\documentclass[11pt]{article}

\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage[a4paper,margin=2.5cm]{geometry}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm,mathtools}
\usepackage{booktabs,array,longtable}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage{microtype}
\usepackage[
  hidelinks,
  pdftitle={I-B-G: Intrinsic and holonomy-twisted Green operators on a prescribed conical spacetime},
  pdfauthor={}
]{hyperref}

\newcommand{\RR}{\mathbb R}
\newcommand{\ZZ}{\mathbb Z}
\newcommand{\NN}{\mathbb N}
\newcommand{\CC}{\mathbb C}
\newcommand{\dd}{\mathrm d}
\newcommand{\ii}{\mathrm i}
\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}
\newcommand{\WW}{\mathcal W}
\newcommand{\HH}{\mathcal H}
\newcommand{\Dinf}{\mathcal H^\infty}
\newcommand{\Dtc}{\mathscr D_{\mathrm{tc}}}
\newcommand{\Espace}{\mathscr E}
\newcommand{\SourceLabel}[1]{\nolinkurl{#1}}
\newcommand{\NOTCLOSED}{\texttt{NOT\_CLOSED}}
\newcommand{\bsr}{\texttt{bulk\_\allowbreak symmetry\_\allowbreak restored}}
\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\lvert #1\rangle}
\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\langle #1\rvert}
\newcommand{\proj}[1]{\ket{#1}\bra{#1}}
\newcommand{\pair}[2]{\left\langle #1,#2\right\rangle}
\newcommand{\norm}[1]{\left\lVert #1\right\rVert}

\DeclareMathOperator{\supp}{supp}
\DeclareMathOperator{\dom}{dom}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Tr}{Tr}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Rot}{Rot}
\DeclareMathOperator{\arccosh}{arccosh}
\DeclareMathOperator{\spec}{spec}

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{>{\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}

\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}

\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\newtheorem{assumption}[theorem]{Assumption}

\theoremstyle{remark}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}

\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\setlist{itemsep=3pt,topsep=5pt}
\setlength{\LTpre}{8pt}
\setlength{\LTpost}{8pt}
\Urlmuskip=0mu plus 2mu
\emergencystretch=2em

\title{\textbf{I-B-G: Intrinsic and holonomy-twisted Green operators\\
on a prescribed conical spacetime}\\[5pt]
\large Self-adjoint extensions, diffraction, finite propagation,\\
and supported transfer from flat-completion laboratories}
\author{Ngo Cheung}
\date{October 2026}

\begin{document}
\maketitle

\begin{abstract}
The regular conical product prescribed in I-B is not globally
hyperbolic. Consequently, an intrinsic wave evolution requires an
additional choice at the missing apex. We construct retarded and
advanced inverses of the Klein--Gordon equation from a specified
semibounded self-adjoint spatial extension, including flat complex
line bundles with prescribed holonomy. We classify the
rotation-diagonal, spatial-product extensions considered here and
give their exact positivity criterion, distinguishing transverse
bound states from the continuous bands they generate after adding
the longitudinal direction.

For the Friedrichs extension we prove two-sided Green identities,
an exact sequence on the extension-dependent spectral smooth
domain, and finite propagation with respect to the intrinsic
spatial distance. We derive a Sommerfeld--Carslaw--Dowker
representation consisting of finitely many geometric terms and
an apex-diffracted term. The latter begins at the broken-path
length through the apex. Angular lift factors, local parallel
trivialisations, image boundaries, and the advanced sign are
specified explicitly.

A supported transfer theorem identifies the intrinsic scalar
operator with the flat-completion operator before the first
additional arrival. Its use in the Enter companion sheets also
requires their independent retained-shadow and laboratory-margin
hypotheses. A finite supplied-report catalogue is constructed
without interpreting finite numerical agreement as a
distributional identity or as acquisition of a continuum field.
The reported numerical discrepancies from the supplied draft are
retained separately as unverified numerical data. General
non-Friedrichs propagation, non-diagonal extension families,
spinor and gauge constraints, uniform flat limits, states, and
interacting products are not constructed.
\end{abstract}

\tableofcontents

%======================================================================
\section{Purpose, attribution, and logical scope}
\label{sec:introduction}
%======================================================================

The spacetime companions X-A-ST, X-B-ST, X-C-ST, X-D-ST,
V-B, IX-A-ST, IX-B-ST, IX-C-ST, and III-B use a supported
developing presentation of the prescribed I-B host
\cite{CheungIB,CheungXAST,CheungXBST,CheungXCST,CheungXDST,
CheungVB,CheungIXAST,CheungIXBST,CheungIXCST,CheungIIIB}.
Their global free scalar and Green operators belong to a
separately declared Minkowski completion. A developing chart
does not itself supply an intrinsic conical inverse.

This paper supplies such an inverse after an apex extension has
been specified. It does not change the hypotheses or conclusions
of those companions. The connection to their supported scalar
calculations is a separate theorem
(Theorem~\ref{thm:transfer} and Corollary~\ref{cor:expressions}),
not a reinterpretation of their original global analytical
domains.

The analytical ingredients are classical: self-adjoint spectral
theory; Bessel transforms; the Sommerfeld and Carslaw
construction; Dowker's cone and flux calculations; and the
geometric diffraction framework of Cheeger and Taylor
\cite{ReedSimonII,Watson,Sommerfeld1896,Carslaw1899,Carslaw1920,
Dowker1977,Dowker1987,CheegerTaylor1,CheegerTaylor2}.
Kay and Studer discuss the apex extension problem for cones and
idealised cosmic strings \cite{KayStuder}; the related radial
inverse-square operators are treated explicitly by
Derezi\'nski and Richard \cite{DerezinskiRichard}.
These references provide mathematical context, not a
derivation of the prescribed Enter geometry.

The Green-operator terminology is consistent with
B\"ar--Ginoux--Pf\"affle \cite{BGP}. Their globally hyperbolic
existence theorem is not invoked on the regular cone.
Here existence comes from a declared spatial extension, and
the exact sequence is proved on a declared spectral domain.

\paragraph{What ``open'' means here.}
An item marked \textbf{Open} is not resolved in this paper.
This is not a claim that the corresponding problem is
unknown in the literature. In particular, no assertion about
the absence of results in an entire manuscript corpus is
needed for any proof.

\paragraph{Non-identifications.}
The geometry, the apex condition, and any independent
Aharonov--Bohm phase are inputs. The construction gives no
Einstein dynamics, spacetime emergence, conical quantum state,
Hadamard covariance, time-ordered product, or interacting
algebra. The finite reporting interface introduced below does
not measure an unknown continuum field.

%======================================================================
\section{The prescribed host and its causal geometry}
\label{sec:host}
%======================================================================

\begin{assumption}[Prescribed I-B geometry]
\label{ass:host}
Fix
\[
 0<\mu<2\pi,\qquad
 \alpha=1-\frac{\mu}{2\pi}\in(0,1),\qquad
 c>0,\qquad m\geq0.
\]
The regular spatial cone and the regular spacetime are
\[
 C_\mu^\circ=(0,\infty)\times(\RR/2\pi\ZZ),\qquad
 h=\dd r^2+\alpha^2r^2\dd\varphi^2,
\]
\[
 N=C_\mu^\circ\times\RR_z,\qquad
 M=\RR_T\times N,\qquad
 g=-c^2\dd T^2+h+\dd z^2.
\]
The metric completion adds the apex worldsheet
\[
 \WW=\RR_T\times\{o\}\times\RR_z,
\]
but \(\WW\) is not part of \(M\).
The opening angle is \(2\pi\alpha=2\pi-\mu\).
These are the prescribed background data of I-B
\cite{CheungIB}.
\end{assumption}

Choose an origin \(T_\Sigma\) and put
\[
 t=c(T-T_\Sigma),\qquad
 q=h+\dd z^2,\qquad
 \dd V=\alpha r\,\dd r\,\dd\varphi\,\dd z.
\]
Thus
\[
 g=-\dd t^2+q,\qquad
 \dd\mathrm{vol}_g=\dd t\,\dd V.
\]
All propagation times and lengths below are measured in
these \(t\)-units. A time bound in the \(T\)-coordinate is
obtained by division by \(c\).

\subsection{Signature and operator ledger}

Let
\[
 \eta=\dd t^2-\dd X^2-\dd Y^2-\dd z^2
\]
on the analytical completion \(\widehat M=\RR^{1+3}\).
On a supported developing region the map
\[
 \mathrm{dev}(t,r,\varphi,z)
  =(t,r\cos(\alpha\varphi),r\sin(\alpha\varphi),z)
\]
satisfies
\begin{equation}
 \mathrm{dev}^*\eta=-g.
 \label{eq:signature}
\end{equation}
Equivalently, if \(j=\mathrm{dev}^{-1}\) is the chart
embedding from the developed laboratory to the host, then
\(j^*g=-\eta\). This is the signature ledger used in
X-A-ST and its successors
\cite[\SourceLabel{prop:signature-ledger},
\SourceLabel{ass:host}]{CheungXAST}
\cite[\SourceLabel{ass:host}]{CheungXBST,CheungXCST,CheungXDST}.

We use the scalar \emph{equation operator}
\begin{equation}
 P_m=-\Box_g+m^2
     =\partial_t^2-\Delta_q+m^2.
 \label{eq:P}
\end{equation}
On the completion it is \(\Box_\eta+m^2\).
If a companion uses the action Hessian \(-P_m\), its
inverse is \(-G_\pm\), not \(G_\pm\).
This distinction preserves the normalization of X-B-ST
and XI-B \cite{CheungXBST,CheungXIB}.

\begin{remark}[Deficit convention]
Throughout, \(\mu\) is the deficit, not the opening angle.
In particular, \(\alpha=\mu/(2\pi)\) would describe a
different parametrisation. The Bessel orders in this paper
are always \(|n+\beta|/\alpha\) with
\(\alpha=1-\mu/(2\pi)\).
\end{remark}

\subsection{Distance and the causal relation}

For \(x=(r,\varphi,z)\) and \(x'=(r',\varphi',z')\), let
\[
 \psi\in(-\pi\alpha,\pi\alpha]
\]
represent \(\alpha(\varphi-\varphi')\) modulo \(2\pi\alpha\),
and write \(\Delta z=z-z'\). Define
\begin{equation}
 R_0(x,x')^2
 =r^2+r'^2-2rr'\cos\psi+\Delta z^2.
 \label{eq:R0}
\end{equation}

\begin{proposition}[Intrinsic distance and causality]
\label{prop:distance}
The intrinsic distance of \(N\) is
\[
 d(x,x')=R_0(x,x').
\]
It is realised by a spatial geodesic lying entirely in \(N\).
Consequently,
\begin{equation}
 J_M^\pm(t',x')
 =\{(t,x):\ \pm(t-t')\geq d(x,x')\}.
 \label{eq:causal}
\end{equation}
For every compact \(K\subset M\), \(J_M^\pm(K)\) is closed
in \(M\).
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
First consider the completed two-dimensional cone.
It is a proper length space: bounded closed sets are
compact in polar coordinates, with all angular coordinates
identified at \(r=0\). A length-minimising curve therefore
exists, by the usual compactness argument for
equi-Lipschitz curves.

The developed straight segment with angular separation
\(\psi\) avoids the origin because
\(|\psi|\leq\pi\alpha<\pi\). It has length
\[
 \bigl(r^2+r'^2-2rr'\cos\psi\bigr)^{1/2}<r+r'.
\]
A minimiser cannot pass through the apex, since every such
curve has length at least \(r+r'\).
Away from the apex a minimiser develops to a straight
segment. Its continuous angular variation has absolute
value less than \(\pi\) and is congruent to \(\psi\)
modulo \(2\pi\alpha\). The smallest possible absolute
variation is \(|\psi|\). Since the chord length is
nondecreasing in the absolute angle on \([0,\pi]\), the
displayed segment is minimising.

Taking the product with \(\RR_z\) gives
\eqref{eq:R0}: for every spatial curve, the integral
triangle inequality bounds its length below by the
Euclidean norm of its cone-length contribution and its
total \(z\)-displacement. Equality is obtained by traversing
the cone minimiser and the \(z\)-segment with constant
relative speeds.

A future causal curve in the ultrastatic metric satisfies
\(|\dot x|_q\leq\dot t\), hence
\(t-t'\geq d(x,x')\). Conversely, a distance-realising
spatial curve traversed at speed at most one gives a causal
curve whenever this inequality holds. This proves
\eqref{eq:causal}.

Finally, if \(p_j\in J_M^+(K)\) and \(p_j\to p\in M\),
choose \(k_j\in K\) witnessing the relation. A subsequence
has \(k_j\to k\in K\); continuity of \(d\) preserves the
inequality. The past case is identical.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}[Local causal certificate versus global proof]
Inside a convex developing chart, a straight developed
spatial segment of length \(R_0\), together with elapsed
time \(R_0\), is null for the host metric. This is the
local certificate recorded in I-B
\cite[\SourceLabel{lem:local-causal}]{CheungIB}.
It does not by itself establish a global formula across a
missing worldsheet. Proposition~\ref{prop:distance} is a
separate global argument for the specific cone with
\(0<\alpha<1\); its causal curves never pass through
\(\WW\).
\end{remark}

\begin{proposition}[Failure of global hyperbolicity]
\label{prop:nonGH}
The spacetime \(M\) is not globally hyperbolic.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Fix \(r_*>0\), \(\varphi_*\), \(z_*\), and \(a>r_*\).
The points
\[
 p=(-a,r_*,\varphi_*,z_*),\qquad
 q=(a,r_*,\varphi_*,z_*)
\]
have in their causal diamond the sequence
\[
 p_j=(0,r_j,\varphi_*,z_*),\qquad r_j\downarrow0.
\]
Indeed, the required radial travel length is \(r_*-r_j<a\).
The sequence has no convergent subsequence in \(M\).
Thus this causal diamond is not compact.
\end{proof}

This supplies directly the diagnosis used in I-B and the
ST chart contracts \cite{CheungIB,CheungIXAST,CheungXBST}.

\subsection{Angular lifts, geometric terms, and apex length}
\label{subsec:lifts}

Choose lifts of \(\varphi,\varphi'\) to \(\RR\), and set
\[
 \vartheta=\alpha(\varphi-\varphi').
\]
Unlike \(\psi\), \(\vartheta\) is not reduced modulo
\(2\pi\alpha\). Put
\begin{align}
 \mathcal K(\vartheta)
  &=\{k\in\ZZ:\ |\vartheta-2\pi\alpha k|<\pi\},
 \nonumber\\
 R_k(\vartheta)^2
  &=r^2+r'^2
    -2rr'\cos(\vartheta-2\pi\alpha k)+\Delta z^2,
 \nonumber\\
 \rho(u)^2
  &=r^2+r'^2+2rr'\cosh u+\Delta z^2,
 \qquad u\geq0,
 \nonumber\\
 \rho_0&=\rho(0)=\sqrt{(r+r')^2+\Delta z^2}.
 \label{eq:lengths}
\end{align}
The pair is called \emph{generic} if
\[
 |\vartheta-2\pi\alpha k|\neq\pi
 \quad\text{for every }k\in\ZZ.
\]
These excluded loci are the geometric image boundaries.

If \(\vartheta=\psi\), then \(0\in\mathcal K(\psi)\), and
\begin{equation}
 d(x,x')=R_0\leq R_k<\rho_0
 \qquad(k\in\mathcal K(\psi)).
 \label{eq:ordered}
\end{equation}
At the angular cut \(|\psi|=\pi\alpha\), two shortest
geometric terms can have equal length. Thus it is not
correct globally to assert \(R_k>R_0\) for every
\(k\neq0\). The strict inequality does hold for these
additional terms in an angularly small chart defined in
Section~\ref{sec:transfer}.

\subsection{Orientation of geometric holonomy}
\label{subsec:orientation}

With the displayed developing map,
\[
 \mathrm{dev}(r,\varphi+2\pi)
 =\Rot(2\pi\alpha)\,\mathrm{dev}(r,\varphi)
 =\Rot(-\mu)\,\mathrm{dev}(r,\varphi).
\]
The inverse gluing generator is therefore
\[
 J_\mu(t,X,Y,z)=(t,\Rot(\mu)(X,Y),z).
\]
Calling \(J_\mu\) the positively oriented holonomy, as in
the I-B convention, amounts to choosing the corresponding
gluing or inverse-meridian orientation
\cite[\SourceLabel{prop:holonomy}]{CheungIB}.
Both generators fix \(t,z\); they have no translational
part. Reversing the chosen generator reverses every
holonomy sign below. The distinction is recorded rather
than hidden in the notation.

%======================================================================
\section{Flat bundles and the restricted extension ledger}
\label{sec:extensions}
%======================================================================

\subsection{Twisted sections and deficiency indices}

For \(\beta\in[0,1)\), represent a section of a flat complex
line bundle by a function on the angular cover satisfying
\begin{equation}
 u(r,\varphi+2\pi,z)=e^{2\pi\ii\beta}u(r,\varphi,z).
 \label{eq:twist}
\end{equation}
Its norm is taken over one angular period. Denote the
resulting Hilbert space by \(\HH_\beta=L^2_\beta(N,\dd V)\).
In this lifted parallel representation the flat covariant
derivative is the ordinary derivative.

Let \(A_{0,\beta}=-\Delta_q\) on compactly supported smooth
sections. Angular separation gives
\[
 u=\sum_{n\in\ZZ}
   \frac{e^{\ii(n+\beta)\varphi}}{\sqrt{2\pi\alpha}}\,
   u_n(r,z),
 \qquad
 \nu_n=\frac{|n+\beta|}{\alpha}.
\]
The radial expression on \(L^2((0,\infty),r\,\dd r)\) is
\begin{equation}
 \ell_\nu
 =-\partial_r^2-\frac1r\partial_r+\frac{\nu^2}{r^2}.
 \label{eq:radial}
\end{equation}

\begin{lemma}[Deficiency count]
\label{lem:deficiency}
The expression \(\ell_\nu\) is limit circle at zero
exactly when \(0\leq\nu<1\), and is limit point at infinity.
The transverse minimal operator has deficiency indices
\((d_\beta,d_\beta)\), where
\[
 d_\beta=\#\{n\in\ZZ:\ |n+\beta|<\alpha\}.
\]
In particular:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item \(d_0=1\), with deficient mode \(n=0\).
\item For \(0<\beta<1\), only \(n=0,-1\) can be
deficient. They are deficient respectively when
\(\beta<\alpha\) and \(1-\beta<\alpha\).
\item Two deficient modes occur precisely when
\(1-\alpha<\beta<\alpha\), which requires \(\alpha>1/2\).
\end{enumerate}
The full minimal operator on \(N\) has infinite
deficiency indices if \(d_\beta>0\), and is essentially
self-adjoint if \(d_\beta=0\).
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
At zero the solutions at spectral parameter zero are
\(r^\nu,r^{-\nu}\) for \(\nu>0\), and \(1,\log r\) for
\(\nu=0\). Both are square integrable with weight \(r\)
exactly for \(\nu<1\). At infinity the expression is
limit point, for example after conjugating by
\(f\mapsto r^{1/2}f\) to the half-line Schr\"odinger
expression
\[
 -\partial_r^2+(\nu^2-\tfrac14)r^{-2}.
\]
Weyl's alternative gives the radial assertion
\cite{ReedSimonII,DerezinskiRichard}. Counting the angular
modes gives the transverse indices.

Fourier transformation in \(z\) gives the radial
expressions shifted by \(k_z^2\).
When a deficient transverse mode exists, its boundary
data may vary over an infinite-dimensional space of
longitudinal functions. If no such mode exists, the
direct integral of the unique self-adjoint fibre
closures is the closure of the full operator.
\end{proof}

\begin{assumption}[Product and rotation-diagonal restriction]
\label{ass:product}
We consider only extensions of the form
\begin{equation}
 B=B_\perp\otimes1+
      1\otimes(-\partial_z^2)+m^2,
 \label{eq:product}
\end{equation}
where \(B_\perp\) is a self-adjoint extension of the
transverse minimal operator and commutes with rotations.
The transverse boundary parameters are independent of
\(k_z\).
\end{assumption}

This restriction is stronger than rotation and
\(z\)-translation invariance alone. Such invariance can
also permit measurable \(k_z\)-dependent boundary
conditions. Those extensions, longitudinally nonlocal
conditions, and non-product extensions are not classified
here.

The rotation characters \(e^{\ii(n+\beta)\gamma}\) are
distinct. Thus \(B_\perp\) is diagonal in \(n\).
Fixing a reference length \(\ell_0>0\), the deficient
radial domains have boundary coefficients of the form
\[
 \begin{array}{ll}
 \nu=0:
   & f(r)=a\log(r/\ell_0)+b+o(1),\\[2pt]
 0<\nu<1:
   & f(r)=a r^{-\nu}+b r^\nu+o(r^\nu).
 \end{array}
\]
The coefficients can equivalently be defined by limiting
Wronskians. The corresponding Green boundary form shows
that the self-adjoint one-mode conditions are:
\begin{itemize}
\item \(\nu=0\): the Friedrichs condition \(a=0\), or
\[
 \mathsf L_L:\qquad f(r)=a\log(r/L)+o(1),
 \qquad 0<L<\infty;
\]
\item \(0<\nu<1\): the Friedrichs condition \(a=0\),
or
\[
 \mathsf E_\lambda:\qquad b=\lambda a,
 \qquad \lambda\in\RR.
\]
We also write \(\lambda=\infty\) for Friedrichs.
\end{itemize}
Indeed, for \(0<\nu<1\) the boundary form is a nonzero
real multiple of
\(\overline a_f b_g-\overline b_f a_g\), so its
one-dimensional self-adjoint subspaces have exactly this
real projective parametrisation. The logarithmic case is
analogous.

\subsection{Positivity and the longitudinal spectral bands}

\begin{theorem}[Corrected positivity ledger]
\label{thm:positivity}
Under Assumption~\ref{ass:product}, the following hold.
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item The Friedrichs extension \(A_{F,\beta}\) of
\(-\Delta_q\) is nonnegative. Its form domain is the
closure of compactly supported smooth sections in
\[
 \norm{u}^2+\norm{\nabla_\beta u}^2.
\]
\item In the logarithmic mode, \(\mathsf L_L\) has
exactly one transverse negative eigenvalue
\[
 -\kappa_L^2,\qquad
 \kappa_L=\frac{2e^{-\gamma_E}}{L},
\]
with radial eigenfunction \(K_0(\kappa_L r)\).
\item In a mode \(0<\nu<1\), \(\mathsf E_\lambda\)
has a transverse negative eigenvalue exactly when
\(\lambda<0\). It is unique in that mode and is
\(-\kappa^2\), where
\begin{equation}
 \lambda=
 \frac{\Gamma(-\nu)}{\Gamma(\nu)}
       \left(\frac{\kappa}{2}\right)^{2\nu}.
 \label{eq:kappa}
\end{equation}
For \(\lambda\in[0,\infty]\) the transverse extension
is nonnegative.
\item Every transverse ledger extension has essential
spectrum \([0,\infty)\), with only the finitely many
negative eigenvalues just described below it.
Let
\[
 \kappa_*=\max\bigl(\{0\}\cup
       \{\kappa_j:\ -\kappa_j^2
          \text{ is a transverse negative eigenvalue}\}\bigr).
\]
Then the full product operator satisfies
\begin{equation}
 \spec(B)=\spec_{\mathrm{ess}}(B)
       =[m^2-\kappa_*^2,\infty),
 \qquad
 B\geq0\ \Longleftrightarrow\ m\geq\kappa_*.
 \label{eq:full-spectrum}
\end{equation}
The full operator has no \(L^2(N)\) point spectrum.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
The first assertion is the Friedrichs construction applied
to the nonnegative covariant Dirichlet form
\cite{ReedSimonII}.

At a negative radial energy \(-\kappa^2\), square
integrability at infinity forces the solution to be a
multiple of \(K_\nu(\kappa r)\). For \(\nu=0\),
\[
 K_0(\kappa r)
 =-\log(\kappa r/2)-\gamma_E+o(1)
 =-\log(r/L)+o(1)
\]
if and only if \(L=2e^{-\gamma_E}/\kappa\).
This gives one and only one negative eigenvalue for
each finite \(L\).

For \(0<\nu<1\),
\[
 K_\nu(\kappa r)
 =\frac{\Gamma(\nu)}2
       \left(\frac{\kappa r}{2}\right)^{-\nu}
  +\frac{\Gamma(-\nu)}2
       \left(\frac{\kappa r}{2}\right)^\nu
  +o(r^\nu).
\]
The ratio of the two boundary coefficients is
\eqref{eq:kappa}. Since \(\Gamma(-\nu)<0\), its
right-hand side is a bijection from \(\kappa>0\)
onto \(\lambda<0\).

The Friedrichs radial spectrum is \([0,\infty)\),
as follows from the Bessel spectral transform.
Changing finitely many endpoint conditions gives a
finite-rank transverse resolvent difference, so it
does not change the transverse essential spectrum.
The preceding square-integrable solutions account for
all negative eigenvalues. There is no transverse zero
eigenfunction: the solution permitted at zero cannot
also be square integrable at infinity. These facts also
follow from the explicit half-line analysis in
\cite{DerezinskiRichard}.

Fourier transformation in \(z\) turns \(B\) into the
direct integral of \(B_\perp+k_z^2+m^2\). Each transverse
bound state therefore generates a continuous band
\([m^2-\kappa_j^2,\infty)\), not a full-space bound
eigenfunction. The transverse continuum generates
\([m^2,\infty)\). Their union is
\eqref{eq:full-spectrum}. For any fixed spectral value,
the equation \(k_z^2+\lambda+m^2=E\) holds on a
Lebesgue-null set of \(k_z\) for each transverse
spectral value \(\lambda\); the direct-integral
spectral representation therefore has no full-space
eigenvectors.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}[What the mass can and cannot cure]
For \(m=0,\beta=0\), Friedrichs is the only nonnegative
extension in this ledger. For \(m>0\), a logarithmic
extension is nonnegative precisely when
\(m\geq\kappa_L\). The same mass-shift qualification
applies to every \(\lambda<0\) power-law mode.
It would be incorrect to label all such massive
operators ``not nonnegative'' merely because their
transverse extension has a negative eigenvalue.
\end{remark}

The geometry does not select \(L\), \(\lambda\), or the
Friedrichs choice. The latter is the finite-energy
closure of compactly supported data. Kay--Studer's
discussion \cite{KayStuder} supplies physical context,
not an additional premise selecting an extension.

%======================================================================
\section{Green operators on an extension-dependent spectral domain}
\label{sec:green}
%======================================================================

Let \(B\) be any extension in the restricted ledger.
By Theorem~\ref{thm:positivity}, \(B\) is bounded below.
Choose \(b>0\) so that \(B+b\geq1\), and define
\[
 \Dinf_B=\bigcap_{k=0}^\infty\dom(B^k),
 \qquad
 p_k(v)=\norm{(B+b)^k v}.
\]
This is a Fr\'echet space; its topology is independent
of the admissible shift \(b\). Put
\[
 \Dtc_B=C_c^\infty(\RR;\Dinf_B),
 \qquad
 \Espace_B=C^\infty(\RR;\Dinf_B).
\]
The first space has its usual inductive-limit topology
over compact time supports; it is not asserted to be a
Fr\'echet space.

For real \(\lambda\) set
\[
 w_t(\lambda)=
 \begin{cases}
 \sin(t\sqrt{\lambda})/\sqrt{\lambda},&\lambda>0,\\
 t,&\lambda=0,\\
 \sinh(t\sqrt{-\lambda})/\sqrt{-\lambda},&\lambda<0,
 \end{cases}
 \qquad W_B(t)=w_t(B).
\]
The spectral multiplier is bounded for each fixed \(t\)
because \(B\) is bounded below. Functional calculus,
rather than convergence of an operator power series on
arbitrary smooth vectors, is the definition.

\begin{definition}[Retarded, advanced, and causal operators]
\label{def:Green}
For \(f\in\Dtc_B\), define
\begin{align}
 (G_+^Bf)(t)
   &=\int_{-\infty}^t W_B(t-s)f(s)\,\dd s,
 \nonumber\\
 (G_-^Bf)(t)
   &=-\int_t^\infty W_B(t-s)f(s)\,\dd s
     =\int_t^\infty W_B(s-t)f(s)\,\dd s,
 \nonumber\\
 E_B&=G_+^B-G_-^B.
 \label{eq:Green}
\end{align}
Thus, in time-convolution notation,
\[
 G_\pm^B(t)=\pm\theta(\pm t)W_B(t).
\]
The minus sign in the first advanced integral is essential.
\end{definition}

\begin{theorem}[Green identities and spectral exactness]
\label{thm:green}
For every restricted ledger extension \(B\):
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item Compactly supported smooth spacetime sections
belong continuously to \(\Dtc_B\), and
\[
 G_\pm^B:\Dtc_B\longrightarrow\Espace_B
\]
are continuous.
\item With \(P_B=\partial_t^2+B\),
\[
 P_BG_\pm^Bf=G_\pm^BP_Bf=f
 \qquad(f\in\Dtc_B).
\]
On compactly supported smooth sections, \(P_B=P_m\).
\item \(G_+^Bf\) vanishes before the time support of
\(f\), and \(G_-^Bf\) vanishes after it.
\item The sequence
\begin{equation}
 0\longrightarrow\Dtc_B
 \xrightarrow{P_B}\Dtc_B
 \xrightarrow{E_B}\Espace_B
 \xrightarrow{P_B}\Espace_B
 \longrightarrow0
 \label{eq:exact}
\end{equation}
is exact.
\item In the Hermitian spacetime pairing,
\[
 \pair{g}{G_+^Bf}
 =\pair{G_-^Bg}{f},
 \qquad
 \pair{g}{E_Bf}=-\pair{E_Bg}{f}
 \qquad(f,g\in\Dtc_B).
\]
These are formal adjoint identities on the stated test
domain, not assertions of self-adjointness or
skew-adjointness of unbounded spacetime operators.
\item Every \(G_\pm^Bf\) is smooth on the regular
spacetime \(M\).
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
The spatial differential expression maps compactly
supported smooth sections to themselves. Every such
section therefore lies in every power domain of \(B\).
The same statement with compact-support seminorm
estimates proves the asserted continuous inclusion.

On compact time intervals the multipliers \(w_t\) and
\(\partial_tw_t\) are bounded uniformly on the spectrum;
higher time derivatives are controlled by finitely many
additional graph seminorms. Differentiation under the
integral in \eqref{eq:Green} consequently gives
\[
 W_B(0)=0,\qquad
 \dot W_B(0)=\id,\qquad
 \ddot W_B(t)=-BW_B(t)
\]
on \(\Dinf_B\). Duhamel differentiation proves the right
inverse identities. Integration by parts in \(s\), using
compact time support, proves the left inverse identities.
The support-in-time assertions are immediate.

For completeness, the homogeneous Cauchy problem is
unique in \(\Espace_B\): applying bounded spectral
projections of \(B\) reduces it to a bounded-operator
Cauchy problem; the projections tend strongly to the
identity. Its solution with data \(u_0,u_1\in\Dinf_B\) is
\[
 u(t)=\dot W_B(t)u_0+W_B(t)u_1.
\]

If \(P_Bu=0\) and \(u\) has compact time support, then
\(u=G_+^BP_Bu=0\), so the first arrow in
\eqref{eq:exact} is injective. The inverse identities
give \(E_BP_B=0\) and \(P_BE_B=0\).
If \(E_Bf=0\), then \(u=G_+^Bf=G_-^Bf\) has time
support in the compact interval spanning \(\supp_t f\),
and \(P_Bu=f\). This proves exactness at the second
space.

If \(P_Bu=0\), choose \(\chi\in C^\infty(\RR)\) equal
to zero for \(t<0\) and one for \(t>1\), and set
\[
 f=P_B(\chi u)=[P_B,\chi]u\in\Dtc_B.
\]
Cauchy uniqueness gives
\[
 G_+^Bf=\chi u,\qquad
 G_-^Bf=-(1-\chi)u,
\]
hence \(E_Bf=u\). Finally, for arbitrary
\(v\in\Espace_B\),
\[
 u(t)=\int_0^t W_B(t-s)v(s)\,\dd s
\]
is a smooth spectral-domain solution of \(P_Bu=v\).
This proves the last surjectivity.

Since \(W_B(t)^*=W_B(t)\) and \(W_B(-t)=-W_B(t)\),
Fubini's theorem on the compact time supports of the
paired tests gives the adjoint identities.

Interior elliptic regularity gives continuous local
embeddings
\[
 \dom(B^k)\hookrightarrow H_{\mathrm{loc}}^{2k}(N).
\]
Together with the spectral time regularity, these imply
smoothness on \(M\).
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}[The unresolved compact-spacetime sequence]
\label{rem:compact-exact}
The exact sequence \eqref{eq:exact} depends on \(B\).
It is not an exactness theorem on the usual
compact-spacetime test space. On that space we have proved
only
\[
 P_mC_c^\infty(M)
 \subseteq\ker E_B\cap C_c^\infty(M).
\]
The reverse inclusion is not established here. A
time-compact spectral solution need not have support
bounded away from the removed worldsheet. This distinction
must not be erased when comparing with Minkowski equation
quotients or free-field algebras.
\end{remark}

%======================================================================
\section{Finite propagation for the Friedrichs extension}
\label{sec:speed}
%======================================================================

\begin{theorem}[Intrinsic finite propagation]
\label{thm:speed}
Let \(B=A_{F,\beta}+m^2\). For every compactly supported
smooth spacetime section \(f\),
\begin{equation}
 \supp G_\pm^Bf\subseteq J_M^\pm(\supp f).
 \label{eq:finite-speed}
\end{equation}
The causal relation is the intrinsic relation
\eqref{eq:causal}, not an auxiliary completion relation.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
We prove the domain-of-dependence statement for the
homogeneous equation and then use Duhamel's formula.

Let \(u(0)=u_0,\dot u(0)=u_1\), with smooth spectral data
vanishing on \(B_d(x_0,\varrho)\). For \(t\geq0\), choose
a smooth nonincreasing \(\phi_\epsilon\), equal to one
on \((-\infty,-\epsilon]\) and zero on \([0,\infty)\),
and put
\[
 \chi_t(x)=\phi_\epsilon(d(x,x_0)+t-\varrho).
\]
The distance is Lipschitz and
\(|\nabla d|\leq1\) almost everywhere.

Multiplication by bounded Lipschitz functions with bounded
gradient preserves the Friedrichs form domain \(Q_F\).
Indeed, approximate a form-domain section by compactly
supported smooth sections, apply the Leibniz estimate,
and smooth the multiplier on the compact regular
supports. Thus all integrations by parts below are
identities in the closed form, including when the
support of \(\chi_t\) approaches the apex.

Use the augmented local energy
\[
 e=|\dot u|^2+|\nabla_\beta u|^2+(m^2+1)|u|^2,
 \qquad
 \mathcal E(t)=\int_N\chi_t e\,\dd V.
\]
The extra \(|u|^2\) term also handles the massless case.
The form identity for \(B\) yields
\begin{align*}
 \mathcal E'(t)
 ={}&\int(\partial_t\chi_t)e\,\dd V
 -2\operatorname{Re}\int
      \overline{\dot u}\,
      \nabla\chi_t\cdot\nabla_\beta u\,\dd V\\
 &+2\operatorname{Re}\int\chi_t\overline u\dot u\,\dd V.
\end{align*}
Since \(\phi_\epsilon'\leq0\),
\[
 \int(\partial_t\chi_t)e
 -2\operatorname{Re}\int
       \overline{\dot u}\nabla\chi_t\cdot\nabla_\beta u
 \leq
 \int\phi_\epsilon'
       \bigl(e-2|\dot u||\nabla_\beta u|\bigr)\leq0.
\]
Also \(2|u\dot u|\leq |u|^2+|\dot u|^2\leq e\).
Hence
\[
 \mathcal E'(t)\leq\mathcal E(t),\qquad \mathcal E(0)=0.
\]
Gronwall's inequality gives \(\mathcal E(t)=0\).
Letting \(\epsilon\downarrow0\) proves that \(u(t)\)
vanishes on \(B_d(x_0,\varrho-t)\). Time reversal gives
the negative-time statement.

It follows that \(W_B(t)\) propagates spatial support by
at most \(|t|\). Duhamel's formula then gives
\eqref{eq:finite-speed}; closedness of
\(J_M^\pm(\supp f)\) was proved in
Proposition~\ref{prop:distance}.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}[Why no apex flux was discarded]
The argument uses the closed Friedrichs form rather than
an integration over \(r>\epsilon\) followed by an
unjustified boundary limit. It does not prove finite
propagation for the general \(\mathsf L_L\) or
\(\mathsf E_\lambda\) domains. The special
\(\mathsf E_0\) case is treated separately below.
The result is consistent with the general conic
diffraction theory of Cheeger--Taylor
\cite{CheegerTaylor1,CheegerTaylor2}.
\end{remark}

%======================================================================
\section{The Sommerfeld--Carslaw--Dowker kernel}
\label{sec:closed}
%======================================================================

In this section \(B=A_{F,\beta}+m^2\), and all spatial
kernels are relative to \(\dd V\).

\subsection{The diffraction weight}

For \(u>0\), define
\begin{equation}
 \Phi_\beta(u,\vartheta)
 =\sum_{n\in\ZZ}
   \sin(\pi\nu_n)e^{-\nu_nu}
           e^{\ii(n+\beta)\vartheta/\alpha}.
 \label{eq:Phi}
\end{equation}
This series converges absolutely.

\begin{lemma}[Closed weight and its boundary control]
\label{lem:Phi}
Set
\[
 a=\frac{\pi}{\alpha},\qquad
 b=\frac{u}{\alpha},\qquad
 \xi=\frac{\vartheta}{\alpha},
\]
and
\[
 F(\gamma,w)=\frac1{2\ii}
 \left(
 \frac{e^{\gamma(w+\ii a)}}{1-e^{w+\ii a}}
 -
 \frac{e^{\gamma(w-\ii a)}}{1-e^{w-\ii a}}
 \right).
\]
Then
\begin{equation}
 \Phi_\beta(u,\vartheta)
 =F(\beta,-b+\ii\xi)
  +F(1-\beta,-b-\ii\xi).
 \label{eq:Phi-closed}
\end{equation}
At a generic angle this extends continuously to \(u=0\).
For \(\beta=0\),
\begin{equation}
 \Phi_0(u,\vartheta)=\frac12D_\alpha(u,\vartheta),
 \qquad
 D_\alpha=
 \sum_{\pm}
 \frac{\sin((\pi\pm\vartheta)/\alpha)}
      {\cosh(u/\alpha)-\cos((\pi\pm\vartheta)/\alpha)}.
 \label{eq:Carslaw}
\end{equation}
The function \(\Phi_\beta\) is jointly locally integrable
in \((u,\vartheta)\) up to \(u=0\), including image
boundaries, and decays exponentially as \(u\to\infty\).
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Split the series into \(n\geq0\) and \(n\leq-1\), and
write \(\sin x=(e^{\ii x}-e^{-\ii x})/(2\ii)\).
The resulting two geometric sums give
\eqref{eq:Phi-closed}; the \(n=0,\beta=0\) contribution
is zero. Combining conjugate geometric denominators
gives \eqref{eq:Carslaw}.

The possible boundary poles are precisely
\(\vartheta\pm\pi\in2\pi\alpha\ZZ\).
Near each such angle \(\vartheta_j\), the closed form is
bounded by a constant times
\[
 1+\bigl(u^2+(\vartheta-\vartheta_j)^2\bigr)^{-1/2}.
\]
This is locally integrable in the two variables.
Away from those angles, all denominators remain nonzero
at \(u=0\).

For \(0<\beta<1\), exponential decay follows with rate
at least \(\min(\beta,1-\beta)/\alpha\).
For \(\beta=0\), the zero mode does not contribute, and
a rate \(1/\alpha\) suffices.
\end{proof}

The untwisted expression is the Carslaw weight; the
twisted version is the corresponding cone-flux
construction \cite{Carslaw1899,Carslaw1920,Dowker1977,
Dowker1987}.

\subsection{A precise class of kernel identities}

We do not assert a master formula for arbitrary bounded
Borel functions. The following theorem concerns the heat
semigroup, the positive resolvent, and the retarded wave
kernel, with the latter interpreted distributionally.

For any radial flat kernel \(F(R)\) for which the
following expression is defined, write
\begin{equation}
 \mathcal S_\beta[F]
 =\sum_{k\in\mathcal K(\vartheta)}
       e^{2\pi\ii\beta k}F(R_k)
  -\frac1{\pi\alpha}
       \int_0^\infty\Phi_\beta(u,\vartheta)F(\rho(u))\,\dd u.
 \label{eq:master}
\end{equation}

\begin{theorem}[Heat, resolvent, and wave representation]
\label{thm:closed}
The following identities hold.
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item The massless spatial heat kernel is
\begin{align}
 H_\beta(\tau;x,x')
 ={}&\frac{e^{-\Delta z^2/(4\tau)}}{\sqrt{4\pi\tau}}\,
      \frac{e^{-(r^2+r'^2)/(4\tau)}}{4\pi\alpha\tau}
 \nonumber\\
 &\times\sum_{n\in\ZZ}
    e^{\ii(n+\beta)(\varphi-\varphi')}
        I_{\nu_n}\left(\frac{rr'}{2\tau}\right),
 \qquad \tau>0.
 \label{eq:modes}
\end{align}
At generic pairs, the heat kernel of \(B\) equals
\[
 \mathcal S_\beta\left[
      (4\pi\tau)^{-3/2}e^{-m^2\tau-R^2/(4\tau)}
                  \right].
\item For \(s>0\), the kernel of \((B+s^2)^{-1}\) is
\[
 \mathcal S_\beta\left[
   \frac{e^{-\sqrt{s^2+m^2}\,R}}{4\pi R}
                 \right].
\item Let \(F_m^+(t,R)\) be the flat retarded kernel of
\(\partial_t^2-\Delta_{\RR^3}+m^2\). For \(R>0\),
\begin{equation}
 F_m^+(t,R)
 =\frac{\delta(t-R)}{4\pi R}
 -\theta(t-R)\,
   \frac{mJ_1(m\sqrt{t^2-R^2})}
        {4\pi\sqrt{t^2-R^2}},
 \label{eq:flat-massive}
\end{equation}
where the second term is zero at \(m=0\), and its
quotient has its continuous value at the front.
The intrinsic retarded kernel is
\begin{equation}
 G_+(t;x,x')=\mathcal S_\beta[F_m^+(t,\cdot)].
 \label{eq:wave-master}
\end{equation}
For \(m=0\), at a generic pair,
\begin{equation}
 G_+(t;x,x')
 =\sum_{k\in\mathcal K(\vartheta)}
     e^{2\pi\ii\beta k}\frac{\delta(t-R_k)}{4\pi R_k}
 -\theta(t-\rho_0)
   \frac{\Phi_\beta(u_0,\vartheta)}
        {4\pi^2\alpha rr'\sinh u_0},
 \label{eq:massless}
\end{equation}
with
\[
 \cosh u_0
 =\frac{t^2-r^2-r'^2-\Delta z^2}{2rr'}.
\]
The last term means its locally integrable
one-sided extension at \(t=\rho_0\).
\item The formulas are globally bundle-valued distribution
identities with the joint-integration prescription in the
proof. No arbitrary pointwise value at an image boundary
is required. The advanced kernel is
\[
 G_-(t;x,x')=G_+(-t;x,x').
\]
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
\emph{Step 1: the mode heat kernel.}
The Friedrichs radial operator is diagonalised by the
Bessel transform with kernel \(J_\nu(kr)\).
Weber's exponential integral gives
\[
 \int_0^\infty e^{-\tau k^2}
       J_\nu(kr)J_\nu(kr')\,k\,\dd k
 =\frac1{2\tau}e^{-(r^2+r'^2)/(4\tau)}
       I_\nu\left(\frac{rr'}{2\tau}\right).
\]
Together with the angular normalization and the
one-dimensional longitudinal heat kernel, this proves
\eqref{eq:modes}. We use the classical integral in
\cite{Watson}; equivalent Bessel identities are recorded
in \cite{DLMF}.

\emph{Step 2: the angular summation.}
For \(\zeta>0\), set
\[
 S(\zeta,\vartheta)
 =\sum_n I_{\nu_n}(\zeta)
          e^{\ii(n+\beta)\vartheta/\alpha}.
\]
Use the integral representation
\[
 I_\nu(\zeta)
 =\frac1\pi\int_0^\pi e^{\zeta\cos v}\cos(\nu v)\,\dd v
 -\frac{\sin(\pi\nu)}{\pi}
      \int_0^\infty e^{-\zeta\cosh u-\nu u}\,\dd u,
\]
valid for the present parameters
\cite{Watson,DLMF}.
The first integral is the \(n\)-th twisted Fourier
coefficient of the piecewise smooth function
\[
 h_\zeta(\vartheta)
 =\alpha\sum_{k\in\ZZ}
       e^{2\pi\ii\beta k}
       e^{\zeta\cos(\vartheta-2\pi\alpha k)}
       \mathbf1_{\{|\vartheta-2\pi\alpha k|<\pi\}}.
\]
Indeed, integrating over one angular period and changing
variables in each summand gives the coefficient
\[
 \frac1{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}
    e^{\zeta\cos v}e^{-\ii(n+\beta)v/\alpha}\,\dd v.
\]
Its imaginary part vanishes, and its real part is the
first Bessel integral.

Insert the Abel factor \(e^{-\epsilon\nu_n}\).
The first Fourier series tends to \(h_\zeta\) at every
generic angle and in local angular \(L^1\).
The second becomes
\[
 -\frac1\pi\int_0^\infty
      e^{-\zeta\cosh u}\Phi_\beta(u+\epsilon,\vartheta)\,\dd u.
\]
Lemma~\ref{lem:Phi} supplies local joint integrability,
uniformly for small \(\epsilon\); at infinity the
factor \(e^{-\zeta\cosh u}\) dominates.
Hence
\begin{equation}
 S(\zeta,\vartheta)
 =\alpha\sum_{k\in\mathcal K(\vartheta)}
       e^{2\pi\ii\beta k}
       e^{\zeta\cos(\vartheta-2\pi\alpha k)}
 -\frac1\pi\int_0^\infty
       e^{-\zeta\cosh u}\Phi_\beta(u,\vartheta)\,\dd u.
 \label{eq:Sommerfeld}
\end{equation}
Multiplying by the remaining factors in
\eqref{eq:modes}, with \(\zeta=rr'/(2\tau)\), proves
the heat identity.

\emph{Step 3: the resolvent.}
Since \(B\geq0\),
\[
 (B+s^2)^{-1}
 =\int_0^\infty e^{-\tau s^2}e^{-\tau B}\,\dd\tau.
\]
The flat heat integral is
\(e^{-\sqrt{s^2+m^2}R}/(4\pi R)\).
For generic pairs the diffraction weight is bounded at
\(u=0\), and the exponential in \(\rho(u)\) controls
infinity. After compact spatial smearing, the joint
bound in Lemma~\ref{lem:Phi} justifies the same
interchanges across image boundaries. This proves the
resolvent formula.

\emph{Step 4: the global wave distribution.}
Define the right-hand side of \eqref{eq:wave-master}
first by joint testing in time and the spatial pair.
The geometric terms are the usual flat wave
distributions on the indicated angular sectors, with
their locally integrable sector indicators.

For the diffracted term, compact time support bounds
\(u\): \(F_m^+(t,\rho(u))\) vanishes unless
\(\rho(u)\) is no larger than the largest positive time
in the test support. On compact regular spatial sets,
\(\rho(u)\geq r+r'>0\). After time testing,
\[
 \left\langle F_m^+(t,\rho),a(t)\right\rangle
\]
is a bounded smooth function of \(\rho>0\) on the
relevant compact range. Lemma~\ref{lem:Phi} therefore
makes the joint \(u\)-angular integration locally
integrable, including at \(u=0\) and an image boundary.
This gives an unambiguous global distribution.

Its Laplace transform is the resolvent formula from
Step 3, because
\[
 \int_0^\infty e^{-st}F_m^+(t,R)\,\dd t
 =\frac{e^{-\sqrt{s^2+m^2}R}}{4\pi R}.
\]
On the spectral side,
\[
 \int_0^\infty e^{-st}W_B(t)\,\dd t
 =(B+s^2)^{-1}.
\]
Both sides are causal distributions of at most
polynomial growth after compact spatial smearing.
Injectivity of the Laplace transform therefore proves
\eqref{eq:wave-master} globally.

For \(m=0\), integrating the delta in \(u\) uses
\[
 \rho'(u)=\frac{rr'\sinh u}{\rho(u)}.
\]
This gives \eqref{eq:massless}. At a generic pair,
\(\Phi_\beta\) is bounded at zero and the resulting
edge is of order \((t-\rho_0)^{-1/2}\).
Finally, the advanced identity follows from
Definition~\ref{def:Green} and oddness of \(W_B\).
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}[Why a null-set argument would not suffice]
The extension across image boundaries in the proof is a
joint-distribution construction. It is not justified
merely by saying that the exceptional angular pairs have
measure zero: a distribution can be supported on such a
set. The heat and resolvent identities, together with
Laplace uniqueness, fix the global distribution.
\end{remark}

\subsection{Bundle covariance and local gauges}

The kernel is a section of
\(\operatorname{Hom}(L_{\beta,x'},L_{\beta,x})\).
For example,
\[
 G_+(t;r,\varphi+2\pi,z;x')
 =e^{2\pi\ii\beta}G_+(t;r,\varphi,z;x').
\]
If
\[
 \vartheta=\psi+2\pi\alpha\ell,\qquad \ell\in\ZZ,
\]
then every formula reduced to \(\psi\) acquires the
overall factor
\begin{equation}
 G_+(t;\vartheta)=e^{2\pi\ii\beta\ell}G_+(t;\psi).
 \label{eq:lift-factor}
\end{equation}
The same identity holds for \(\Phi_\beta\).
Omitting this factor would destroy bundle covariance.

On a simply connected chart, the lifted representation
is a \emph{parallel trivialisation}; the differential
operator is the ordinary scalar Klein--Gordon operator.
By contrast, the periodic gauge
\[
 v=e^{-\ii\beta\varphi}u
\]
has covariant derivative
\(\partial_\varphi+\ii\beta\), and its kernel is
\[
 K_{\mathrm{per}}(x,x')
 =e^{-\ii\beta\varphi}K_{\mathrm{par}}(x,x')
      e^{\ii\beta\varphi'}.
\]
In that gauge the direct term has the corresponding
endpoint phase. It is not the ordinary flat kernel with
unit direct weight. All flat comparisons below use a
local parallel trivialisation.

\subsection{Kernel structure and qualifications}

\begin{corollary}[Geometric and diffracted contributions]
\label{cor:structure}
For the Friedrichs extension:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item In a lift with \(\vartheta=\psi\), the \(k=0\)
term is the direct flat term at \(d(x,x')=R_0\).
Every additional geometric term arrives at \(R_k\geq R_0\).
\item The diffracted contribution is supported in
\(t\geq\rho_0\). At a generic pair its massless front
coefficient is
\begin{equation}
 \lim_{t\downarrow\rho_0}
   \sqrt{t^2-\rho_0^2}\,G_+^{\mathrm{dif}}(t;x,x')
 =-\frac{\Phi_\beta(0,\vartheta)}
          {4\pi^2\alpha\sqrt{rr'}}.
 \label{eq:front}
\end{equation}
This coefficient may vanish for a particular pair.
A nonzero diffraction weight gives a late-time
contribution, but not necessarily a nonzero value at
every angle and every later time.
\item The diffraction weight vanishes identically
precisely when
\begin{equation}
 \frac1\alpha=N\in\NN,\qquad N\beta\in\ZZ.
 \label{eq:pure-images}
\end{equation}
In this case the kernel is the finite character-weighted
\(N\)-image kernel of the corresponding cyclic quotient.
For \(\beta=0,\alpha=1/2\),
\[
 G_+(t;x,x')
 =F_m^+(t,R_0)+F_m^+(t,\overline R),
\]
where
\[
 \overline R^2=r^2+r'^2+2rr'\cos\psi+\Delta z^2.
\]
\item Every term is supported in the intrinsic causal
future. At an angular cut, two geometric fronts can
lie on its boundary. Away from that cut, only the
shortest geometric front does so.
\end{enumerate}
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
The support assertions follow from
\eqref{eq:ordered} and \eqref{eq:wave-master}.
Near \(t=\rho_0\),
\[
 \sinh u_0
 \sim\frac{\sqrt{t^2-\rho_0^2}}{\sqrt{rr'}},
\]
which proves \eqref{eq:front}.

If \eqref{eq:pure-images} holds, every
\(\sin(\pi\nu_n)\) vanishes. Conversely, if
\(\Phi_\beta\) vanishes identically, its absolutely
convergent angular Fourier series at each \(u>0\)
has zero coefficients, so every \(\nu_n\) is an integer.
The successive positive orders differ by \(1/\alpha\);
therefore \(1/\alpha\) is an integer, and
\(\beta/\alpha=N\beta\) is an integer.
For a generic angle the geometric interval contains
exactly \(N\) indices. The remaining statements follow
from the length comparison and
Proposition~\ref{prop:distance}.
\end{proof}

For \(m=0\), the flat kernel satisfies Huygens'
principle, whereas nonzero diffraction produces a
wake beyond the geometric fronts. This does not mean
propagation outside the intrinsic causal relation.
With nontrivial flux, diffraction can persist even
at an untwisted pure-image cone; it disappears there
only for the compatible characters in
\eqref{eq:pure-images}
\cite{AharonovBohm,Dowker1987}.

\subsection{The scale-invariant non-Friedrichs choice}

\begin{proposition}[The extension \(\mathsf E_0\)]
\label{prop:E0}
Use \(\mathsf E_0\) in one deficient mode
\(n\), with \(0<\nu=\nu_n<1\), and Friedrichs in the
other modes. Then \(B\geq0\), and
\begin{align}
 G_+^B-G_+^F
 ={}&\frac{2\sin(\pi\nu)}{\pi\alpha}
       e^{\ii(n+\beta)(\varphi-\varphi')}
 \nonumber\\
 &\times\int_0^\infty
       \cosh(\nu u)F_m^+(t,\rho(u))\,\dd u.
 \label{eq:E0}
\end{align}
This is a global distribution identity. The correction
is supported in \(t\geq\rho_0\), so this extension
also has finite propagation speed.
For \(m=0\), the correction at its smooth points is
\[
 \theta(t-\rho_0)
 \frac{2\sin(\pi\nu)}{\pi\alpha}
 e^{\ii(n+\beta)(\varphi-\varphi')}
 \frac{\cosh(\nu u_0)}
      {4\pi rr'\sinh u_0}.
\]
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
The homogeneous endpoint choice \(b=0\) is diagonalised
by the Bessel transform of order \(-\nu>-1\), with
regularised eigenfunctions \(J_{-\nu}(kr)\).
The corresponding half-line self-adjoint transform is
part of the homogeneous inverse-square analysis
\cite{DerezinskiRichard}. Weber's heat integral replaces
\(I_\nu\) by \(I_{-\nu}\). Now use
\[
 I_{-\nu}(\zeta)-I_\nu(\zeta)
 =\frac2\pi\sin(\pi\nu)K_\nu(\zeta),
 \qquad
 K_\nu(\zeta)
 =\int_0^\infty e^{-\zeta\cosh u}\cosh(\nu u)\,\dd u
\]
\cite{Watson,DLMF}.
The angular normalization gives the coefficient in
\eqref{eq:E0}. The heat integral converges
superexponentially in \(u\), and Laplace inversion as
in Theorem~\ref{thm:closed} gives the wave identity.
After compact time testing the \(u\)-range is bounded,
so the correction is globally well defined.
Its support is \(t\geq\rho_0\geq d(x,x')\).
Positivity follows from
Theorem~\ref{thm:positivity}.
\end{proof}

%======================================================================
\section{Three distinct holonomy ledgers}
\label{sec:holonomy}
%======================================================================

\subsection{Geometric holonomy}

The geometric deck or gluing rotation is \(J_\mu\), with
the orientation convention in
Section~\ref{subsec:orientation}. It rotates the developed
transverse plane and fixes \(t,z\). The spinless,
zero-translation comparison in VIII-ST
\cite[\SourceLabel{lem:spinless},
\SourceLabel{sec:matching}]{CheungVIIIST}
is consistent with this fixed-worldsheet geometry.
It is not a choice of an independent scalar flux.

\subsection{Independent Aharonov--Bohm holonomy}

A charged complex scalar coupled to an independently
specified flat connection has the holonomy
\(e^{2\pi\ii\beta}\) in \eqref{eq:twist}.
The number \(\beta\) is an input. Neither the scalar
nature of the field nor the geometric deficit supplies
it. The resulting Green operators are exactly those
already constructed.

\subsection{Integer-spin components induced by the geometry}

For an integer spin-weight component, the flat
Levi-Civita connection can induce a nontrivial
equivariance in a developing parallel frame.
To fix the convention without ambiguity, consider
covariant transverse tensors and define their
\(+s\) component by contraction with
\((e_X+\ii e_Y)^{\otimes s}\).
Since
\[
 e_X+\ii e_Y
 =e^{\ii\alpha\varphi}(e_r+\ii e_{\hat\varphi}),
\]
a single-valued polar component gives
\[
 A_{+s}(\varphi+2\pi)
 =e^{2\pi\ii s\alpha}A_{+s}(\varphi)
 =e^{-\ii s\mu}A_{+s}(\varphi).
\]
Thus
\begin{equation}
 \beta_{+s}\equiv-\frac{s\mu}{2\pi}\pmod1,
 \qquad
 \beta_{-s}\equiv+\frac{s\mu}{2\pi}\pmod1.
 \label{eq:helicity}
\end{equation}
Opposite component conventions interchange the signs.
For the rough tensor equation
\[
 -\nabla^a\nabla_a A+m^2A=F,
\]
each parallel spin-weight component obeys the scalar
equation. General tensor bundles may contain several
spin weights; \(\pm s\) denote the specified pure
helicity sectors, not an undeclared decomposition of
every tensor into only two components.

\begin{proposition}[Geometrically twisted transverse vectors]
\label{prop:Jtwist}
With the componentwise twisted Friedrichs extension,
Theorems~\ref{thm:green}, \ref{thm:speed}, and
\ref{thm:closed} apply to each sector
\eqref{eq:helicity}.
For transverse vectors, \(\beta_{+1}=\alpha\). In that
sector:
\[
 \nu_0=1,\qquad
 \nu_{-1}=\frac{1-\alpha}{\alpha}
         =\frac{\mu}{2\pi\alpha}.
\]
The latter mode is deficient exactly when \(\mu<\pi\).
The opposite transverse helicity has the same criterion.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
The operator is the scalar flat-connection operator in
each parallel component. The deficiency statements are
Lemma~\ref{lem:deficiency} with \(\beta=\alpha\) and
with the opposite character.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}[The full vector problem is larger]
The \(t\)- and \(z\)-components of a rough vector field
are untwisted scalars. Each has a logarithmic deficient
mode for every \(0<\mu<2\pi\).
Accordingly, the criterion \(\mu<\pi\) concerns the
\emph{transverse helicity sectors}, not essential
self-adjointness of the full unconstrained vector
problem.

No Maxwell constraint, Proca constraint, compatible
apex gauge domain, or spinor Green operator is supplied.
Spinors additionally require a spin structure.
The spinless matching statement of VIII-ST does not
choose one. XI-B's flat de Donder gauge fixing is not a
substitute for these missing conical domain conditions
\cite{CheungVIIIST,CheungXIB}.
\end{remark}

\subsection{Slicing holonomy is a separate object}

VII-F-ST's \SourceLabel{thm:holonomy} concerns an affine
word on a particle-supported cellulation
\cite{CheungVIIFST}. Its event and combinatorial data
are not used in any kernel or deficiency calculation
here. In particular:
\[
 \text{geometric cone holonomy}
 \neq
 \text{independent scalar AB input}
 \neq
 \text{slicing certificate}.
\]
These are scope distinctions, not premises of a proof.
No slicing cell count or finite event is imported into
the continuum Green operator.

%======================================================================
\section{Supported replacement of flat-completion operators}
\label{sec:transfer}
%======================================================================

\subsection{The geometric arrival window}

\begin{definition}[Angularly small chart]
\label{def:chart}
An angularly small developing chart is an open
\(U\subset M\) contained in
\[
 \{r>r_U,\ \varphi\in I\},
 \qquad r_U>0,\qquad |I|<\pi,
\]
with a fixed angular lift on \(I\), and equipped with
the developing map of Section~\ref{sec:host}.
For its spatial points,
\[
 |\alpha(\varphi-\varphi')|<\pi\alpha,
 \qquad
 |\mathrm{dev}_{\mathrm{sp}}x-
   \mathrm{dev}_{\mathrm{sp}}x'|=R_0=d(x,x').
\]
The bundle is trivialised by a local parallel frame.
\end{definition}

For spatial pairs in such a chart, define
\begin{equation}
 T_{\mathrm{arr}}(x,x')
 =\min\left(
   \{\rho_0\}\cup
   \{R_k:\ k\neq0,\
        |\psi-2\pi\alpha k|\leq\pi\}
       \right).
 \label{eq:Tarr}
\end{equation}
Including the equality case does not change the
threshold: such a term has \(R_k=\rho_0\).
This definition records all possible additional
geometric arrivals, whether or not their total
coefficient later cancels.

\begin{lemma}[Uniform lower bound]
\label{lem:window}
In an angularly small chart,
\begin{equation}
 T_{\mathrm{arr}}(x,x')
 \geq L_U:=2r_U\sin\left(\frac{\pi\alpha}{2}\right)>0.
 \label{eq:uniform-window}
\end{equation}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
For \(k\neq0\) in \eqref{eq:Tarr},
\[
 \pi\alpha\leq|\psi-2\pi\alpha k|\leq\pi.
\]
Consequently,
\[
 R_k^2
 =(r-r')^2+
 4rr'\sin^2\left(\frac{\psi-2\pi\alpha k}{2}\right)
 +\Delta z^2
 \geq4r_U^2\sin^2(\pi\alpha/2).
\]
Also \(\rho_0\geq r+r'>2r_U\).
\end{proof}

\begin{theorem}[Scalar kernel replacement]
\label{thm:transfer}
Let \(B=A_{F,\beta}+m^2\), let \(U\) be angularly small,
let \(f\in C_c^\infty(U;L_\beta)\), and let
\(\mathcal O\subset U\) be open.
Transport \(f\) in the local parallel frame to the
completion and extend it by zero.
For \(\sigma\in\{+1,-1\}\), assume
\begin{equation}
 \sigma(t-t')<T_{\mathrm{arr}}(x,x')
 \quad\text{for every }(t,x)\in\mathcal O,\
                  (t',x')\in\supp f.
 \label{eq:directional-window}
\end{equation}
Then
\begin{equation}
 (G_\sigma^Bf)|_{\mathcal O}
 =
 \left(G_\sigma^{\mathrm{flat}}\,
             \mathrm{dev}_*f\right)\circ\mathrm{dev}
             \big|_{\mathcal O}.
 \label{eq:transfer}
\end{equation}
For \(E_B\), it suffices to assume
\[
 |t-t'|<T_{\mathrm{arr}}(x,x').
\]
A sufficient common condition for both signs and for
\(E_B\) is that the time extent of
\(\mathcal O\cup\supp f\) be less than \(L_U\).
The same replacement holds for the \(\mathsf E_0\)
extension of Proposition~\ref{prop:E0}.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
In the parallel chart frame the direct \(k=0\) term is
the ordinary flat kernel with unit weight.
Every other retarded geometric term is supported at or
after \(T_{\mathrm{arr}}\), and the retarded
diffracted term is supported at or after \(\rho_0\).
The global distribution prescription in
Theorem~\ref{thm:closed} preserves these support
statements at image boundaries. Hence the difference
kernel vanishes on the open pair region in
\eqref{eq:directional-window} for \(\sigma=+1\).
Time reflection proves the advanced statement with
\(\sigma=-1\). Integration against \(f\) gives
\eqref{eq:transfer}.

The absolute-time condition handles both signs.
Lemma~\ref{lem:window} gives the uniform sufficient
condition. The \(\mathsf E_0\) correction begins at
\(\rho_0\), so it also vanishes in the same window.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}[A sufficient window, not a universal converse]
The arrival bound is deliberately conservative.
Compatible orbifold characters, angular cancellations,
or a particular source can eliminate a prospective
additional signal. Therefore one cannot assert that
every source differs from its flat response immediately
outside the window.

If an additional contribution is a nonzero distribution,
some compact tests detect it. An uncancelled massless
image delta, or a nonzero diffracted contribution, thus
prevents a global operator identity with the completion.
This is different from a pointwise statement for every
source.
\end{remark}

\subsection{The independent retained-shadow condition}
\label{subsec:shadow}

Theorem~\ref{thm:transfer} is a kernel comparison.
A companion calculation also has its own support
contract. Write the developed slab as
\[
 \widehat M_{T_{\mathrm{lab}}}
 =[0,T_{\mathrm{lab}}]\times\RR^3.
\]
For a retained observation region \(\mathcal O\), the
X-B-ST contract uses
\begin{equation}
 D_*=
 J_\eta^-(\overline{\mathcal O})
       \cap\widehat M_{T_{\mathrm{lab}}}
 \Subset\mathrm{dev}(U).
 \label{eq:shadow}
\end{equation}
Tests belong to \(\mathcal O\); the required coordinate,
interaction, and propagation calculations belong to the
retained shadow, or to a specified compact
neighbourhood of it
\cite[\SourceLabel{def:supported},
\SourceLabel{ass:host}]{CheungXBST}.

The IX-A-ST presentation instead makes the reserve
explicit:
\[
 V=(0,T_{\mathrm{lab}})\times B_{r_0},\qquad
 K_*=[0,T_{\mathrm{lab}}]\times
                  \overline B_{r_0+T_{\mathrm{lab}}},
\]
inside a developed region containing
\[
 (-\delta,H)\times B_R,\qquad
 R>r_0+T_{\mathrm{lab}},\quad H>T_{\mathrm{lab}}.
 \tag{\(\ast\)}
\]
Its closure used in the calculation must stay off
\(\WW\)
\cite[\SourceLabel{def:support}]{CheungIXAST}.
Here \(r_0,R\) are Euclidean laboratory radii around its
developed centre; they are not the polar radius \(r\)
from the apex.

\begin{assumption}[Conjunctive supported-transfer contract]
\label{ass:transfer-contract}
A companion calculation is transferred only if:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(T\arabic*)}]
\item all retained data lie in an angularly small chart,
with the signature and parallel-frame conventions fixed;
\item its full retained shadow, initial-data region, and
all intermediate compact source supports lie in a
declared compact regular reserve inside that chart;
\item each Green operation satisfies the appropriate
signed pair window \eqref{eq:directional-window}, on
a neighbourhood of the compact pair supports needed
for its seminorm estimates.
\end{enumerate}
For the ball presentation \((\ast)\), a simple sufficient
choice is
\begin{equation}
 T_{\mathrm{lab}}
 <\min\{R-r_0,L_U\},
 \label{eq:conjunctive-bound}
\end{equation}
together with the stated time and regularity reserves.
If a calculation uses a larger buffered time interval,
its actual time extent replaces \(T_{\mathrm{lab}}\)
in the arrival bound.
\end{assumption}

The two inequalities in \eqref{eq:conjunctive-bound}
have different functions. The first keeps the required
flat causal calculation inside the laboratory. The
second excludes intrinsic additional arrivals.
Neither implies the other.

\begin{corollary}[Replacement in finite supported expressions]
\label{cor:expressions}
Assume Assumption~\ref{ass:transfer-contract}.
A finite scalar expression built from compact smooth
sources, smooth local differential operators, and the
retained retarded or advanced scalar Green operations
has the same retained test actions after replacing
every flat scalar Green operation by its intrinsic
Friedrichs counterpart. The assertion holds in
fixed-support smooth seminorms when the window holds
on the corresponding neighbourhoods.

Smooth supported Cauchy evolution is also replaced:
the relevant propagators are \(W_B(t)\) and
\(\dot W_B(t)\), compared with their flat counterparts
under the same initial-to-observation window.
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
Apply Theorem~\ref{thm:transfer} to the innermost Green
operation. Kernel equality on an open pair region
persists under finite differentiation. Smooth
differential operators with the declared compact
coefficient supports produce the same next compact
source. Induction proves the statement for the finite
expression, with the retained-shadow hypothesis ensuring
that no undeclared intermediate value is used.

For fixed-support seminorms, equality on the stipulated
neighbourhoods gives equality of all derivatives used
in the estimate. For Cauchy evolution, differentiate
the positive-time equality for \(W_B\), and use its
common Cauchy normalization at zero. The data are
smooth and compactly supported away from the apex, so
these differentiations are legitimate.
\end{proof}

This corollary concerns scalar test actions and
classical supported evolution. It does not identify
global equation quotients, quantum algebras, or
products. In particular,
Remark~\ref{rem:compact-exact} is not bypassed.

\subsection{Exact companion targets and their stops}

The following ledger records permitted
\emph{operator replacement}, not a new proof of each
cited companion theorem. For the original real scalar
contracts take \(\beta=0\). A twisted charged scalar
requires its corresponding complex-bundle formulation.

\begingroup
\small
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.13}
\begin{longtable}{@{}L{.17\linewidth}L{.37\linewidth}L{.40\linewidth}@{}}
\toprule
Source and label & Retained scalar content replaced & Stop\\
\midrule
\endfirsthead
\toprule
Source and label & Retained scalar content replaced & Stop\\
\midrule
\endhead
\bottomrule
\endfoot

X-B-ST,
\SourceLabel{thm:retarded}
\cite{CheungXBST}
&
The linear retarded-response test, its support,
normalization, and continuity, with the same local
coefficient operator and Hessian sign.
&
No transfer of \SourceLabel{thm:hbar}, positive-\(\hbar\)
claims, a quantum product extension, or a global
equation-quotient identification.
\\

X-C-ST,
\SourceLabel{thm:maps},
\SourceLabel{cor:support}
\cite{CheungXCST}
&
The stated scalar response coefficients and finite
iterations on actual smooth compact intermediate
tests, provided every Green operation remains in
the retained shadow and window.
&
No second-order claim outside \(D_*\), and no
construction of a general \(T_2\) or retarded-product
hierarchy.
\\

X-D-ST,
\SourceLabel{prop:propagation},
\SourceLabel{thm:convergence}
\cite{CheungXDST}
&
Fixed-support \(O(\epsilon)\) propagation and
sharp-width convergence of representative scalar
tests on the retained interval, with uniform
support and window reserves.
&
No use of global Huygens propagation or absence of
late signals. No sharp-metric admission follows.
The corresponding global free-field quotient is
not identified by this paper.
\\

V-B,
\SourceLabel{thm:raw}
\cite{CheungVB}
&
The bulk retarded scalar-wave contribution to the
raw current, when its component calculation is
within the contract.
&
The initial-surface term \(\delta(t)j_\Sigma\)
requires its own trace and distributional check.
Additional image fronts are not removed.
\\

IX-A-ST,
\SourceLabel{def:support},
free evolution
\cite{CheungIXAST}
&
The retained smooth scalar Cauchy evolution inside
\(K_*\), with its strict lateral margin.
&
Boundary-sensitive admission is not a conical
Hadamard-state construction.
\\

IX-B-ST and IX-C-ST,
free scalar parts
\cite{CheungIXBST,CheungIXCST}
&
Only scalar Green operations satisfying the
declared supported contract.
&
The triangle calibration, partial products,
presentation relations, and quantum closure are
not consequences of this replacement.
\\

III-B,
\SourceLabel{thm:Cauchy}
\cite{CheungIIIB}
&
The supported laboratory scalar solution through
the replaced evolution and its declared data.
&
Not a global conical Cauchy-surface theorem and
not an enlargement of its relational domain.
\\
\end{longtable}
\endgroup

\paragraph{IX-D-ST is not an additional transfer target.}
Its saturation and support bridge do not themselves
construct an intrinsic conical Green operator
\cite{CheungIXDST}. This paper's
Theorem~\ref{thm:transfer} is a different statement with
additional extension and arrival hypotheses.
No IX-D-ST product or causal interface is promoted by
calling a retained shadow saturated.

\paragraph{Which flat blocks are being replaced.}
XI-B constructs scalar wave inverses on a Minkowski
slab and a graviton inverse
\[
 G_{\mathrm{gr}}^\pm=-\mathcal P\,G_0^{\mathrm{flat},\pm},
\]
where \(\mathcal P\) is trace reversal
\cite[\SourceLabel{lem:Green},
\SourceLabel{thm:graviton}]{CheungXIB}.
X-G-ST's auxiliary--ghost Green matrix likewise belongs
to its declared completion
\cite[\SourceLabel{ass:host}]{CheungXGST}.
The present theorem replaces the scalar equation block
only. It does not establish conical graviton, ghost,
auxiliary, BRST, or gauge-constraint blocks, nor does
it make XI-B's full algebra intrinsic on the cone.

%======================================================================
\section{A finite Enter catalogue of supplied evaluations}
\label{sec:catalogue}
%======================================================================

This section is analytically independent of the
existence proofs. It supplies a finite reporting
interface of the I-B/En09-A type
\cite{CheungIB,CheungEn09}, not a physical acquisition
map for a Green distribution.

\subsection{What can be entered in the catalogue}

A wave kernel is generally a distribution. Even at a
generic spatial pair it contains delta fronts in time.
A purported ``kernel value'' on such a front is not a
number. We therefore use smeared entries, or values
restricted to a declared smooth part of a kernel.

Choose compact smooth sections \(a,f\) whose pair
supports satisfy the transfer contract, and define
\[
 Q_{\mathrm{cone}}=\pair{a}{G_+^Ff},
 \qquad
 Q_{\mathrm{flat}}
 =\pair{\mathrm{dev}_*a}
       {G_+^{\mathrm{flat}}\mathrm{dev}_*f}.
\]
These are finite complex numbers, and
Theorem~\ref{thm:transfer} proves their equality.
Choose also one fixed generic spatial pair and define
\[
 C_{\mathrm{dif}}(x,x')
 =-\frac{\Phi_\beta(0,\vartheta)}
          {4\pi^2\alpha\sqrt{rr'}},
 \qquad
 \kappa_L=\frac{2e^{-\gamma_E}}{L}.
\]

A possible finite catalogue is:
\begin{center}
\small
\begin{tabular}{@{}L{.18\linewidth}L{.47\linewidth}L{.27\linewidth}@{}}
\toprule
Entry & Mathematical target & Required scope metadata\\
\midrule
C1 & \(Q_{\mathrm{cone}}\) &
\(\alpha,\beta,m,B,a,f\), frame, support window\\
C2 & \(Q_{\mathrm{flat}}\) &
Same tests and normalization as C1\\
C3 & \(C_{\mathrm{dif}}(x,x')\) &
Generic pair, angular lift, front convention\\
C4 & \(\kappa_L\), and optionally \(m^2-\kappa_L^2\) &
Boundary scale \(L\), units, mass\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
For a complex entry, its real and imaginary parts are
reported separately.

A report word contains a finite rational approximation
or enclosure, its error convention, and a status:
for example \texttt{ANALYTIC}, \texttt{SUPPLIED\_NUMERIC},
or \texttt{UNCERTIFIED}.
The existence of an enclosure is not inferred merely
by printing a decimal. An installed symbolic formula is
also a finite description, not an exact finite-bit
encoding of an arbitrary real number.

The number \(\kappa_L\) is the magnitude of a transverse
negative-energy scale. It is a positivity certificate
for the \emph{mass-shifted} operator only when accompanied
by the comparison \(m\geq\kappa_L\).

\subsection{Complete destructive reporting}

\begin{theorem}[Finite supplied-report instrument]
\label{thm:instrument}
Let \(C\cong\CC^D\), \(D=2^q\geq2\), have a calibrated
orthonormal basis \(\{\ket{\tau_j}\}\).
Let \(A\) contain every surviving finite register.
Install finite report words \(w_j\), with explicit unused
and failure labels, and put
\[
 D_j=\bra{\tau_j}_C\otimes I_A.
\]
Then
\begin{equation}
 \mathcal M(X)
 =\sum_j\proj{j,w_j}_R\otimes D_jXD_j^\dagger
 \label{eq:instrument}
\end{equation}
is completely positive and trace preserving and obeys
\[
 \Tr_R\mathcal M(X)=\Tr_CX.
\]
These identities hold with every untouched finite
reference. The quantum output contains \(A\), not \(C\).
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
The recorded Kraus maps are
\(L_j=\ket{j,w_j}_R\otimes D_j\), and
\[
 \sum_jL_j^\dagger L_j
 =\sum_j\proj{\tau_j}\otimes I_A=I_{CA}.
\]
Expanding
\[
 X=\sum_{j,k}\ket{\tau_j}\bra{\tau_k}\otimes X_{jk}
\]
shows that the \(j\)-th output block is \(X_{jj}\).
Summing those blocks gives the partial trace.
Tensoring the calculation with a reference identity
proves the complete statements.
\end{proof}

This is the finite instrument of I-B
\cite[\SourceLabel{thm:instrument}]{CheungIB},
used in X-B-ST and compared with En09-A
\cite{CheungXBST,CheungEn09}. It reports installed
data; it does not calculate an unknown kernel by
destructive readout. A finite-register input state in
this theorem is not a state of the continuum field.

\begin{proposition}[Calibration and recovery limits]
\label{prop:clock-limits}
For the instrument \eqref{eq:instrument}:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item Distinct labels \(t_j\) required to equal one fixed
reading-event time on every positive-probability branch
permit at most one occurring label.
\item There is no channel left inverse on the full
clock--survivor input space.
\item The classical record marginal does not determine
the surviving quantum state.
\item No finite clock matrices satisfy
\([T_C,H_C]=\ii\hbar I_C\) with \(\hbar\neq0\).
\end{enumerate}
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Distinctness proves the first assertion.
For the second, the two clock states
\[
 \frac{\ket{\tau_0}+\ket{\tau_1}}{\sqrt2},
 \qquad
 \frac{\ket{\tau_0}-\ket{\tau_1}}{\sqrt2}
\]
with the same surviving preparation have identical
destructive outputs. A left inverse cannot recover
both. Inputs
\(\proj{\tau_0}\otimes\rho_A\) and
\(\proj{\tau_0}\otimes\widetilde\rho_A\) give the same
deterministic record but different residuals when the
two states differ. Finally, the trace of a commutator
is zero, whereas \(\Tr(\ii\hbar I_C)=\ii\hbar D\neq0\).
\end{proof}

These are the fixed-event, no-return,
record--residual, and finite-CCR limitations recorded
in I-B
\cite[\SourceLabel{prop:fixed-event},
\SourceLabel{prop:no-return},
\SourceLabel{prop:record-residual},
\SourceLabel{prop:no-ccr}]{CheungIB}
and in En09-A \cite{CheungEn09}.
They concern the finite interface, not consumption of
the geometric time coordinate.

\subsection{A fixed-interface table bound}

To state a meaningful small approximation bound, the
complete output interface must be fixed. Different
deterministic decimal strings in orthogonal classical
records are perfectly distinguishable; small numerical
difference between their printed values does not make
those channels close.

For comparison, suppose a bounded real target has been
converted to a Bernoulli parameter \(p_j\in[0,1]\).
Let \(\Lambda_p\) first perform the clock dephasing,
retain the code and residual, and append a binary
report with probability \(p_j\) on code \(j\).

\begin{proposition}[Complete fixed-table distance]
\label{prop:table}
For two Bernoulli tables \(p,q\) on the same complete
interface,
\begin{equation}
 \frac12\norm{\Lambda_p-\Lambda_q}_\diamond
 =\max_j|p_j-q_j|.
 \label{eq:diamond}
\end{equation}
Thus certified rational approximations of the
parameters give exactly the corresponding fixed-table
channel bound.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
After adjoining an arbitrary reference and dephasing the
clock, the \(j\)-block of an input operator is \(X_{jj}\).
The two binary output blocks of the difference are
\((p_j-q_j)X_{jj}\) and its negative. Hence their total
trace norm is bounded by
\[
 2\max_j|p_j-q_j|\sum_j\norm{X_{jj}}_1.
\]
Pinching the clock is an average of unitary
conjugations, so
\(\sum_j\norm{X_{jj}}_1\leq\norm X_1\).
This proves the upper bound, including every reference.
A basis-clock input at an index attaining the maximum
gives the lower bound.
\end{proof}

This is the type of rational-table comparison used in
X-A-ST \cite[\SourceLabel{prop:table}]{CheungXAST}.
It bounds a finite report channel, not a Green operator
in a continuum norm. Any physical transport
interpretation additionally needs compatible complete
channels, causal locations, durations, storage, and
error allowances of the kind stated in Oai283-A
\cite{CheungOai283A}. It is not furnished by
\eqref{eq:diamond} alone.

\subsection{Finite tests do not establish continuum coverage}

\begin{proposition}[Coverage and an explicit finite-test limitation]
\label{prop:coverage}
Let \(\mathscr V\) be an independently specified
finite-dimensional space containing all residuals
admissible for a particular claim. If a finite
evaluation map
\[
 \mathcal Q|_{\mathscr V}:\mathscr V\longrightarrow\CC^s
\]
is injective, then \(\mathcal Q(R)=0\) implies \(R=0\)
within that declared class.

Without a coverage hypothesis, finite tests do not in
general establish a distributional identity. In
particular, any finite family of compact linear
evaluations of smooth symmetric tensors can miss a
nonzero compactly supported conserved perturbation
in a regular developed region.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
The first assertion is injectivity.

For the second, work in a relatively compact regular
Minkowski chart and, for \(h\in C_c^\infty\) there, put
\[
 S_{\mu\nu}[h]
 =(\partial_\mu\partial_\nu-\eta_{\mu\nu}\Box_\eta)h.
\]
This tensor is symmetric and conserved. Every one of
the finitely many evaluations is a linear functional of
\(h\). Their common kernel in the infinite-dimensional
space of such \(h\) contains a nonzero element.
Its trace is
\[
 \eta^{\mu\nu}S_{\mu\nu}[h]=-3\Box_\eta h.
\]
A compactly supported smooth solution of
\(\Box_\eta h=0\) has zero Cauchy data before its time
support and is zero. Hence the chosen nonzero \(h\)
has nonzero trace, and \(S[h]\neq0\).
Extension by zero preserves smoothness because its
support lies strictly inside the regular chart.
\end{proof}

The coverage condition and conserved-perturbation
example are the finite-test distinction made in
Oai282-A
\cite[\SourceLabel{prop:coverage},
\SourceLabel{prop:invisible}]{CheungOai282A}.
The example is not asserted to be a difference of two
Green kernels satisfying the same extension condition.
It illustrates why a finite comparison, by itself,
does not prove a continuum identity.

%======================================================================
\section{Integrity of numerical comparisons}
\label{sec:numerics}
%======================================================================

The existence, support, and kernel identities above are
analytical statements. Their proofs do not use the
numerical discrepancies reported in the supplied draft.

The supplied draft refers to scripts and logs that are
not contained in this single-file source. Accordingly:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(N\arabic*)}]
\item the inherited discrepancies are retained as
\emph{reported numerical data}, not as newly verified
error bounds;
\item no execution, independent rebuild, interval
certification, or code availability is asserted;
\item a submission using those values as reproducible
computational evidence should provide the scripts,
versions, truncations, precision settings, raw values,
and residuals;
\item no reported finite agreement is used as a proof
of causal support or distributional equality.
\end{enumerate}
This values-plus-residual discipline is consistent with
the integrity-aware reporting of XVI-O1-ST
\cite{CheungXVIOOneST}. Its unrelated algebraic or
quantum statuses are not imported.

A useful record for a new comparison is
\[
 (\text{parameters},\text{mode value},\text{closed value},
   \text{absolute residual},\text{relative residual},
   \text{precision},\text{cutoffs},\text{tail bounds},
   \text{status}).
\]
When the denominator is zero or unreliable, a relative
residual should be marked inapplicable.
Appendix~\ref{app:numerics} preserves the principal
supplied numbers, including the high-frequency
cancellation failure. Theorem~\ref{thm:speed}, not
that table, proves support.

%======================================================================
\section{Status, exclusions, and remaining problems}
\label{sec:status}
%======================================================================

\subsection{Extension status}

\begingroup
\small
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.12}
\begin{longtable}{@{}L{.25\linewidth}L{.22\linewidth}L{.20\linewidth}L{.25\linewidth}@{}}
\toprule
Restricted extension & Nonnegativity of \(B\) &
Kernel representation & Spatial propagation\\
\midrule
\endfirsthead
\toprule
Restricted extension & Nonnegativity of \(B\) &
Kernel representation & Spatial propagation\\
\midrule
\endhead
\bottomrule
\endfoot

Friedrichs, any \(\beta\)
&
Always
&
Theorem~\ref{thm:closed}
&
Theorem~\ref{thm:speed}
\\

\(\mathsf L_L\), \(\nu=0\)
&
Exactly when \(m\geq\kappa_L\)
&
Temporal inverses exist; closed conical wave formula
not derived here
&
Open here
\\

\(\mathsf E_0\), \(0<\nu<1\)
&
Always
&
Proposition~\ref{prop:E0}
&
Finite speed from its correction support
\\

\(\mathsf E_\lambda\), \(0<\lambda<\infty\)
&
Always
&
Temporal inverses exist; closed conical wave formula
not derived here
&
Open here
\\

\(\mathsf E_\lambda\), \(\lambda<0\)
&
Exactly when the mass dominates every transverse
\(\kappa_j\)
&
Temporal inverses exist; closed conical wave formula
not derived here
&
Open here
\\

Non-diagonal transverse \(U(2)\), when \(d_\beta=2\)
&
Not analysed here
&
Outside the rotation-diagonal restriction
&
Not analysed here
\\

\(k_z\)-dependent, non-product, or longitudinally
nonlocal conditions
&
Not analysed here
&
Outside Assumption~\ref{ass:product}
&
Not analysed here
\\
\end{longtable}
\endgroup

\subsection{Remaining analytical questions}

The following remain unresolved in this paper.
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textbf{O\arabic*.}]
\item Whether
\[
 P_mC_c^\infty(M)=\ker E_B\cap C_c^\infty(M)
\]
for the extensions under consideration.
\item Closed conical wave formulas and spatial finite
propagation for the logarithmic family and the
general finite nonzero \(\lambda\) family.
\item The non-diagonal transverse \(U(2)\) family and
the wider translation-invariant non-product ledger.
\item Pointwise image-boundary prescriptions beyond
the global distribution identity proved here.
\item Spin structures and spinor domains; compatible
Maxwell and Proca constraints at the apex.
\item Uniform \(\mu\to0\) limits through moving image
boundaries and wave fronts.
\item Conical states, Hadamard covariances,
quantisation, and interacting or time-ordered
products.
\end{enumerate}
The ordinary pointwise flat limit away from the moving
boundaries is discussed in Appendix~\ref{app:flat};
it does not settle O6.

\subsection{Standing non-identifications}

\begin{itemize}
\item The cone and its extension condition remain
prescribed inputs. Symmetry, conservation, and zero
trace do not impose Einstein's equation. For example,
in a regular flat chart \(t_{\mu\nu}=k_\mu k_\nu\),
with \(k\neq0\) constant and null, is conserved,
symmetric, and traceless, but the local Einstein
tensor vanishes while \(t_{\mu\nu}\neq0\).
This is the separation recorded in I-B and X-A-ST
\cite[\SourceLabel{prop:not-source}]{CheungIB}
\cite[\SourceLabel{prop:noeinstein}]{CheungXAST}.

\item A Green inverse is not a time-ordered product.
The convolution prescription of X-A-conv-ST is not
repaired or unfrozen by this paper
\cite{CheungXAConvST}.

\item XI-E's named flat-background Hadamard algebra
is not a state or Hadamard construction on this
cone \cite{CheungXIE}. O7 remains unresolved here.

\item The instantaneous spatial kernel named in
Em02-E is not identified with this retarded wave
kernel, and no cosmological lapse is constructed
\cite{CheungEm02E}. This is an exclusion of an
identification, not an imported theorem about
Em02-E.

\item I-B's finite transport theorem is a finite
register operation on a declared route, not the
continuum operator \(G_\pm\)
\cite[\SourceLabel{thm:transport}]{CheungIB}.
Likewise, a complete finite-interface simulation
bound is not a continuum kernel estimate.

\item No conical graviton, ghost, auxiliary, Maxwell,
Proca, or spinor system follows from replacing a
scalar wave block.

\item The companion charts' Ward, covariance,
admission, residual, and product ledgers are
unchanged. A documentary separation, source
relationship, or shared vocabulary is not a
proof-transfer hypothesis.

\item XVI-N is not discharged, XVI-O is not updated,
and XV-B is not opened by this paper
\cite{CheungXVIN,CheungXVIO,CheungXVB}.
The scoped O.1 status remains \NOTCLOSED{} where
it was not closed; \bsr{} is not promoted to true.
No inherited characteristic or radiative quantum
coefficient is admitted.

\item No OpenAI-family identifier, finite evaluation
family, or transport catalogue is identified with
a cone, holonomy, Green distribution, or quantum
field.
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Conclusion.}
The intrinsic scalar Green operator is constructed
after an extension has been supplied. Friedrichs gives
intrinsic causal support and an explicit diffraction
formula. Agreement with a flat-completion laboratory
requires both a retained-support certificate and an
arrival window. Finite Enter reporting can preserve
supplied values and residuals but neither supplies
those analytical hypotheses nor closes the remaining
extension, state, gauge, or product problems.

%======================================================================
\appendix
\section{Pointwise flat limits and normalization checks}
\label{app:flat}
%======================================================================

\subsection{A restricted flat limit}

For the untwisted Friedrichs kernel, fix regular spatial
points and a lifted angle that stays a positive
distance from \(\pm\pi\) as \(\alpha\uparrow1\).
For \(\alpha\) sufficiently close to one, only \(k=0\)
belongs to \(\mathcal K\).
Equation~\eqref{eq:Carslaw} gives
\[
 D_1(u,\vartheta)=0.
\]
On angular sets bounded away from the image boundaries,
differentiation of the closed denominators gives, for
\(\alpha\) near one, a bound of the form
\[
 |\Phi_0(u,\vartheta)|
 \leq C(1-\alpha)(1+u)e^{-u/2}.
\]
Consequently dominated convergence in
\eqref{eq:master} gives the flat heat and positive
resolvent kernels at the fixed pair.

For the retarded kernel tested against a fixed compact
time test, only a bounded \(u\)-interval contributes.
The same argument applied to the joint definition in
Theorem~\ref{thm:closed} gives convergence as a time
distribution at the fixed generic pair; on smooth
kernel regions it also gives the ordinary pointwise
limit. This is not uniform through a moving image
boundary or a moving front.

\subsection{Sign and measure checks}

The scalar spectral equation is
\[
 (\partial_t^2+B)W_B(t)=0,\qquad
 W_B(0)=0,\qquad \dot W_B(0)=\id.
\]
Therefore
\[
 (\partial_t^2+B)\bigl[\theta(t)W_B(t)\bigr]
 =\delta(t)\id,
\]
and
\[
 (\partial_t^2+B)\bigl[-\theta(-t)W_B(t)\bigr]
 =\delta(t)\id.
\]
Using \(+\int_t^\infty W_B(t-s)f(s)\,\dd s\) would
instead give the negative of the required advanced
inverse.

The kernels are normalized relative to
\(\dd t\,\dd V=c\,\dd T\,\dd V\).
If one instead writes the source integral using
\(\dd T\,\dd V\), the corresponding kernel is
\[
 c\,G_\pm\bigl(c(T-T');x,x'\bigr).
\]
No additional factor is needed when the host volume
density \(c\,\dd T\,\dd V\) is used.

The transverse spectral statement
\(\spec_{\mathrm{ess}}(B_\perp)=[0,\infty)\)
must not be substituted for the full product statement
\eqref{eq:full-spectrum}. A transverse bound state
times a plane wave in \(z\) is not an \(L^2(N)\)
eigenfunction.

%======================================================================
\section{Retained numerical data from the supplied draft}
\label{app:numerics}
%======================================================================

\paragraph{Evidence status.}
Every numerical value in this appendix is copied from
the supplied draft, not newly computed or verified.
The referenced scripts and logs are not included in
this source. In particular, the printed discrepancies
are not certified upper bounds on total numerical
error. The analytical theorems do not depend on them.

\subsection{Reported heat and two-dimensional resolvent checks}

The supplied draft reports the cases
\[
 \mu=\pi/2,\quad \mu=1,\quad \mu=\pi,
\]
together with \(\beta=0.3\) at \(\mu=\pi/2\), and
\(\beta=\mu/(2\pi)\) at \(\mu=1\).
The last twist is of the geometric-helicity type up to
orientation.

For the angular heat identity
\eqref{eq:Sommerfeld}, the reported sample set is
\[
 (\zeta,\psi/(\pi\alpha))
 \in\{(0.7,0.2),(3,0.9),(8,-0.6)\},
\]
giving fifteen parameter points across the five cases.
The reported maximum absolute mode-versus-closed
discrepancy is
\[
 1.9\times10^{-22}.
\]
At \(\mu=\pi,\beta=0\), the reported diffraction
contribution is at most \(4\times10^{-33}\).
The exact vanishing in that case is
Corollary~\ref{cor:structure}, not the decimal test.

For the two-dimensional resolvent, the sample parameters
are
\[
 (s,r,r',\Delta\varphi)=(1,1,1.5,0.5),
 \qquad (2,0.8,1,2.9),
\]
with reported maximum absolute discrepancy
\[
 1.8\times10^{-23}
\]
over ten points. Raw paired values were not printed
in the supplied summary; these maxima are therefore
retained as summaries, not reconstructed logs.

The independent mode formula underlying such a check is
\[
 R_{2D,\beta}(s;x,x')
 =\frac1{2\pi\alpha}
   \sum_{n\in\ZZ}
    e^{\ii(n+\beta)(\varphi-\varphi')}
    I_{\nu_n}(sr_<)K_{\nu_n}(sr_>).
\]
For \(r\neq r'\) it is absolutely convergent.
Other pairs require the usual kernel interpretation
or a convergence prescription.

\subsection{Reported Laplace-domain wave check}

At \(r=1,r'=1.5,\Delta\varphi=2.9,\Delta z=0\), the
supplied draft compares the Laplace transform of the
massless retarded formula with a mode-built
longitudinal Fourier integral. It reports:

\begin{center}
\small
\begin{tabular}{@{}lcll@{}}
\toprule
Case & \(s\) & Reported Laplace value &
Reported relative discrepancy\\
\midrule
\(\mu=\pi/2\) & 1 &
\(5.54410642265313\times10^{-3}\) &
\(1.5\times10^{-19}\)\\
\(\mu=\pi/2\) & 3 &
\(6.28663902035412\times10^{-5}\) &
\(4.2\times10^{-19}\)\\
\(\mu=\pi/2,\beta=0.3\) & 1 &
\((2.16479458346901+1.65283850075681\ii)\times10^{-3}\) &
\(1.6\times10^{-19}\)\\
\(\mu=\pi/2,\beta=0.3\) & 3 &
\((3.34886969040763+1.77134457766163\ii)\times10^{-5}\) &
\(1.2\times10^{-18}\)\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{center}

The stated comparison integral was
\[
 \frac1\pi\int_0^{40}
      R_{2D,\beta}(\sqrt{s^2+k^2};x,x')\,\dd k.
\]
Its finite upper limit introduces a tail error.
Without a supplied tail certificate and rounding
analysis, the table is a discrepancy comparison, not
a rigorous error enclosure. Agreement at these finitely
many Laplace parameters is not an application of
Laplace-transform uniqueness to all parameters.

\subsection{Reported high-frequency consistency check}

At \(\mu=\pi/2,\beta=0\), with
\((r,r',\Delta\varphi)=(1,1.5,2.9)\), the supplied
distance is
\[
 d=R_0=2.22583034991387.
\]
For a unique shortest geometric term, the closed
resolvent formula and the \(K_0\) asymptotic give
\[
 e^{sd}\sqrt{s}\,R_{2D,0}(s)
 \longrightarrow
 \frac1{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2d}}.
\]
This exact leading constant uses the direct
\(K_0\) contribution and the strictly longer additional
arrivals. It does \emph{not} follow from causal support
alone.

The supplied draft gives the limiting value
\(0.133700810575215\) and the following eighty-digit
comparison:

\begin{center}
\small
\begin{tabular}{@{}cccc@{}}
\toprule
\(s\) &
\(e^{sd}\sqrt{s}\,R_{2D}\), modes &
\(e^{s(d+0.05)}\sqrt{s}\,R_{2D}\) &
Reported mode--closed relative discrepancy\\
\midrule
5  & 0.175771933447982 & 0.225695630087555 &
\(2.3\times10^{-64}\)\\
10 & 0.154928248627405 & 0.255433498944321 &
\(3.2\times10^{-74}\)\\
20 & 0.137892303526610 & 0.374830142960743 &
\(9.2\times10^{-67}\)\\
40 & 0.133685066614491 & 0.987806456803755 &
\(7.7\times10^{-52}\)\\
80 & 0.133607527312649 & 7.29472382177342 &
\(3.8\times10^{-7}\)\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{center}

The high-\(s\) loss is retained, not suppressed.
The supplied account attributes it to cancellation in
the mode sum and states that an earlier twenty-five-digit
run lost all digits at \(s=40\). These are reported
diagnostics. Neither the apparently successful rows nor
the failed row prove or refute
Theorem~\ref{thm:speed}.

\subsection{Reported flat-limit and front samples}

At \(\zeta=3\) and \(\psi/(\pi\alpha)=0.5\), the
supplied untwisted flat-limit samples are:

\begin{center}
\small
\begin{tabular}{@{}cccc@{}}
\toprule
\(\mu\) &
Reported \(|\mathrm{diffraction}|/S\) &
Reported \(|S-\alpha e^{\zeta\cos\psi}|/S\) &
Reported \(\max_{u\in[0,6]}|\Phi_0|\)\\
\midrule
0.1   & \(4.23448\times10^{-4}\) &
\(4.23448\times10^{-4}\) & \(5.08524\times10^{-2}\)\\
0.01  & \(4.42263\times10^{-5}\) &
\(4.42263\times10^{-5}\) & \(5.00801\times10^{-3}\)\\
0.001 & \(4.44216\times10^{-6}\) &
\(4.44216\times10^{-6}\) & \(5.00080\times10^{-4}\)\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{center}

These are compatible with the restricted limit in
Appendix~\ref{app:flat}; they do not establish uniform
coverage near a boundary.

For the massless diffracted front at
\[
 \mu=\pi/2,\qquad
 (r,r',\Delta\varphi,\Delta z)=(1,1.5,1,0.3),
\]
the supplied values of
\(\sqrt{t^2-\rho_0^2}\,G_+^{\mathrm{dif}}\), at
\(t-\rho_0=10^{-2},10^{-4},10^{-6}\), are respectively
\[
 0.0216738,\qquad 0.0229430,\qquad 0.0229563.
\]
The supplied comparison coefficient is \(0.0229564\).
The exact coefficient is \eqref{eq:front}.

\paragraph{No finite-coverage inference.}
The finite samples test the stated implementations at
the stated inputs. They do not test every angular
boundary, every test function, every extension, or
every residual distribution.
Proposition~\ref{prop:coverage} remains the relevant
logical distinction.

%======================================================================
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{References}
%======================================================================

\bibitem{Sommerfeld1896}
A.~Sommerfeld,
Mathematische Theorie der Diffraction,
\emph{Mathematische Annalen} \textbf{47} (1896), 317--374.

\bibitem{Carslaw1899}
H.~S.~Carslaw,
Some multiform solutions of the partial differential
equations of physical mathematics and their applications,
\emph{Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society}
(1) \textbf{30} (1898--1899), 121--161.
\newblock DOI: \nolinkurl{10.1112/plms/s1-30.1.121}.
\newblock The printed contents distinguish Carslaw's
paper from Sommerfeld's following note, pp.~161--163.

\bibitem{Carslaw1920}
H.~S.~Carslaw,
Diffraction of waves by a wedge of any angle,
\emph{Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society}
(2) \textbf{18} (1920), 291--306.
\newblock DOI: \nolinkurl{10.1112/plms/s2-18.1.291}.

\bibitem{Dowker1977}
J.~S.~Dowker,
Quantum field theory on a cone,
\emph{Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General}
\textbf{10} (1977), 115--124.

\bibitem{Dowker1987}
J.~S.~Dowker,
Casimir effect around a cone,
\emph{Physical Review D} \textbf{36} (1987), 3095--3101.
\newblock DOI: \nolinkurl{10.1103/PhysRevD.36.3095}.

\bibitem{CheegerTaylor1}
J.~Cheeger and M.~Taylor,
On the diffraction of waves by conical singularities. I,
\emph{Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics}
\textbf{35} (1982), 275--331.

\bibitem{CheegerTaylor2}
J.~Cheeger and M.~Taylor,
On the diffraction of waves by conical singularities. II,
\emph{Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics}
\textbf{35} (1982), 487--529.
\newblock DOI: \nolinkurl{10.1002/cpa.3160350403}.

\bibitem{KayStuder}
B.~S.~Kay and U.~M.~Studer,
Boundary conditions for quantum mechanics on cones and
fields around cosmic strings,
\emph{Communications in Mathematical Physics}
\textbf{139} (1991), 103--139.
\newblock DOI: \nolinkurl{10.1007/BF02102731}.

\bibitem{DerezinskiRichard}
J.~Derezi\'nski and S.~Richard,
On Schr\"odinger operators with inverse square potentials
on the half-line,
\emph{Annales Henri Poincar\'e}
\textbf{18} (2017), 869--928.
\newblock DOI: \nolinkurl{10.1007/s00023-016-0520-7}.
\newblock \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.03340}.

\bibitem{BGP}
C.~B\"ar, N.~Ginoux, and F.~Pf\"affle,
\emph{Wave Equations on Lorentzian Manifolds and Quantization},
ESI Lectures in Mathematics and Physics,
European Mathematical Society, Z\"urich, 2007.
\newblock \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.1036}.

\bibitem{AharonovBohm}
Y.~Aharonov and D.~Bohm,
Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the
quantum theory,
\emph{Physical Review} \textbf{115} (1959), 485--491.
\newblock DOI: \nolinkurl{10.1103/PhysRev.115.485}.

\bibitem{Watson}
G.~N.~Watson,
\emph{A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions},
2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 1944.

\bibitem{DLMF}
F.~W.~J.~Olver, A.~B.~Olde Daalhuis, D.~W.~Lozier,
B.~I.~Schneider, R.~F.~Boisvert, C.~W.~Clark,
B.~R.~Miller, B.~V.~Saunders, H.~S.~Cohl, and
M.~A.~McClain, eds.,
\emph{NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions}.
\newblock Used: Bessel integral representations and
Bessel-transform formulas, especially
\S\S10.22 and 10.32.
\newblock \url{https://dlmf.nist.gov/}.

\bibitem{ReedSimonII}
M.~Reed and B.~Simon,
\emph{Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics II:
Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness},
Academic Press, New York, 1975.

\medskip
\noindent\textit{Enter companion manuscripts.}
The following are unpublished registered manuscript
records by N.~Cheung. Identifiers and source labels
specify the cited contracts; their inclusion does not
assert independent verification of every result in a
record. Where a full title was not supplied, the
registered identifier is used as the title.
\medskip

\bibitem{CheungIB}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{I-B-v1: A Finite Enter Spacetime:
Calibrated Destructive Time Readout on a Prescribed
Conical Product},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used: prescribed cone, local causal certificate,
geometric holonomy, finite instrument and limitations.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/I-B}.

\bibitem{CheungXAST}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{X-A-ST},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used:
\SourceLabel{ass:host},
\SourceLabel{prop:signature-ledger},
\SourceLabel{prop:table},
\SourceLabel{prop:noeinstein}.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/X-A-ST}.

\bibitem{CheungXBST}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{X-B-ST: One scalar retarded map on the X-A-ST host},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used:
\SourceLabel{ass:host},
\SourceLabel{def:supported},
\SourceLabel{thm:retarded};
the separate quantum-order boundary is not transferred.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/X-B-ST}.

\bibitem{CheungXCST}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{X-C-ST: Second-order scalar completion on the
inherited X-A-ST/X-B-ST host},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used:
\SourceLabel{ass:host},
\SourceLabel{def:moller},
\SourceLabel{thm:maps},
\SourceLabel{cor:support}.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/X-C-ST}.

\bibitem{CheungXDST}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{X-D-ST: The sharp-width limit of the completed
scalar tests},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used:
\SourceLabel{ass:host},
\SourceLabel{prop:propagation},
\SourceLabel{thm:convergence}.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/X-D-ST}.

\bibitem{CheungVB}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{V: Admissible currents, retarded response, and
finite Enter readout (local adaptation on a prescribed
conical spacetime)},
source record \SourceLabel{V-B-v1.tex},
Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used: the bulk retarded-response contract
and its separate initial-surface term.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/V-B}.

\bibitem{CheungIXAST}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{IX-A-ST: Boundary-sensitive admission of sharp
Cauchy insertions on a prescribed conical Enter spacetime},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used:
\SourceLabel{def:support}, the saturated laboratory,
and the free-evolution contract.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/IX-A-ST}.

\bibitem{CheungIXBST}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{IX-B-ST: Source-locked triangle calibration on a
prescribed conical Enter spacetime},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used: the supported scalar and
presentation-transfer boundaries.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/IX-B-ST}.

\bibitem{CheungIXCST}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{IX-C-ST: A supported partial product for one sharp
ordered word},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used: the retained scalar comparison
prescription and its distinction from a partial product.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/IX-C-ST}.

\bibitem{CheungIXDST}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{IX-D-ST},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used only for the distinction between
supported saturation and a global intrinsic
Green-operator theorem.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/IX-D-ST}.

\bibitem{CheungIIIB}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{III-B: Classical relational descent in a conical
Enter laboratory},
source record \SourceLabel{III-B-v1.tex},
Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used:
\SourceLabel{thm:Cauchy}, in its supported laboratory
scope.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/III-B}.

\bibitem{CheungVIIFST}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{VII-F-ST: A particle-supported slicing certificate
with a finite spacetime Enter interface},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used only to distinguish its
\SourceLabel{thm:holonomy} from cone holonomy.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/VII-F-ST}.

\bibitem{CheungVIIIST}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{VIII-ST: Affine matching, persistent cellulation,
and certified flow on a prescribed conical Enter spacetime},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used:
\SourceLabel{lem:spinless},
\SourceLabel{sec:matching};
no spin structure or gauge apex condition is imported.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/VIII-ST}.

\bibitem{CheungXIB}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{XI-B},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used:
\SourceLabel{lem:Green},
\SourceLabel{thm:graviton};
the flat multiplet is not transferred wholesale.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/XI-B}.

\bibitem{CheungXGST}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{X-G-ST},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used:
\SourceLabel{ass:host}; its global matrix Green
operators belong to the declared flat completion.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/X-G-ST}.

\bibitem{CheungEn09}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{En09-A},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used: the finite interface discipline and
\SourceLabel{prop:no-return}.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/En09-A}.

\bibitem{CheungOai282A}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Oai282-A},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used:
\SourceLabel{prop:coverage},
\SourceLabel{prop:invisible}; neither is a
Green-operator construction.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/Oai282-A}.

\bibitem{CheungOai283A}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Oai283-A},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used: the complete finite transport contract
and resource-accounted comparison, not a continuum
kernel estimate.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/Oai283-A}.

\bibitem{CheungXVIOOneST}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{XVI-O1-ST},
source record \SourceLabel{XVI-O1-ST-v5.tex},
version~5, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used: integrity-aware supplied-report and
residual-retention discipline only.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/XVI-O1-ST}.

\bibitem{CheungXAConvST}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{X-A-conv-ST},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Cited for its retained convolution boundary,
not as a premise selecting a Green extension.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/X-A-conv-ST}.

\bibitem{CheungXIE}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{XI-E},
version~1, Enter Calculus Companion.
\newblock Used only to distinguish its named
flat-background Hadamard algebra from a conical
state or product construction.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/XI-E}.

\bibitem{CheungEm02E}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Em02-E},
Enter Calculus Companion, series record.
\newblock Named only as an excluded identification;
no theorem from this record is used in a proof.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/Em02-E}.

\bibitem{CheungXVIN}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Landmark XVI-N},
Enter Calculus Companion, series record.
\newblock Frozen classical insertion; not discharged
by this paper.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/XVI-N}.

\bibitem{CheungXVIO}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Landmark XVI-O},
Enter Calculus Companion, series record.
\newblock Read-only status reference; no O.1 update.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/XVI-O}.

\bibitem{CheungXVB}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{XV-B},
Enter Calculus Companion, series record.
\newblock Named only as an unchanged downstream boundary.
\newblock \url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/XV-B}.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}
