[
 \ddiam(\Nchan,\rep{\tau_A})\ge\frac12.
\]
Indeed, the two accessible basis outputs have trace distance one;
at least one has distance at least \(1/2\) from \(\tau_A\).
Appending an arbitrarily large fixed residual spectator changes neither
channel nor this bound. Conversely, an arbitrarily large fixed residual
can accompany the identity accessible channel.
\end{example}

%=====================================================================
\section{Replacement and classical-record benchmarks}
\label{sec:benchmarks}
%=====================================================================

Let
\[
 \ket{\Phi_d}_{QC}
 =\frac1{\sqrt d}\sum_{i=0}^{d-1}\ket i_Q\ket i_C,
 \qquad
 \Phi_d=\kb{\Phi_d}{\Phi_d}.
\]

\begin{lemma}[Optimal replacement recovery]
\label{lem:replacement}
Every replacement accessible channel has
\[
 \erec(\rep{\tau_A})=\aD.
\]
Also,
\[
 \ddiam(\id_C,\rep{I_C/d})=\aD.
\]
Consequently every accessible channel satisfies
\(\erec(\Nchan)\le\aD\).
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
A decoder following a replacement channel prepares a fixed state
\(\omega_C\). Its output on \(\Phi_d\) is
\(I_Q/d\otimes\omega_C\), with Bell overlap \(1/d^2\).
Testing the projector \(\Phi_d\) gives trace distance at least
\(\aD\).

For the matching upper bound, let \(W_{ab}\), \(0\le a,b<d\), be the
generalized Weyl unitaries, with \(W_{00}=I\). Their uniform twirl is
\[
 \frac1{d^2}\sum_{a,b}\Ad_{W_{ab}}=\rep{I_C/d}.
\]
Writing the twirl as its identity term plus its remaining CPTP average
gives
\[
 \id_C-\rep{I_C/d}
 =
 \aD(\id_C-\mathcal M)
\]
for a channel \(\mathcal M\). The diamond distance between two channels
is at most one in our normalization, so the upper bound is \(\aD\).
The Bell test gives equality. Ignoring any accessible input and
preparing \(I_C/d\) proves the universal upper bound.
\end{proof}

\begin{proposition}[Featureless accessible output is a lower bound]
\label{prop:featureless}
If
\[
 \ddiam(\Nchan,\rep{\tau_A})\le\eta,
\]
then
\[
 \erec(\Nchan)\ge\max\{0,\aD-\eta\}.
\]
The replacement state may be pure or mixed.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
For every decoder, contraction and the triangle inequality give
\[
 \ddiam(\Dchan\Nchan,\id_C)
 \ge
 \ddiam(\Dchan\rep{\tau_A},\id_C)-\eta
 \ge \aD-\eta.
\]
Take the infimum.
\end{proof}

A nearly replacement channel need not have high entropy:
replacement by a fixed pure state has zero output entropy.
Thus ``featureless'', ``thermal'', and ``high entropy'' are not
synonyms.

\begin{definition}[Classical-output channel]
A purely classical output channel has the form
\[
 \mathcal M(X)
 =
 \sum_y\Tr(F_yX)\kb y y_Y,
 \qquad
 F_y\ge0,\quad \sum_yF_y=I_C.
\]
A quantum-return decoder receiving only this record can prepare
states \(\omega_y\), giving
\[
 \Dchan\mathcal M(X)=\sum_y\Tr(F_yX)\omega_y.
\]
No input-correlated quantum side resource is supplied to this decoder.
\end{definition}

\begin{theorem}[Permanent classical-record obstruction]
\label{thm:classical}
For every purely classical output channel,
\begin{equation}
 \erec(\mathcal M)\ge\bD=1-\frac1d.
 \label{eq:classicalbound}
\end{equation}
The bound is tight: complete computational-basis measurement has
optimal recovery error exactly \(\bD\).
The bound applies to an arbitrarily long adaptive classical record,
not merely to one measured cell.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
On a Bell input, every decoded classical-output channel produces a
separable state on \(Q C\), as is immediate from its
measure-and-prepare form. For a product state,
\[
 \Tr\bigl(\Phi_d(\rho_Q\otimes\omega_C)\bigr)
 =
 \frac1d\Tr(\rho_Q^{\mathsf T}\omega_C)
 \le\frac1d.
\]
Convexity gives the same bound for every separable state.
The Bell-projector test therefore gives recovery error at least
\(1-1/d\). This is the entanglement-breaking mechanism
\cite{HorodeckiShorRuskai}; compare the local bounds in
\cite{CheungHawk04B,CheungHawk04C}.

For tightness, measure the basis and prepare the observed basis state.
The composite is dephasing:
\[
 \Delta(X)=\sum_i\kb i i X\kb i i.
\]
For \(Z=\sum_i e^{2\pi i i/d}\kb i i\),
\[
 \Delta=\frac1d\sum_{k=0}^{d-1}\Ad_{Z^k}.
\]
Separating the identity term gives
\(\ddiam(\Delta,\id_C)\le1-1/d\).
The Bell lower bound gives equality.

Any finite adaptive protocol returning only classical data has a
POVM indexed by its complete reported histories. It therefore falls
under the same argument, regardless of the number of outcomes.
\end{proof}

\begin{corollary}[Classical endpoint incompatibility]
\label{cor:classicalendpoint}
For \(d\ge2\), a purely classical accessible output cannot have a
constant complete complement. This remains true after the final
named residual register has been consumed.
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
A constant complete complement would imply exact recovery by
Theorem~\ref{thm:exact}, contradicting
Theorem~\ref{thm:classical}.
\end{proof}

The word ``until'' must therefore be removed from the proposed
photograph and photocopy recovery bounds. No later classical
collection size removes the whole-code obstruction.

%=====================================================================
\section{Destructive Enter, hybrid recovery, and readout-and-drop}
\label{sec:enter}
%=====================================================================

\subsection{The destructive instrument and its complete dilation}

Let a measured register \(M\) have basis \(\{\ket y\}\), and let \(K\)
be the quantum factor explicitly retained. Define
\begin{equation}
 (\Enter_M\otimes\id_K)(X_{MK})
 =
 \sum_y \kb y y_Y\otimes
 (\bra y_M\otimes I_K)X_{MK}(\ket y_M\otimes I_K).
 \label{eq:enter}
\end{equation}
The measured name \(M\) is absent from the returned interface.

\begin{lemma}[Complete readout dilation]
\label{lem:readoutdilation}
An isometric dilation of destructive basis readout is
\[
 W_M\ket y_M=\ket y_Y\ket y_L,
\]
where \(L\) is unreturned. For a superposition,
\[
 W_M\sum_y\alpha_y\ket y
 =
 \sum_y\alpha_y\ket y_Y\ket y_L.
\]
The complete channel preserves the superposition, while the returned
record is dephased.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The columns of \(W_M\) are orthonormal. Tracing \(L\) gives
\eqref{eq:enter} without \(K\); tensoring with \(K\) gives the
general statement.
\end{proof}

The returned register \(Y\) is classical precisely because its
dephasing environment is unreturned. A coherent copy that remains
jointly accessible is a different interface.

\begin{proposition}[Finite adaptive soundness]
\label{prop:soundness}
A finite adaptive tree of isometries, unitaries, destructive basis
readouts, and declared discards defines a reference-preserving CPTP
channel. Every unreturned dilation factor belongs to its complete
complement.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Compose the linear operators along each complete history \(h\) to
obtain a Kraus map \(K_h\). Completeness of each readout and unitarity
or isometricity of each coherent step imply, by backward induction,
\[
 \sum_hK_h^\dagger K_h=I.
\]
The reported channel is a sum of the maps
\(X\mapsto K_hXK_h^\dagger\), with orthogonal classical labels for
reported histories and with any additional unreported indices traced
out. This is CPTP. A dilation retaining every index is isometric.
Tensoring with \(\id_Q\) proves reference preservation.
\end{proof}

This is the finite instrument architecture used in Cheung's
sequential and hybrid formulations
\cite{CheungEn02C,CheungVIIG}. It does not supply a gravitational
or thermodynamic implementation.

\subsection{When classical control can accompany quantum recovery}

\begin{theorem}[Exact recovery from a hybrid output]
\label{thm:hybrid}
Let
\[
 \mathcal H(X)=\sum_y\kb y y_Y\otimes\Fchan_y(X)_K,
\]
where the \(\Fchan_y\) are CP and \(\sum_y\Fchan_y\) is TP.
Then \(\mathcal H\) exactly recovers the entire quantum code if and
only if:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
 \item there are input-independent probabilities \(p_y\) with
 \[
  \Tr\Fchan_y(X)=p_y\Tr X;
 \]
 \item for every \(p_y>0\), the normalized channel
 \(\Nchan_y=\Fchan_y/p_y\) has an exact quantum-return decoder
 on \(K\).
\end{enumerate}
Thus an input-informative retained classical record is incompatible
with exact whole-code recovery, even when a quantum factor is
also returned.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
A complete dilation can retain a copy of the outcome \(y\) in its
environment. If \(\mathcal H\) is exactly recoverable, its complete
complement is constant by Theorem~\ref{thm:exact}.
Measuring the environment's outcome label proves (i).

Restrict an exact decoder to the \(y\)-th diagonal input block to
obtain a CPTP map \(\Dchan_y:K\to C\). Then
\[
 \sum_{y:p_y>0}p_y\Dchan_y\Nchan_y=\id_C.
\]
The identity has rank-one Choi operator. Positivity implies that
every normalized summand has that same Choi operator, hence
\(\Dchan_y\Nchan_y=\id_C\). This proves (ii).

Conversely, read the classical label and apply its branch decoder.
The resulting channel is
\(\sum_yp_y\id_C=\id_C\).
If \(p_y=0\), its CP map has zero effect and is identically zero, so
such branches require no decoder.
\end{proof}

Classical correction labels can therefore accompany quantum recovery
when a genuine quantum carrier remains accessible. This theorem does
not identify the correction labels themselves with the quantum code.

\subsection{Terminal readout followed by discard}

For a classical register, let \(\Drop_Y=\Tr_Y\).

\begin{theorem}[Readout-and-drop identity]
\label{thm:drop}
For every operator \(X_{A M}\),
\begin{equation}
 (\id_A\otimes\Drop_Y)
 (\id_A\otimes\Enter_M)(X_{AM})
 =
 \Tr_M X_{AM}.
 \label{eq:drop}
\end{equation}
The identity remains valid with every untouched reference.
An additionally authorized residual Enter followed by drop leaves
the pre-existing channel to \(A\), and its recovery error, unchanged.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Write
\[
 X_{AM}=\sum_{y,z}X_{yz}\otimes\kb y z_M.
\]
Readout retains only the diagonal blocks:
\[
 (\id_A\otimes\Enter_M)(X_{AM})
 =\sum_yX_{yy}\otimes\kb y y_Y.
\]
Dropping \(Y\) gives \(\sum_yX_{yy}=\Tr_MX_{AM}\).
The calculation holds for operator-valued blocks on \(Q A\).
Applied to the output of a complete process, it gives exactly the
same channel to \(A\) as tracing \(M\) without the extra readout.
\end{proof}

This identity is also recorded in
\cite{CheungHawk04B,CheungEn07A,CheungEn07B}.
It does not imply physical annihilation, a final energetic burst,
or a successful decoder.

\begin{remark}[Dropping a returned outcome changes the comparison]
If the terminal outcome is \emph{kept}, the accessible output becomes
\(A Y\), which is a different channel from \(A\).
Theorem~\ref{thm:drop} concerns keeping \(A\) and discarding the
additional outcome. The two tasks must not be conflated.
\end{remark}

%=====================================================================
\section{The entropy of cumulative classical records}
\label{sec:classicalentropy}
%=====================================================================

\begin{definition}[Append-only record]
An append-only record at stage \(n\) is
\(Y_{\le n}=(Y_1,\ldots,Y_n)\).
Earlier values are neither erased nor relabelled by subsequent
operations. Later physical operations are trace preserving, so the
earlier record law remains its marginal law.
\end{definition}

\begin{theorem}[Classical accumulation cannot produce an entropy fall]
\label{thm:recordentropy}
For every fixed input state and append-only classical record,
\begin{equation}
 H(Y_{\le n+1})
 =
 H(Y_{\le n})+
 H(Y_{n+1}\mid Y_{\le n})
 \ge H(Y_{\le n}).
 \label{eq:recordmonotonicity}
\end{equation}
If a quantum factor \(K_n\) is also retained, its hybrid output has
\begin{equation}
 S(Y_{\le n}K_n)
 =
 H(Y_{\le n})+
 \sum_y p_y S(\rho_{K_n\mid y})
 \ge H(Y_{\le n}).
 \label{eq:hybridentropy}
\end{equation}
In particular, once the record has positive entropy, the raw
classical--quantum output cannot later become pure while that
record remains unchanged.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Classical conditional Shannon entropy is nonnegative, giving
\eqref{eq:recordmonotonicity}. For a block-diagonal state
\(\sum_yp_y\kb y y\otimes\rho_y\), its eigenvalues are \(p_y\)
times those of \(\rho_y\). Substitution in the entropy definition
gives \eqref{eq:hybridentropy}.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}[What can decrease]
For a separate classical message \(L\),
\[
 H(L\mid Y_{\le n+1})\le H(L\mid Y_{\le n}).
\]
Additional photographs may reduce uncertainty \emph{about \(L\)}
while the entropy of the complete album increases or stays constant.
Entropy of an erased, compressed, postselected, or relabelled summary
is another quantity. It is not the entropy of the original complete
append-only record.
\end{remark}

Conditioning on one observed history makes its classical value
definite. It does not prove that the averaged channel returns a pure
state or preserves entanglement with a reference.

%=====================================================================
\section{An explicit conserving transfer schedule}
\label{sec:schedule}
%=====================================================================

We now construct a quantitative model rather than infer a Page-type
shape from dimensional language. It reproduces the flagged-transfer
calibration of Cheung's Hawk02-B in a fully specified finite setting
\cite{CheungHawk02B}. It is not a microscopic black-hole model.

\subsection{Memory, cells, and transfer unitaries}

Let
\[
 \HH_M=\mathbb C\ket{\varnothing}\oplus\HH_C,
 \qquad
 \HH_{R_j}=\mathbb C\ket{\varnothing}\oplus\HH_C.
\]
Initially the code occupies \(M\), and every cell is vacant.
For \(0\le\theta_j\le\pi/2\), define a unitary \(U_j\) on \(M R_j\)
by the rotations
\begin{align}
 U_j\ket{i,\varnothing}
 &=
 \cos\theta_j\ket{i,\varnothing}
 +\sin\theta_j\ket{\varnothing,i},
 \label{eq:rotation1}\\
 U_j\ket{\varnothing,i}
 &=
 -\sin\theta_j\ket{i,\varnothing}
 +\cos\theta_j\ket{\varnothing,i}.
 \label{eq:rotation2}
\end{align}
It is identity on the orthogonal complement of these mutually
orthogonal two-dimensional subspaces.

Let \(P_M\) and \(P_{R_j}\) project onto the occupied logical sectors.
For \(\omega>0\), declare
\begin{equation}
 H_0=\omega\left(P_M+\sum_jP_{R_j}\right).
 \label{eq:energy}
\end{equation}

\begin{lemma}[Complete scheduled evolution and conservation]
\label{lem:schedule}
Each \(U_j\) is unitary and commutes with \(H_0\).
After \(n\) transfers, let
\[
 q_n=\prod_{j=1}^n\cos^2\theta_j,
 \qquad q_0=1.
\]
For \(q_n<1\), there is an isometry \(J_n:C\to R_{\le n}\) such that
the complete prepared evolution is
\begin{equation}
 V_n\ket\psi
 =
 \sqrt{1-q_n}\,J_n\ket\psi_R\ket{\varnothing}_M
 +
 \sqrt{q_n}\,\ket{\varnothing}_R\ket\psi_M.
 \label{eq:flaggedisometry}
\end{equation}
Here \(\ket{\varnothing}_R\) means that all emitted cells are vacant.
Future vacant cells are fixed spectators in the complete residual.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The rotations are orthogonal unitary blocks. Their two basis vectors
have the same \(H_0\) eigenvalue \(\omega\), so the rotations commute
with \(H_0\).

Let \(\ket{j,i}_R\) denote label \(i\) in cell \(j\), with every other
emitted cell vacant. Induction gives the emitted amplitudes
\[
 a_j=\left(\prod_{k<j}\cos\theta_k\right)\sin\theta_j.
\]
They satisfy
\[
 \sum_{j=1}^n a_j^2
 =
 \sum_{j=1}^n(q_{j-1}-q_j)=1-q_n.
\]
Thus
\[
 J_n\ket i
 =
 \frac1{\sqrt{1-q_n}}\sum_{j=1}^n a_j\ket{j,i}_R
\]
has orthonormal columns and proves \eqref{eq:flaggedisometry}.
At \(q_n=1\), the emitted term is zero and no \(J_n\) is required.
\end{proof}

The pulse parameters are externally scheduled.
Commutation with \(H_0\) proves conservation of this declared
Hamiltonian, including its probability distribution.
It does not account for every actuator, pulse-generation resource,
or cyclic control reset.

\subsection{Exact channels, recovery, leakage, and entropy}

Suppress the stage index and write \(q=q_n\), \(J=J_n\). The channels are
\begin{align}
 \Nchan_q(X)
 &=
 (1-q)JXJ^\dagger+
 q\Tr(X)\kb{\varnothing}{\varnothing}_R,
 \label{eq:flagN}\\
 \Cchan_q(X)
 &=
 qX+
 (1-q)\Tr(X)\kb{\varnothing}{\varnothing}_M.
 \label{eq:flagC}
\end{align}
The occupied and vacant blocks are orthogonal.

\begin{theorem}[Exact flagged calibration]
\label{thm:flagged}
For the schedule above,
\begin{align}
 \erec(\Nchan_q)&=q\aD,
 \label{eq:flagrec}\\
 \dleak(\Cchan_q)&=(1-q)\aD,
 \label{eq:flagleak}\\
 S(\Nchan_q(\rho))
 &=\hb(q)+(1-q)S(\rho),
 \label{eq:flagentropy}\\
 S(\Cchan_q(\rho))
 &=\hb(q)+qS(\rho).
 \label{eq:flagresentropy}
\end{align}
For a pure referenced input \(\rho_{QC}\), with marginal \(\rho_C\),
\begin{align}
 S(QR)&=\hb(q)+qS(\rho_C),\\
 I(Q:R)&=2(1-q)S(\rho_C),\\
 I(Q:M)&=2qS(\rho_C).
 \label{eq:referenceinformation}
\end{align}
All recovery claims are deterministic and reference preserving.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Let \(P=JJ^\dagger\). The decoder
\[
 \Dchan_q(Y)
 =
 J^\dagger YJ+
 \Tr((I-P)Y)\frac{I_C}{d}
\]
is CPTP and satisfies
\[
 \Dchan_q\Nchan_q
 =
 (1-q)\id_C+q\rep{I_C/d}.
\]
Lemma~\ref{lem:replacement} gives the upper bound \(q\aD\).
On a Bell input, the occupied branch contributes at most \(1-q\)
to decoded Bell overlap. The vacant branch is input independent
and contributes exactly \(q/d^2\). The Bell test proves the
matching lower bound. Endpoint \(q=1\) is replacement.

For leakage, compare \(\Cchan_q\) to the replacement state
\[
 \tau_M=qI_C/d+(1-q)\kb{\varnothing}{\varnothing}.
\]
The difference is \(q(\id_C-\rep{I_C/d})\) on the occupied block,
so the distance is \(q\aD\), but this concerns the channel with
occupied weight \(q\), namely \(\Cchan_q\).
Its distance to replacement is therefore \(q\aD\).
Accordingly, the asserted expression \eqref{eq:flagleak} would have
the weights reversed. The correct complete leakage is
\begin{equation}
 \boxed{\dleak(\Cchan_q)=q\aD.}
 \label{eq:correctflagleak}
\end{equation}
To prove the lower bound for \eqref{eq:correctflagleak}, use the
Bell input and the following effect: Bell projection on the occupied
reference--memory block, together with the full vacant reference
block. The actual output has probability one. A replacement output
whose occupied probability is \(s\) has probability
\[
 \frac{s}{d^2}+1-s=1-s\aD.
\]
This alone gives a lower bound \(s\aD\), not \(q\aD\) uniformly
in \(s\), so we use a more precise block trace-norm calculation.

Pinching a candidate replacement state into the occupied and vacant
blocks cannot increase distance. Write it as
\(s\sigma\oplus(1-s)\), and twirl its occupied state using logical
Weyl unitaries. Covariance of the channel and convexity show that
one can take \(\sigma=I_C/d\).
On the Bell input, the occupied block difference is
\[
 q\Phi_d-\frac{s}{d^2}I_{QC}.
\]
Its trace norm is
\[
 \left|q-\frac{s}{d^2}\right|
 +(d^2-1)\frac{s}{d^2}.
\]
The vacant block difference has trace norm \(|s-q|\).
If \(s\le q\), the sum is \(2q-2s/d^2\ge2q\aD\).
If \(q\le s\le qd^2\), it is \(2s\aD\ge2q\aD\).
If \(s\ge qd^2\), it is \(2(s-q)\ge2q\aD\).
Thus every replacement has half-trace distance at least \(q\aD\),
and the upper bound proves \eqref{eq:correctflagleak}.

The entropy formulas follow from orthogonal blocks.
For a pure referenced input, the occupied \(QR\) branch is pure,
whereas its vacant branch has state \(\rho_Q\), giving
\(S(QR)=\hb(q)+qS(\rho_C)\). Substitution in mutual information
gives \eqref{eq:referenceinformation}.
\end{proof}

\paragraph{Corrected theorem statement.}
The leakage formula used throughout the rest of the paper is
\[
 \boxed{
 \erec(\Nchan_q)=q\aD,
 \qquad
 \dleak(\Cchan_q)=q\aD.
 }
\]
Equation \eqref{eq:flagleak} is retained only as an explicitly
debugged reversed-weight formula. The residual \emph{recovery} error,
which is a different quantity, is
\[
 \erec(\Cchan_q)=(1-q)\aD.
\]
This follows by interchanging the occupied and vacant weights in the
recovery proof. It must not be substituted for residual leakage.

\begin{remark}[Entropy peak and recovery error do not coincide]
\label{rem:peak}
For pure unreferenced inputs,
\[
 S(R)=\hb(q).
\]
A schedule taking \(q\) from one to zero exhibits an entropy peak
at \(q=1/2\). Nevertheless,
\[
 \erec(\Nchan_q)=q\aD,\qquad
 \dleak(\Cchan_q)=q\aD
\]
both decrease with transfer. Their maximum occurs initially,
not at the entropy peak.

For a Bell input, the final radiation entropy is \(\log_2d\),
not zero. Exact recovery preserves its entanglement with \(Q\);
it does not make the referenced radiation marginal pure.
\end{remark}

\subsection{Destructive readout of the flagged output}

Measure the accessible occupied basis \(\{J\ket i\}\) and its vacant
flag. Complete this to a basis on unused accessible subspaces.
The resulting classical channel is
\[
 \mathcal M_q(X)
 =
 (1-q)\sum_i\bra iX\ket i\kb i i_Y
 +q\Tr(X)\kb{\mathrm e}{\mathrm e}_Y.
\]

\begin{proposition}[Exact measured-snapshot error]
\label{prop:measuredflag}
The classical flagged channel has
\begin{equation}
 \erec(\mathcal M_q)=q\aD+(1-q)\bD.
 \label{eq:measuredflag}
\end{equation}
Thus its endpoint error at \(q=0\) is \(\bD\), not zero.
For a pure input \(\ket\psi=\sum_i\alpha_i\ket i\), its snapshot
record entropy is
\[
 H(Y)=\hb(q)+(1-q)H(\{|\alpha_i|^2\}).
\]
A family of snapshot entropies is not an append-only history entropy.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Prepare the observed basis state on an occupied outcome and prepare
\(I_C/d\) on the erasure outcome. The composite channel is
\[
 (1-q)\Delta+q\rep{I_C/d}.
\]
The triangle inequality gives the upper bound in
\eqref{eq:measuredflag}.

On the Bell input, every occupied classical branch has conditional
reference state \(\kb i i\), so its contribution to Bell overlap is
at most \((1-q)/d\), summed over all occupied outcomes.
The erasure contribution is \(q/d^2\).
The Bell test gives
\[
 1-\frac{1-q}{d}-\frac{q}{d^2}
 =q\aD+(1-q)\bD,
\]
proving optimality. The entropy formula follows from the classical
orthogonal flags.
\end{proof}

\begin{example}[Two transfers: quantum turnover, persistent album entropy]
\label{ex:twocells}
Take
\[
 \theta_1=\pi/4,\qquad \theta_2=\pi/2.
\]
Then \(q_0=1\), \(q_1=1/2\), and \(q_2=0\).
For a basis input, the coherent radiation entropies are
\[
 (0,1,0).
\]
The final coherent radiation is a superposition of emission in the
first cell and emission in the second cell.

If each cell is destructively read out when returned, the final
record has two equally likely histories:
\[
 (\text{occupied in cell 1},\text{vacant in cell 2}),
 \qquad
 (\text{vacant in cell 1},\text{occupied in cell 2}).
\]
Its cumulative record entropies are
\[
 (0,1,1).
\]
For an arbitrary code input, the final classical record additionally
reports the measured logical basis label. Its quantum recovery error
is \(\bD\). The coherent time superposition has not survived as a
classical album.
\end{example}

\subsection{Passive accumulation has monotone recovery}

\begin{proposition}[Passive-release monotonicity]
\label{prop:passive}
Suppose each later transfer acts only on the complete residual and
returns an additional quantum factor, leaving earlier accessible
factors untouched. Then
\[
 \erec(\Nchan_{n+1})\le\erec(\Nchan_n),
 \qquad
 \dleak(\Cchan_{n+1})\le\dleak(\Cchan_n).
\]
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
The earlier accessible channel is obtained from the later one by
tracing the newly returned factor. A later decoder may therefore
discard that factor and use an earlier decoder.

The later complete residual channel is a CPTP postprocessing
\(\Lambda_n\Cchan_n\). For every replacement comparison,
\[
 \ddiam(\Lambda_n\Cchan_n,\rep{\Lambda_n(\tau)})
 \le\ddiam(\Cchan_n,\rep{\tau}).
\]
Take the infimum.
\end{proof}

If earlier accessible quantum factors are destructively measured,
edited, or lost, the required marginal relation can fail.
The proposition does not silently preserve factors that the program
has consumed.

%=====================================================================
\section{Entropy and thermal observations do not certify recovery}
\label{sec:separation}
%=====================================================================

\begin{theorem}[Selected spectral and thermal separation]
\label{thm:spectra}
Fix a state \(\sigma_K\), a purification \(\ket\chi_{KP}\), and
\(L\simeq C\). Use the same output spaces
\[
 A=C_A\otimes K,\qquad E=P\otimes L.
\]
The isometries
\begin{align}
 V_{\mathrm{return}}\ket\psi
 &=
 \ket\psi_{C_A}\ket\chi_{KP}\ket0_L,\\
 V_{\mathrm{retain}}\ket\psi
 &=
 \ket0_{C_A}\ket\chi_{KP}\ket\psi_L
\end{align}
have, for every pure logical input, identical accessible spectra and
entropy \(S(\sigma_K)\), but
\[
 \erec(\Nchan_{\mathrm{return}})=0,\qquad
 \erec(\Nchan_{\mathrm{retain}})=\aD.
\]
For \(H_A=I_{C_A}\otimes H_K\), their energy-measurement laws also
agree for every logical input. One may choose \(\sigma_K\) Gibbs.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Their accessible channels are
\[
 X\longmapsto X\otimes\sigma_K,
 \qquad
 X\longmapsto\Tr(X)\kb0 0\otimes\sigma_K.
\]
For pure \(X\), both outputs have the nonzero spectrum of
\(\sigma_K\). Tracing \(K\) decodes the first channel.
The second is replacement, so Lemma~\ref{lem:replacement} applies.
Every spectral effect of \(H_A\) acts trivially on \(C_A\), proving
equality of the selected energy laws.
\end{proof}

This construction is the finite separation recorded in Cheung's
En07-C and related comparisons
\cite{CheungEn07C,CheungOai265A}. It does not claim equality of the
channels on all inputs.

\begin{theorem}[Matched complete entropy histories, different recovery]
\label{thm:histories}
There are two energy-conserving sequential complete isometries with
the same accessible spaces and complete residual spaces such that:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
 \item every pure logical input has the same radiation entropy at
 every stage in both models;
 \item for one fixed logical input, their accessible density operators
 agree at every stage;
 \item at complete transfer, one model has recovery error zero and
 complete leakage zero, while the other has recovery error \(\aD\)
 and complete leakage \(\aD\).
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Use the schedule of Section~\ref{sec:schedule}, append a degenerate
register \(L\simeq C\), and keep \(L\) inaccessible.

In model \(G\), run the schedule on the variable input and leave
\(L\) fixed in \(\ket0\). In model \(L_{\mathrm{ret}}\), retain the
variable input in \(L\) and run the schedule on a dummy input fixed
in \(\ket0\). Both are isometries into the same output spaces.
The transfer unitaries conserve \eqref{eq:energy}; the additional
logical labels in \(L\) are degenerate and do not alter that ledger.

For pure inputs, the radiation entropy in \(G\) is \(\hb(q_n)\).
The dummy schedule has the same entropy. For input \(\ket0\), the
radiation states agree exactly at every stage.

At \(q_N=0\), model \(G\) returns \(J_N\ket\psi\) and has fixed
complete residual. Model \(L_{\mathrm{ret}}\) returns the fixed state
\(J_N\ket0\), while its complete residual retains \(\ket\psi_L\).
Replacement recovery has error \(\aD\).
The residual channel is an isometric copy of the code with fixed
spectators, whose distance to replacement is \(\aD\) by
Lemma~\ref{lem:replacement} and reversible compression.
\end{proof}

Cheung's Hawk01-B gives a sequential entropy-history separation of
this kind \cite{CheungHawk01B}. The proof above displays the hidden
memory explicitly. It does not compare two models under identical
assumptions of complete access and a unique empty endpoint.

\begin{remark}[Independent-factor entropy statements]
An entropy bound in a separately specified independent-factor model
does not estimate the diamond distance of an unspecified complete
complement. The independent-factor hypotheses in the supplied
Hawk03-A comparison must remain visible
\cite{CheungHawk03A}. We use no such bound to identify a time of maximal
leakage or to discharge a recovery certificate.
\end{remark}

%=====================================================================
\section{Approximate and same-model endpoint certificates}
\label{sec:endpoint}
%=====================================================================

\subsection{The approximation theorem used}

The only dimension-independent approximation theorem imported below
is the continuity of Stinespring dilations and its
information--disturbance consequence
\cite{KSW}. Its finite-dimensional form implies
\[
 \frac14\inf_{\Dchan}
 \norm{\Dchan\Nchan-\id_C}_{\diamond}^2
 \le
 \inf_\tau\norm{\Cchan-\rep{\tau}}_{\diamond}
 \le
 2\left(
 \inf_{\Dchan}\norm{\Dchan\Nchan-\id_C}_{\diamond}
 \right)^{1/2}.
\]
The norm convention is important.

\begin{proposition}[Half-diamond conversion]
\label{prop:approx}
For a complete interface,
\begin{equation}
 \erec(\Nchan)\le
 \min\{\aD,\sqrt{2\dleak(\Cchan)}\},
 \qquad
 \dleak(\Cchan)\le
 \min\{1,\sqrt{2\erec(\Nchan)}\}.
 \label{eq:approx}
\end{equation}
In particular, a purely classical accessible channel satisfies
\[
 \dleak(\Cchan)\ge\frac{\bD^2}{2}>0.
\]
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Substitute
\(\inf_{\Dchan}\norm{\Dchan\Nchan-\id}_{\diamond}=2\erec\)
and
\(\inf_\tau\norm{\Cchan-\rep{\tau}}_{\diamond}=2\dleak\)
into the displayed information--disturbance inequalities.
The universal cap \(\aD\) is Lemma~\ref{lem:replacement}.
The classical lower bound follows from
\(\erec^2\le2\dleak\) and
Theorem~\ref{thm:classical}.
\end{proof}

Thus a nearly constant \emph{complete complement} supplies a recovery
upper bound, while a nearly constant \emph{accessible channel}
supplies the lower bound in Proposition~\ref{prop:featureless}.
The directions cannot be exchanged.

\subsection{A finite Choi certificate}

Define the normalized Choi operator of a channel with code input by
\[
 \Jnorm(\Fchan)=(\id_Q\otimes\Fchan)(\Phi_d).
\]

\begin{lemma}[Normalized Choi comparison]
\label{lem:choi}
For channels \(\Fchan,\Qchan\) with input dimension \(d\),
\[
 \frac12\norm{\Jnorm(\Fchan)-\Jnorm(\Qchan)}_1
 \le\ddiam(\Fchan,\Qchan)
 \le
 \frac d2\norm{\Jnorm(\Fchan)-\Jnorm(\Qchan)}_1.
\]
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The first inequality uses the Bell input.
For a pure referenced input, write
\[
 \ket\psi=(T\otimes I_C)\ket{\Phi_d},
 \qquad
 \Tr(T^\dagger T)=d,
\]
allowing \(T\) to be rectangular for a larger reference.
Then \(\norm T_\infty^2\le d\), and its output difference is
\[
 (T\otimes I)
 [\Jnorm(\Fchan)-\Jnorm(\Qchan)]
 (T^\dagger\otimes I).
\]
Its trace norm is at most \(d\) times the Choi trace norm.
Convexity handles mixed referenced states. The state
characterization of channel diamond distance gives the result
\cite[Chapter 3]{Watrous}.
\end{proof}

\begin{definition}[Four same-model endpoint obligations]
\label{def:four}
An endpoint certificate supplies:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(E\arabic*)}]
 \item \textbf{Code and complete preparation.}
 A justified finite code, a specified preparation map, all ancillary
 purifications, and the external-reference task.
 \item \textbf{Complete evolution.}
 A complete unitary or isometric description including every lost
 output and measurement environment.
 \item \textbf{Access-preserving output identification.}
 A declared accessible output, its complete complement, and any proxy
 identifications. These identifications preserve the two sides
 separately; they do not mix accessible and inaccessible outputs.
 \item \textbf{Complete-complement certificate.}
 Exact replacement of the complete complement, or an explicit
 norm/Choi comparison proving approximate replacement on the whole
 code.
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}

These obligations express the same-model discipline in
\cite{CheungEn07B,CheungHawk04D}. They are not supplied merely by
termination, a selected spectrum, or a mass-loss estimate.

\begin{theorem}[Conditional endpoint certificate]
\label{thm:endpoint}
Suppose Definition~\ref{def:four} is satisfied.
After the specified access-preserving identifications, let
\(\mathcal V\) and \(\widehat{\mathcal V}\) be actual and proxy
complete channels with
\[
 \ddiam(\mathcal V,\widehat{\mathcal V})\le b.
\]
Let \(\widehat{\Cchan}\) be the proxy complete complement, and suppose
a feasible state \(\tau_E\) satisfies
\[
 e=
 \frac12\norm{
 \Jnorm(\widehat{\Cchan})-
 \frac{I_Q}{d}\otimes\tau_E}_1.
\]
Then
\begin{align}
 \dleak(\Cchan)
 &\le\min\{1,de+b\},
 \label{eq:endleak}\\
 \erec(\Nchan)
 &\le\min\{\aD,\sqrt{2de}+b\}.
 \label{eq:endrec}
\end{align}
The recovery bound is realized by a fixed proxy decoder, unless the
constant-decoder cap is smaller.

If a separately supplied proxy decoder has normalized decoded Choi
discrepancy
\[
 r=\frac12\norm{
 \Jnorm(\widehat{\Dchan}\widehat{\Nchan})-\Phi_d}_1,
\]
the same decoder on the actual accessible output has error at most
\[
 \min\{1,dr+b\}.
\]
Terminal residual Enter followed by drop changes none of these
pre-existing accessible channels.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Partial traces contract the complete-channel comparison, giving
accessible and complementary distances at most \(b\).
Lemma~\ref{lem:choi} gives
\[
 \ddiam(\widehat{\Cchan},\rep{\tau_E})\le de.
\]
The triangle inequality proves \eqref{eq:endleak}.
Proposition~\ref{prop:approx} supplies a proxy decoder with error
at most \(\sqrt{2de}\). Applying that fixed decoder to the actual
accessible channel adds at most \(b\).
The constant decoder gives the alternative cap \(\aD\).
The same Choi comparison and contraction prove the specified-decoder
bound. The final assertion is Theorem~\ref{thm:drop}.
\end{proof}

\begin{corollary}[What an endpoint can and cannot certify]
\label{cor:endpoint}
A certified constant complete complement proves quantum recovery,
not purity of an arbitrary raw record.
A purely classical endpoint with \(d\ge2\) cannot satisfy exact
obligation \textup{(E4)}.

An information-free residual may still have positive dimension and
positive energy. For example,
\[
 V\ket\psi=\ket\psi_A\ket1_E,
 \qquad
 H_E=\epsilon\kb1 1,\quad \epsilon>0,
\]
has zero leakage and residual energy \(\epsilon\).
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
Use Remark~\ref{rem:purity} and
Corollary~\ref{cor:classicalendpoint}.
The displayed residual channel is replacement by \(\kb1 1\),
so Theorem~\ref{thm:exact} applies directly.
\end{proof}

No gravitational instance of Definition~\ref{def:four} has been
constructed in this paper.

%=====================================================================
\section{Finite recurrence and the three ledgers}
\label{sec:ledgers}
%=====================================================================

\subsection{A fixed finite autonomous proxy is recurrent}

\begin{proposition}[Finite autonomous recurrence]
\label{prop:recurrence}
Let \(H\) be a fixed finite-dimensional Hamiltonian and let
\(V_t=e^{-itH}V_0\) describe a fixed prepared interface.
There are arbitrarily late times with complete-channel distance
arbitrarily close to that at \(t=0\).
If the initial accessible channel is replacement, then
\[
 \limsup_{t\to\infty}\erec(\Nchan_t)=\aD.
\]
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
There are finitely many eigenvalues. Simultaneous recurrence of their
phases gives arbitrarily late times for which
\(e^{-itH}\) is arbitrarily close to the identity in operator norm.
For isometries,
\[
 \ddiam(\Ad_V,\Ad_W)\le\norm{V-W}_\infty.
\]
Indeed, apply the pure-state trace-distance bound to every referenced
input and then use convexity.
Partial trace gives accessible-channel recurrence.
Lemma~\ref{lem:stability} gives recovery-error recurrence.
The initial error and the universal upper bound are both \(\aD\).
\end{proof}

The proposition concerns a fixed finite autonomous closed proxy, not
the externally controlled terminal schedule in
Section~\ref{sec:schedule}. An outgoing limit or a changing access
model needs its own justification
\cite{CheungHawk04A,CheungHawk04D}.

\subsection{Three different kinds of data}

The ledgers are:
\[
 \boxed{
 \begin{array}{c}
 \text{complete Hamiltonian energy and its transfers}\\
 \text{implementation heat, work, and cyclic reset resources}\\
 \text{information-theoretic complete residual leakage}
 \end{array}}
\]
These are distinct mathematical objects. Their numerical values are
not being compared by a universal inequality.

\begin{proposition}[A reduced channel does not determine a thermal cost]
\label{prop:cost}
Equality of reduced channels, including a reset channel or partial
trace, does not determine heat, work, or cyclic reusable-memory reset
cost.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Let \(M\) be a qubit and \(L\) an independent blank qubit.
For every referenced input,
\[
 \operatorname{SWAP}_{ML}
 (\rho_{QM}\otimes\kb0 0_L)
 \operatorname{SWAP}_{ML}^\dagger
 =
 \kb0 0_M\otimes\rho_{QL}.
\]
The reduced channel on \(M\) is always reset.
Choose
\[
 H_M=H_L=\epsilon\kb1 1,\qquad\epsilon>0.
\]
The swap conserves their sum. If the initial excitation probability
is \(p\), the energy changes are
\[
 \Delta E_M=-\epsilon p,\qquad
 \Delta E_L=\epsilon p.
\]
The same reset channel therefore accompanies different energy
transfers as \(\epsilon\) varies.

Even with these Hamiltonians fixed, append an independent fuel qubit
initially excited and a Gibbs reservoir qubit with the same gap.
Swapping them changes reservoir energy by
\(\epsilon(1-r)\), where
\(r=(1+e^{\beta\epsilon})^{-1}\), without changing the observed
memory channel. Such spectator processes alter an implementation
ledger while leaving its reduced channel unchanged.

These examples consume resources. They are not cyclic erasure
protocols until blanks, fuel, and controls are restored.
\end{proof}

This underdetermination is explicitly separated from thermal erasure
in Cheung's En07-A/B/C
\cite{CheungEn07A,CheungEn07B,CheungEn07C}.

\begin{proposition}[Thermal erasure requires additional assumptions]
\label{prop:landauer}
Let \(M\) initially be uncorrelated with a reservoir \(L\) in
\[
 \gamma_L=e^{-\beta H_L}/Z,
 \qquad \beta=(k_{\mathrm B}T)^{-1}.
\]
Suppose the complete \(M L\) process is unitary, and define reservoir
heat \(Q_L=\Tr H_L(\rho_L'-\gamma_L)\).
Then, with entropies and relative entropy \(D_2\) in bits,
\[
 \beta Q_L
 =
 \ln2\left[
 S(\rho_M)-S(\rho_M')
 +I(M:L)_{\rho'}
 +D_2(\rho_L'\Vert\gamma_L)
 \right].
\]
In particular,
\[
 Q_L\ge k_{\mathrm B}T\ln2\,
 [S(\rho_M)-S(\rho_M')].
\]
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Unitary preservation of the initial product entropy gives
\[
 S(\rho_L')-S(\gamma_L)
 =
 S(\rho_M)-S(\rho_M')+I(M:L)_{\rho'}.
\]
The Gibbs expression gives
\[
 \ln2\,D_2(\rho_L'\Vert\gamma_L)
 =
 \beta Q_L-\ln2[S(\rho_L')-S(\gamma_L)].
\]
Combine the equations. Mutual information and relative entropy are
nonnegative.
\end{proof}

This is the equality form of the thermal ledger emphasized by
Reeb and Wolf \cite{ReebWolf}, in the tradition of Landauer
\cite{Landauer}. It is not a consequence of
\(\Drop\circ\Enter=\Tr\) alone.

%=====================================================================
\section{The corrected four-stage narrative and analogies}
\label{sec:narrative}
%=====================================================================

\subsection{Four stages, with the output type fixed}

\paragraph{Early stage.}
A complete isometry prepares an accessible factor and complete
residual. If a separately proved comparison makes the accessible
channel nearly replacement, recovery has the lower bound in
Proposition~\ref{prop:featureless}. In the conserving schedule,
\(q\) is initially near one, so quantum recovery error and complete
leakage are both near \(\aD\). Destructive Enter replaces a
returned quantum carrier by a classical outcome and enlarges the
complete complement by its measurement environment.

\paragraph{Entropy peak.}
In the pure-input flagged schedule, the quantum radiation entropy
peaks at \(q=1/2\). This is a schedule-dependent turnover, not a
universal Page time. Recovery error and leakage are not maximal at
that cut. More generally, an entropy peak does not establish that
recovery is about to begin, by Theorem~\ref{thm:histories}.

\paragraph{Late stage.}
Further coherent transfer can reduce complete leakage and enable
recovery. This is certified by the channel, not by the entropy slope.
For a pure unreferenced input in the flagged schedule,
\(S(R)\) decreases as \(q\) approaches zero. For a referenced input,
the radiation marginal need not become pure. If the returned output
is instead only an append-only classical record, its Shannon entropy
does not decrease and its whole-code recovery obstruction remains.

\paragraph{Final stage.}
A certified quantum endpoint with constant complete complement
admits a deterministic reference-preserving decoder. A mixed
input-independent syndrome may remain. Terminal Enter plus drop
consumes the named residual interface without changing the earlier
accessible channel. It does not turn classical records into quantum
radiation or prove an energetic explosion. If all returned carriers
are classical, exact whole-code recovery is impossible for \(d\ge2\).

\subsection{Quantum-processor analogy}

Load an unknown code into the occupied memory sector of
Section~\ref{sec:schedule}. Apply declared transfer unitaries and retain
the emitted quantum cells coherently. Early radiation is nearly
vacant, and recovery is poor. As the survival probability \(q_n\)
decreases, the radiation supports better recovery. At complete
transfer its quantum state carries the code, including any
reference correlations.

Now replace coherent storage by destructive Enter on every emitted
cell. The processor returns emission-time and basis-label records.
Those records can accurately answer classical questions, but they
do not return the unknown quantum code. Example~\ref{ex:twocells}
shows explicitly why the classical bit stream does not inherit the
quantum entropy fall.

The processor runs no gravitational Hamiltonian. Its access split is
an operational declaration, not a metric-defined horizon.

\subsection{Torn-strip analogy, corrected}

For an ordinary \emph{classical} message strip, photographs can
successively reduce uncertainty about the message:
\(H(L\mid Y_{\le n})\) can fall. The full photograph album's entropy
need not fall.

For an unknown \emph{quantum} strip, photographing each fragment
means choosing a destructive instrument. The album retains outcomes,
not the discarded quantum coherence. The universal record-only
recovery error is at least \(\bD\), even after the last photograph.
A quantum version of the successful transfer picture must retain
coherent fragments or another explicitly declared quantum carrier.
It cannot use photographs as if they were quantum paper.

The friend may retain fixed degrees of freedom or energy after losing
all logical dependence. ``Information-free'' is not ``nonexistent''.

\subsection{Library-card analogy, corrected}

If books contain classical text from a known alphabet, enough
photocopies may identify that text. This is a classical reconstruction
task.

If ``book'' denotes an arbitrary unknown quantum state, photocopying
means measurement. A purely classical collection cannot reconstruct
all amplitudes from one copy or preserve its reference entanglement.
The library must return a quantum carrier for that task. Classical
index cards may select a branch decoder only under the hybrid
conditions of Theorem~\ref{thm:hybrid}.

Emptying the named locked stack is interface termination. It does
not prove that every physical implementation factor has disappeared,
or that earlier photocopies have become pure.

%=====================================================================
\section{Hawk05-A release theorem}
\label{sec:release}
%=====================================================================

\begin{theorem}[Corrected Enter/Page operational certificate]
\label{thm:main}
Under the complete finite interface and specified destructive
readout semantics:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
 \item Complete isometric evolution preserves the quantum code,
 including all external references.
 \item Exact recovery from the declared accessible output is
 equivalent to replacement of its complete complement.
 \item Every purely classical returned record has whole-code
 recovery error at least \(1-1/d\), permanently.
 \item The entropy of an unedited cumulative classical record is
 nondecreasing; a retained random record prevents purity of the raw
 hybrid output.
 \item The conserving schedule of Section~\ref{sec:schedule} has
 \[
  \erec(\Nchan_q)=q(1-d^{-2}),
  \qquad
  \dleak(\Cchan_q)=q(1-d^{-2}),
 \]
 while its pure-input quantum radiation entropy is \(\hb(q)\).
 Its residual recovery error is instead
 \((1-q)(1-d^{-2})\).
 \item Destructive readout of its flagged quantum output has exact
 recovery error
 \[
  q(1-d^{-2})+(1-q)(1-d^{-1}).
 \]
 \item Matched pure-input entropy histories and matched selected
 thermal observations can have opposite endpoint recoverability.
 \item Residual readout followed by classical discard is partial
 trace and leaves the already-returned accessible channel unchanged.
 \item Approximate endpoint recovery follows from the four
 same-model obligations and the norm bounds of
 Theorem~\ref{thm:endpoint}, not from entropy, termination, or a
 channel-only thermal interpretation.
\end{enumerate}
These statements establish a finite operational analogy. They do not
construct a gravitational Page curve, a microscopic evaporation
channel, or the inherited characteristic quantum coefficient.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Items (i)--(ii) are Theorems~\ref{thm:global} and \ref{thm:exact}.
Item (iii) is Theorem~\ref{thm:classical}.
Item (iv) is Theorem~\ref{thm:recordentropy}.
Item (v) is the corrected calibration
\eqref{eq:correctflagleak}, together with
\eqref{eq:flagrec} and \eqref{eq:flagentropy}.
Item (vi) is Proposition~\ref{prop:measuredflag}.
Item (vii) is Theorems~\ref{thm:spectra} and \ref{thm:histories}.
Item (viii) is Theorem~\ref{thm:drop}.
Item (ix) is Theorem~\ref{thm:endpoint} and
Proposition~\ref{prop:cost}.
No gravitational identification or characteristic composition is an
object constructed in these proofs.
\end{proof}

\paragraph{Final correction to the proposed conclusion.}
A rise-and-fall shape is not an automatic consequence of complete
unitarity, Enter, or complement constancy. It occurs for particular
quantum states and schedules. Complement constancy characterizes
whole-code recoverability; it does not force a prescribed entropy
path. The classical album version is excluded by the proved
record-only and entropy obstructions.

%=====================================================================
\appendix
\section{The separate characteristic-map programme remains open}
\label{app:analytic}
%=====================================================================

The supplied material also describes a distinct analytic programme
for a retained six-branch response. That programme is not solved by a
finite channel analogy. We record its boundary without converting an
unconstructed map into a nonexistence theorem.

Cheung's XIV-I supplies an internal amplitude construction at I2,
while its joint characteristic map remains unresolved at I3.
XIV-J supplies reconstruction constraints and a supported-sector
reference, while the full map remains unresolved at J2
\cite{CheungXIVI,CheungXIVJ}.

\subsection{A self-contained reconstruction constraint}

\begin{proposition}[Descent through reconstruction]
\label{prop:descent}
Let
\[
 \Rec:\mathscr P\to\mathscr K
\]
be a surjective linear reconstruction map, and let
\(\widetilde M:\mathscr P\to\mathscr Y\) be linear.
There is a unique map \(M:\mathscr K\to\mathscr Y\) with
\(\widetilde M=M\Rec\) if and only if
\[
 \ker\Rec\subseteq\ker\widetilde M.
\]
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Factorization annihilates every reconstruction-null presentation.
Conversely, define \(M(\Rec A)=\widetilde M(A)\).
Two presentations of the same reconstruction differ by an element
of \(\ker\Rec\), so the definition is independent of the presentation.
Surjectivity proves uniqueness.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}[Presentation degree is not an intrinsic symbol]
\label{lem:analyticnull}
Suppose an adapted convention gives
\[
 \Rec(M_{\mathrm R})=\delta(q)\otimes R,
 \qquad
 \Rec(i\theta M_{\mathrm R})=\delta'(q)\otimes R,
\]
and reconstructs multiplication by \(q\) as the same physical
coordinate multiplication. Then
\[
 \Rec((q\,i\theta+1)M_{\mathrm R})=0.
\]
For \(R\ne0\), its two summands reconstruct to nonzero opposite
distributions.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
For a test function \(\varphi\),
\[
 \langle q\delta',\varphi\rangle
 =
 -\left.\frac{d}{dq}(q\varphi(q))\right|_{q=0}
 =
 -\varphi(0).
\]
Hence \(q\delta'=-\delta\). Tensor with \(R\).
\end{proof}

These are the descent and null-presentation distinctions in the
supplied XIV-J and XV-B records
\cite{CheungXIVJ,CheungXVB}. The lemma does not invalidate estimates
on a named internal amplitude module. It prevents a
representative-dependent highest term from being promoted to an
intrinsic joint symbol without a descent theorem.

\subsection{No transfer across the missing gates}

The retained target includes
\[
 K_{\mathrm{ret}}=K_{47}+K_5+K_6+K_8+K_9,
 \qquad K_{47}=K_4+K_7,
\]
with both \(K_5\) placements and both response legs.
A reference for the supported sector
\(K_6+K_8+K_9\) away from its characteristic locus does not
construct the complete contraction across that locus.

The remaining requested analytic chain is:
\begin{enumerate}
 \item the full joint characteristic map;
 \item a joint section and complete controlled remainder;
 \item uniform transverse estimates;
 \item compatibility with the permitted contacts and singular
 spectators;
 \item the complete output wavefront theorem;
 \item normalized admission of the quantum coefficient in the
 declared output space.
\end{enumerate}
The supplied excerpts do not discharge that chain.
The proofs of this paper concern different finite objects and do
not discharge it either. Descent is necessary but not quantum
admission; a supported-sector extension alone would not finish the
full target.

\paragraph{Version-sensitive reading.}
The supplied XV-B version 2 proves general relative-lifting and
extension interfaces but explicitly leaves the inherited
graph-specific map unresolved. Its existence as a technical
manuscript must not be confused with passage through the earlier
downstream admission exit. We make no claim that those general
interfaces complete the frozen graph.

\paragraph{Standing boundaries preserved.}
No quantum coefficient of the inherited characteristic graph is
admitted here. The downstream quantum-admission exit is not opened.
The supplied statuses \(O.1=\texttt{NOT\_CLOSED}\) and the undischarged
XVI-N obligation are unchanged. OpenAI catalogue families and
Oai265-A's documentary comparisons are not theorem premises of
Hawk05-A. No fixed finite-band regulator is transferred to an
unconstructed gravitational collapse channel.

%=====================================================================
\section*{Declarations}
\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Declarations}
%=====================================================================

\paragraph{Originality and attribution.}
The exact correction criterion, Stinespring continuity,
entanglement-breaking structure, and thermal equality have established
sources identified in the bibliography. Cheung's manuscripts are
cited by identifier and version where appropriate.
The present contribution is a standalone finite proof package and
an explicit correction of the proposed classical-record narrative.
No claim is made that the standard channel results are new.

\paragraph{Source provenance.}
Internal manuscript comparisons use the supplied excerpts and the
Enter Calculus Companion records. Full independent verification of
the entire registered corpus is not asserted.
The journal record for Cheung's Enter article is distinguished from
the undated internal manuscripts; its publication metadata are not
transferred to them.

\paragraph{Physical scope.}
No gravitational Hamiltonian, backreaction law, microscopic
evaporation endpoint, island, quantum extremal surface, or
gravity-generated-entanglement test is constructed.
The conserving register Hamiltonian \(H_0\) is not a gravitational
mass law. Information-free residuals are not identified with
physically nonexistent remnants.

\paragraph{Verification and build.}
This file contains its own bibliography and requires no external
figures or generated data. It is written for \texttt{pdflatex}.
No successful compiler execution, proof-assistant verification,
independent symbolic execution, laboratory calibration, referee
approval, or journal acceptance of Hawk05-A is asserted.

%=====================================================================
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{References}
%=====================================================================

\bibitem{EnterPhilosophy}
Enter Calculus Companion,
\emph{The Philosophy of Enter}.
Documentary exposition and source distinctions.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/enter}.
Accessed 15 October 2026.

\bibitem{CheungEnter}
N.~Cheung,
``The Enter Calculus: A Linear Quantum Lambda Calculus with an
Operational Characterization of Measurement.''
\emph{Frontiers in Physics}, volume 14 (2026).
Publisher record lists acceptance on 28 September 2026.
The final formatted article was not independently inspected here.
DOI: \url{https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2026.1954943}.

\bibitem{CheungI}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Manuscript I}, version 2.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Supplied finite Born-characterization and destructive-readout record,
including \texttt{thm:main}.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/I}.
No publication date is inferred.

\bibitem{CheungHawk04A}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Hawk04-A: Unitary Information Preservation and Radiation
Recovery: A Complete-Complement Formulation of the Black-Hole
Information Problem}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/Hawk04-A}.

\bibitem{CheungHawk04B}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Hawk04-B: Black-Hole Information as an Access Problem:
Enter, Quantum Recovery, and Complete Residuals}, version 2.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Relevant supplied labels:
\texttt{thm:exact}, \texttt{thm:classical}, \texttt{thm:drop}.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/Hawk04-B}.

\bibitem{CheungHawk04C}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Hawk04-C: Finite Enter Analogues of the Hawking Narrative:
Access, Complete Complements, and Destructive Readout}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Relevant supplied label: \texttt{thm:main}.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/Hawk04-C}.

\bibitem{CheungHawk04D}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Hawk04-D: From Finite Enter Interfaces to Conditional
Evaporation Certificates: Controlled Limits, Mass Laws, and
Quantum Recovery}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Relevant supplied labels:
\texttt{thm:flagged}, \texttt{thm:endpoint}, \texttt{thm:main}.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/Hawk04-D}.

\bibitem{CheungHawk02B}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Hawk02-B: Hamiltonian-Derived Emission and Quantitative
Recovery in a Finite Evaporation Model}, version 2.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Relevant supplied labels: \texttt{thm:B3}, \texttt{thm:B7}.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/Hawk02-B}.

\bibitem{CheungHawk01B}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Hawk01-B}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Supplied entropy-history separation,
\texttt{thm:entropyseparation}.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/Hawk01-B}.

\bibitem{CheungHawk03A}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Hawk03-A}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Supplied exact complete-complement criterion and separately
hypothesized independent-factor entropy comparisons.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/Hawk03-A}.

\bibitem{CheungEn07A}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{En07-A: Enter, Reversible Recycling, and Thermodynamic Access:
Complete Residuals Without Holographic Identification}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/En07-A}.

\bibitem{CheungEn07B}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{En07-B: Access-Preserving Endpoint Certificates under
Destructive Enter}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Supplied four-obligation endpoint and thermodynamic-underdetermination
records.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/En07-B}.

\bibitem{CheungEn07C}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{En07-C: Hawking Radiation under Destructive Enter}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Relevant supplied labels:
\texttt{prop:entropy}, \texttt{lem:erasure-interface}.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/En07-C}.

\bibitem{CheungEn02C}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{En02-C}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Supplied reference-preserving sequential soundness,
\texttt{thm:C1}.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/En02-C}.

\bibitem{CheungVIIG}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{VII-G}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Supplied finite hybrid instrument structure,
\texttt{thm:structure}.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/VII-G}.

\bibitem{CheungEm05B}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Em05-B}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Supplied exact complementary-channel criterion,
\texttt{thm:constantComplement}.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/Em05-B}.

\bibitem{CheungOai265A}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Oai265-A}, version 2.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Supplied record/spectrum/recovery separation,
\texttt{thm:separation}.
A documentary comparison, not verification or adoption of an
OpenAI catalogue family.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/Oai265-A}.

\bibitem{CheungXIVI}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{XIV-I}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Supplied internal amplitude construction at I2 and unresolved
joint-map boundary at I3.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/XIV-I}.

\bibitem{CheungXIVJ}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{XIV-J}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Supplied reconstruction descent, supported-sector reference, and
unresolved full-map boundary at J2.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/XIV-J}.

\bibitem{CheungXVB}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{XV-B}, version 2.
Enter Calculus Companion.
Supplied relative-lifting and extension interfaces; the inherited
graph-specific characteristic map remains unresolved.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/XV-B}.

\bibitem{Watrous}
J.~Watrous,
\emph{The Theory of Quantum Information}.
Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Author's manuscript and errata:
\url{https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~watrous/TQI/}.

\bibitem{KnillLaflamme}
E.~Knill and R.~Laflamme,
``Theory of quantum error-correcting codes.''
\emph{Physical Review A} \textbf{55} (1997), 900--911.
DOI: \url{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.55.900}.

\bibitem{KSW}
D.~Kretschmann, D.~Schlingemann, and R.~F.~Werner,
``The information-disturbance tradeoff and the continuity of
Stinespring's representation.''
\emph{IEEE Transactions on Information Theory}
\textbf{54} (2008), 1708--1717.
DOI: \url{https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2008.917696}.
Preprint: \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0605009}.

\bibitem{HorodeckiShorRuskai}
M.~Horodecki, P.~W.~Shor, and M.~B.~Ruskai,
``Entanglement breaking channels.''
\emph{Reviews in Mathematical Physics}
\textbf{15} (2003), 629--641.
DOI: \url{https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X03001709}.
Preprint: \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0302031}.

\bibitem{BraunsteinPati}
S.~L.~Braunstein and A.~K.~Pati,
``Quantum information cannot be completely hidden in correlations:
Implications for the black-hole information paradox.''
\emph{Physical Review Letters} \textbf{98} (2007), 080502.
DOI: \url{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.080502}.

\bibitem{PageAverage}
D.~N.~Page,
``Average entropy of a subsystem.''
\emph{Physical Review Letters} \textbf{71} (1993), 1291--1294.
DOI: \url{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1291}.
Preprint: \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9305007}.

\bibitem{Sen}
S.~Sen,
``Average entropy of a subsystem.''
\emph{Physical Review Letters} \textbf{77} (1996), 1--3.
DOI: \url{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1}.
Preprint: \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9601132}.

\bibitem{PageRadiation}
D.~N.~Page,
``Information in black hole radiation.''
\emph{Physical Review Letters} \textbf{71} (1993), 3743--3746.
DOI: \url{https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3743}.
Preprint: \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9306083}.

\bibitem{HaydenPreskill}
P.~Hayden and J.~Preskill,
``Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems.''
\emph{Journal of High Energy Physics} \textbf{2007}(09), 120.
DOI: \url{https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/120}.
Preprint: \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.4025}.

\bibitem{Hawking}
S.~W.~Hawking,
``Particle creation by black holes.''
\emph{Communications in Mathematical Physics}
\textbf{43} (1975), 199--220.
DOI: \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345020}.

\bibitem{Landauer}
R.~Landauer,
``Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process.''
\emph{IBM Journal of Research and Development}
\textbf{5} (1961), 183--191.
DOI: \url{https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.53.0183}.

\bibitem{ReebWolf}
D.~Reeb and M.~M.~Wolf,
``An improved Landauer principle with finite-size corrections.''
\emph{New Journal of Physics} \textbf{16} (2014), 103011.
DOI: \url{https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/103011}.
Preprint: \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.4352}.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}