\documentclass[11pt]{article}

\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm,mathtools}
\usepackage{array,booktabs,tabularx,longtable}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage{microtype}
\usepackage[hidelinks]{hyperref}

\hypersetup{
 pdftitle={VII-E-ST: Observation boundaries and finite hybrid feedback on a prescribed conical spacetime},
 pdfsubject={Local Grade S observation, residual separation, recovery obstruction, and causal transport}
}

\setlength{\emergencystretch}{3em}
\setlist{topsep=5pt,itemsep=3pt}
\allowdisplaybreaks
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{1}
\urlstyle{same}

\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\newtheorem{assumption}[theorem]{Assumption}
\theoremstyle{remark}
\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}

\newcommand{\RR}{\mathbb R}
\newcommand{\CC}{\mathbb C}
\newcommand{\HH}{\mathcal H}
\newcommand{\BB}{\mathcal B}
\newcommand{\OO}{\mathcal O}
\newcommand{\AA}{\mathcal A}
\newcommand{\XX}{\mathcal X}
\newcommand{\FF}{\mathcal F}
\newcommand{\GG}{\mathcal G}
\newcommand{\II}{\mathcal I}
\newcommand{\NN}{\mathcal N}
\newcommand{\DD}{\mathcal D}
\newcommand{\PP}{\mathcal P}
\newcommand{\MM}{\mathcal M}
\newcommand{\Mclock}{\mathcal M_C}
\newcommand{\dd}{\mathrm d}
\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\lvert #1\rangle}
\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\langle #1\rvert}
\newcommand{\kb}[2]{\ket{#1}\bra{#2}}
\newcommand{\proj}[1]{\kb{#1}{#1}}
\newcommand{\norm}[1]{\left\lVert #1\right\rVert}
\newcommand{\abs}[1]{\left\lvert #1\right\rvert}
\newcommand{\loc}[1]{\texttt{\detokenize{#1}}}
\newcommand{\doi}[1]{\href{https://doi.org/#1}{\nolinkurl{#1}}}

\DeclareMathOperator{\Tr}{Tr}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Span}{span}
\DeclareMathOperator{\supp}{supp}
\DeclareMathOperator{\im}{im}
\DeclareMathOperator{\id}{id}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Ad}{Ad}
\DeclareMathOperator{\diam}{diam}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Dec}{Dec}
\DeclareMathOperator{\diag}{diag}

\newcommand{\statementbox}[2]{%
 \par\medskip\noindent
 \fbox{\begin{minipage}{%
 \dimexpr\linewidth-2\fboxsep-2\fboxrule\relax}
 \textbf{#1}\par\smallskip #2
 \end{minipage}}
 \par\medskip
}

\title{\textbf{VII-E-ST: Observation boundaries and finite\\
hybrid feedback on a prescribed conical spacetime}\\[5pt]
\large Record compatibility, residual separation,\\
certified markings, and causal transport}
\author{Ngo Cheung}
\date{}

\begin{document}
\maketitle

\begin{abstract}
We construct a supported local spacetime adaptation of the
observation-boundary contract of VII-E and the finite hybrid-channel
contract of VII-G. The two contracts are proved independently within
one laboratory on I-B's prescribed conical Lorentzian product.
For the observation boundary, we prove the effect-pullback criterion,
its reference-stable form, the exact sharp-measurement coherence
criterion, and a qubit separation of trace distance \(1/2\) between
ideal residual targets with identical records. For hybrid evolution,
we prove a complete branch representation, history-sensitive
observation closure, spectator consistency, and the exact
recovery--constant-complement criterion. An informative classical
record consequently excludes recovery of every unknown quantum
input, even when the declared residual is also available.

The additional contribution is an end-to-end finite observation
package that keeps these distinctions visible in supplied spacetime.
We provide a compactly supported \(3+1\)-dimensional lift of a
four-face transverse adjacency exchange, an exact guarded reversible
encoding, and a separately constructed qubit instrument selecting
strictly ordered slices without changing the conical metric.
A two-step specialization has two histories with the same terminal
slice but different conditional residuals. After coarse aggregation,
the record remains unchanged while two complete residual targets
have the exact half-diamond gap
\(4(1-1/\sqrt2)/25\).
An explicit residual audit enlarges the required input observation
space from the diagonal algebra to the full qubit algebra.

A destructive finite clock, complete-channel approximation bounds,
and a causal route for both payload and classical control complete
the local Grade S construction. The package may serve as a precise
testbed for distinguishing record-level claims from instrument-level
claims in geometric feedback models. The channel and recovery
principles themselves are established finite-dimensional facts;
the claimed contribution is their supported assembly and the
explicit certificates and separations. No metric emergence,
gravitational dynamics, field instrument, radiative coefficient,
or quantum Ward identity is constructed.
\end{abstract}

\statementbox{Two contracts, one laboratory}{%
The VII-E contract concerns what a declared observation boundary can
distinguish. The VII-G contract concerns a state-independent finite
completely positive hybrid evolution. Neither contract derives the
cone, and neither is a premise supplying the other.

The four-face exchange is an illustration, not an assumption of the
general channel theorems. Matter-controlled slicing is not
matter-driven gravitational dynamics.}

\tableofcontents

%=====================================================================
\section{Introduction, provenance, and the Enter philosophy}
\label{sec:introduction}
%=====================================================================

A probability law for a classical record does not specify the
selective transformation of the surviving quantum system.
Likewise, preservation of one named expectation does not imply
recovery of every input. These distinctions are basic to the
instrument formulation of quantum measurement
\cite{DaviesLewis,Choi,Watrous}.

This paper places two source contracts in a common supported
spacetime presentation:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item VII-E's observation boundary, residual separation,
spectator condition, and four-face certificate
\cite{CheungVIIE};
\item VII-G's finite direct-sum channel, branchwise observation
criterion, recovery obstruction, and ordered-slice model
\cite{CheungVIIG}.
\end{enumerate}
Their mathematical statements are reproved below. Citation does not
replace a proof, identify two models, or provide missing geometric
dynamics.

\subsection{Enter and its spacetime interface}

In Cheung's Enter calculus, runtime quantum names are access rights
to tensor factors. Destructive computational-basis readout consumes
the measured names and returns classical records. Unmeasured factors
can remain available \cite{CheungEnter,CheungI}.
The characterization of the Born strategy in Manuscript I concerns
its explicitly specified class and five requirements. We use a
specified Born instrument and prove its channel formula; we do not
rederive that characterization or extend it to quantum fields.

The accompanying philosophy distinguishes:
\[
 \text{destructive readout},\quad
 \text{quantum-return recovery},\quad
 \text{physical implementation},\quad
 \text{geometric interpretation}.
\]
An output type does not determine the fate of all physical degrees
of freedom used by an apparatus, and a channel does not specify a
thermal machine \cite{CheungPhilosophy}.

I-B supplies a finite operational interface on a prescribed conical
spacetime \cite{CheungIB}. A finite clock can be calibrated to its
time coordinate, destructively read, and used for causal control.
The geometric time axis, defect worldsheet, and future cone remain
after that clock is consumed.

\begin{definition}[Local Grade S]
\label{def:grade}
A local Grade S observation package specifies and proves:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(S\arabic*)}]
\item a prescribed Lorentzian background and a supported regular
laboratory;
\item named observation and evolution contracts, with their
mathematical domains;
\item a complete finite destructive-clock instrument;
\item a declared finite encoding of labels and selected residual
observations;
\item reference-preserving transport with complete dependencies
embedded in the supplied causal relation.
\end{enumerate}
Grade E would additionally require a construction deriving the
geometric data from operational records. It is not claimed.
\end{definition}

\paragraph{Novelty boundary.}
Direct-sum state spaces, Kraus representations, deferred readout,
and exact quantum error correction are not new general theorems
\cite{Choi,GurevichBlass,KnillLaflamme}.
The contribution here is a supported assembly with explicit
geometric and finite-channel witnesses, including the equal-slice
residual separation proved in Section~\ref{sec:two-step}.

%=====================================================================
\section{Prescribed conical geometry and supported presentation}
\label{sec:geometry}
%=====================================================================

Fix
\[
 c>0,\qquad 0<\mu<2\pi,\qquad
 \alpha=1-\frac{\mu}{2\pi}.
\]
The physical smooth background is
\begin{equation}
 M=\RR_T\times C_\mu^\circ\times\RR_z,\qquad
 \bar g=-c^2\dd T^2+\dd r^2+\alpha^2r^2\dd\phi^2+\dd z^2,
 \label{eq:cone}
\end{equation}
where \(r>0\) and \(\phi\) is periodic with period \(2\pi\).
Its completion has the conical worldsheet
\[
 \mathcal W=\RR_T\times\{o\}\times\RR_z.
\]
No smooth Einstein tensor is assigned on \(\mathcal W\).

\begin{proposition}[Geometry and local rods]
\label{prop:geometry}
The metric has signature \((-,+,+,+)\). Choose \(\partial_T\)
as future directed. A nonzero future-causal vector
\(a\partial_T+w\) satisfies
\[
 a>0,\qquad |w|_{\rm spatial}\le ca.
\]
Static observers have proper time \(\dd\tau=\dd T\), so the
proper-time lapse is one.

On a sufficiently small lifted angular interval,
\[
 \operatorname{dev}(T,r,\phi,z)
 =\bigl(c(T-T_*),r\cos(\alpha\phi),r\sin(\alpha\phi),z\bigr)
\]
is a local isometry to Minkowski space. Its spatial coordinates
give three local rods.

In the inverse-deck convention the peripheral affine gluing is
\[
 J_\mu=\bigl(\diag(1,R(\mu),1),0\bigr).
\]
It has neither time nor axial translation.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
The signature and causal inequality follow from the diagonal
metric. Setting \(w=0\) proves the proper-time statement.
The local-isometry identity is
\[
 \dd x^2+\dd y^2=\dd r^2+\alpha^2r^2\dd\phi^2.
\]
A positive angular lift around the apex advances through
\(2\pi-\mu\); the inverse deck map closes it by rotation through
\(\mu\). Its time and axial coordinates do not change.
\end{proof}

\begin{proposition}[Failure of global hyperbolicity]
\label{prop:nonGH}
The regular product \(M\) is not globally hyperbolic.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Fix \(r_0>0\), an angle, and \(z=0\). Let \(p,q\) have that
spatial position and times \(-2r_0/c\) and \(2r_0/c\).
For \(r_n\downarrow0\), the events \((0,r_n,\phi,0)\) lie in
\(J^+(p)\cap J^-(q)\), by radial causal travel.
They have no convergent subsequence in \(M\).
Thus this causal diamond is not compact.
\end{proof}

\begin{definition}[Supported laboratory]
\label{def:presentation}
A supported presentation consists of:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item a regular developing chart and a relatively compact
laboratory region with closure disjoint from \(\mathcal W\);
\item compact spatial collars, finite marked cells, and compactly
supported tests used by the declared observations;
\item finite quantum and classical registers, their locations,
and every controller variable inspected by an operation;
\item a finite schedule with explicit input and output ports and
no undeclared incoming boundary inputs.
\end{enumerate}
Any background exterior labels are fixed metadata. No global
Cauchy theorem, Green operator, or intrinsic conical field theory
is part of this presentation.
\end{definition}

All matrix theorems below are independent of a field equation.
Developed charts, polygonal markings, and collars pull back through
the stated local isometry. They are not declarations that the
physical spacetime is global Minkowski space.

%=====================================================================
\section{Contract E: readout, records, and residuals}
\label{sec:contractE}
%=====================================================================

For a finite-dimensional Hilbert space \(H\), write
\(\BB(H)\) for its operators. A channel is a completely positive,
trace-preserving linear map. Adjoint maps use the pairing
\[
 \Tr(B\Phi(X))=\Tr(\Phi^*(B)X).
\]
We use
\[
 d_{\rm tr}(\rho,\sigma)=\frac12\norm{\rho-\sigma}_1,\qquad
 d_\diamond(\Phi,\Psi)=\frac12\norm{\Phi-\Psi}_\diamond.
\]
A classical register is jointly block diagonal in its designated
basis, including its correlations with all other registers.
A diagonal marginal alone does not establish classicality.

\subsection{Distinct interfaces}

\begin{definition}[Destructive readout]
\label{def:destructive}
Let \(S\) have computational basis \(\{\ket z\}\), with
unmeasured complement \(B\). Put
\(D_z=\bra z_S\otimes I_B\). Destructive readout is
\begin{equation}
 \MM_S(X)=\sum_z\proj z_R\otimes D_zXD_z^\dagger.
 \label{eq:destructive}
\end{equation}
Its quantum output contains \(B\), not \(S\).
The measured names are consumed.
\end{definition}

\begin{definition}[Coherent recording]
\label{def:coherent}
A fresh quantum carrier \(A\) can record the computational
basis through
\[
 V(\ket z_S\otimes\psi_B)=
                   \ket z_S\ket z_A\otimes\psi_B.
\]
The channel \(X\mapsto VXV^\dagger\) returns \(S,A,B\).
It is not destructive readout and not cloning:
\(V\ket+=\bigl(\ket{00}+\ket{11}\bigr)/\sqrt2\).
\end{definition}

\begin{definition}[Represented instrument and external labels]
\label{def:represented}
With \(P_z=\proj z_S\otimes I_B\), the represented
nondestructive sharp instrument is
\[
 X\longmapsto\sum_z\proj z_R\otimes P_zXP_z.
\]
It can be implemented using a fresh pointer and destructive
readout of that pointer. The original \(S\) is returned.

An external geometric label is classical metadata describing
a marking, chart, certificate, or location. A dictionary from
measurement outcomes to such labels is an additional input.
It is not one of the preceding quantum maps.
\end{definition}

These distinctions prevent a represented residual qubit from
being described as the return of a consumed quantum name.

\subsection{Exact record and instrument criteria}

Let \(\{P_z\}\) be a finite projective resolution of \(I_H\),
let \(q:Z\to W\) aggregate fine outcomes, and put
\[
 \Pi_w=\sum_{q(z)=w}P_z,\qquad
 \Delta_w(X)=\sum_{q(z)=w}P_zXP_z.
\]
Let \(T:\BB(H)\to\BB(K)\) be a channel and
\(\{\II_w\}_{w\in W}\) an instrument on \(K\), with
\(E_w=\II_w^*(I_K)\). Compare
\begin{align}
 \FF(X)&=\sum_w\proj w_R\otimes T(\Delta_w(X)),\nonumber\\
 \GG(X)&=\sum_w\proj w_R\otimes\II_w(T(X)).
 \label{eq:two-targets}
\end{align}
This comparison uses represented fine projections on a common
input space. For a genuinely destructive protocol, any subsequent
removal or identification of \(S\) must be included explicitly
in \(T\); it is not hidden in \(\Delta_w\).

\begin{theorem}[Effect pullback and the full residual criterion]
\label{thm:pullback}
The record marginals of \(\FF\) and \(\GG\) agree for every
input state if and only if
\begin{equation}
 T^*(E_w)=\Pi_w\qquad(w\in W).
 \label{eq:record-pullback}
\end{equation}
For an observation space \(\OO\subseteq\BB(K)\), agreement on
every observable
\(\sum_w\proj w_R\otimes B_w\), \(B_w\in\OO\), is equivalent to
\begin{equation}
 \sum_{q(z)=w}P_zT^*(B)P_z
       =T^*(\II_w^*(B))
 \qquad(w\in W,\ B\in\OO).
 \label{eq:residual-pullback}
\end{equation}
Both are equalities of linear maps on the declared observation
spaces and remain valid after tensoring with any untouched
reference identity.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
The fine aggregated probability is
\[
 \Tr T(\Delta_w(\rho))=\Tr(\rho\Pi_w),
\]
while the coarse probability is \(\Tr(\rho T^*(E_w))\).
Equality against all states is equality of Hermitian effects.

The two \(w\)-conditioned expectations of \(B\) pull back to the
two sides of \eqref{eq:residual-pullback}.
States separate Hermitian matrices, and complex linearity gives
the general equality. Tensoring an equality of linear maps with
a reference identity preserves it.
\end{proof}

The following useful error formula is record-only and unassisted:
\begin{equation}
 \sup_\rho d_{\rm TV}(p_\rho^{\GG},p_\rho^{\FF})
 =\max_{A\subseteq W}
 \norm{\sum_{w\in A}\bigl(T^*(E_w)-\Pi_w\bigr)}_\infty.
 \label{eq:event-norm}
\end{equation}
Indeed, total variation is the maximum absolute difference on
an outcome event. Interchange the finite maximum with the
state supremum and use
\(\sup_\rho|\Tr(H\rho)|=\norm H_\infty\) for Hermitian \(H\).
No equality with an assisted channel error is inferred.

\begin{theorem}[Residual obstruction and its robust form]
\label{thm:residual-obstruction}
Record compatibility does not determine a residual instrument.
There are ideal targets with identical records on every input
whose outputs have trace distance \(1/2\) on one qubit input.

If implemented versions have errors at most
\(\epsilon_{\FF},\epsilon_{\GG}\) on that input, their mutual
distance is at least
\[
 \frac12-\epsilon_{\FF}-\epsilon_{\GG}.
\]
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Take \(H=K=\CC^2\), \(T=\id\), the computational projectors,
and one coarse outcome \(*\) with \(\II_*=\id\).
Both record effects are \(I\). For
\(\rho_+=\proj+\),
\[
 \GG(\rho_+)=\proj *_R\otimes\rho_+,\qquad
 \FF(\rho_+)=\proj *_R\otimes I_2/2.
\]
Their difference has residual block
\[
 \frac12X,\qquad X=\kb01+\kb10,
\]
with eigenvalues \(1/2,-1/2\). Its trace norm is one.
The robust bound is the triangle inequality.
\end{proof}

The fine residual is realized by a pointer measurement returning
the qubit; it is not primitive destructive readout of that qubit.
Improving implementations cannot make distinct ideal target
channels equal.

\subsection{The exact sharp-measurement criterion}

Suppose now that \(\{E_w\}\) is projective and that the coarse
instrument is Lüders:
\[
 \II_w(Y)=E_wYE_w.
\]
Define the two pinching maps
\[
 \DD_\Pi(X)=\sum_w\Pi_wX\Pi_w,\qquad
 \DD_P(X)=\sum_zP_zXP_z.
\]

\begin{lemma}[Sharp-sector intertwining]
\label{lem:sharp}
Under \eqref{eq:record-pullback}, every Kraus operator \(A_\nu\)
of \(T\) satisfies
\[
 E_wA_\nu=A_\nu\Pi_w.
\]
Consequently
\[
 E_wT(X)E_v=T(\Pi_wX\Pi_v).
\]
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
For \(\psi\in\im\Pi_w\),
\[
 \sum_\nu\norm{(I-E_w)A_\nu\psi}^2
 =\langle\psi,T^*(I-E_w)\psi\rangle=0.
\]
Thus \(A_\nu\Pi_w=E_wA_\nu\Pi_w\).
For \(\psi\in\ker\Pi_w\), the same calculation with \(E_w\)
gives \(E_wA_\nu\psi=0\). Combine the two identities.
\end{proof}

\begin{theorem}[Lüders compatibility]
\label{thm:luders}
Under the sharp hypotheses and record compatibility, the
following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item \(\FF=\GG\) as complete recorded residual channels;
\item \(T\DD_\Pi=T\DD_P\);
\item
\[
 T(P_zXP_{z'})=0
\quad\text{whenever }z\ne z',\quad q(z)=q(z'),
\quad X\in\BB(H).
\]
\end{enumerate}
Thus full compatibility removes fine coherence within each
coarse outcome. It need not remove coherence between different
coarse outcomes.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
By Lemma~\ref{lem:sharp}, the \(w\)-block of \(\GG(X)\) is
\(T(\Pi_wX\Pi_w)\). Its difference from the corresponding
\(\FF\)-block consists exactly of the fine off-diagonal
corners within \(\Pi_w\).

Summing the \(w\)-blocks gives (ii). Conversely, their output
supports lie in orthogonal \(E_w\)-corners, so a zero sum makes
each corner zero. Testing a single \(P_zXP_{z'}\) proves
necessity of (iii), and expansion into corners proves
sufficiency.
\end{proof}

For injective \(q\), record compatibility already suffices.
For one coarse outcome, the criterion is \(T=T\DD_P\).
These are finite instrument identities, not field-instrument
constructions.

%=====================================================================
\section{Continuations, deferred readout, and spectator blindness}
\label{sec:continuation}
%=====================================================================

An observation space is a complex linear, adjoint-closed
subspace containing the identity. It need not be an algebra.
Write \(\rho\equiv_{\OO}\sigma\) when the two states agree
against every element of \(\OO\).

\begin{theorem}[Compositional observation boundary]
\label{thm:composition}
For a channel \(\Phi\) and observation spaces
\(\OO_{\rm in},\OO_{\rm out}\), the following are equivalent:
\[
 \rho\equiv_{\OO_{\rm in}}\sigma
 \Longrightarrow
 \Phi(\rho)\equiv_{\OO_{\rm out}}\Phi(\sigma)
 \quad\text{for all states }\rho,\sigma,
\]
and
\begin{equation}
 \Phi^*(\OO_{\rm out})\subseteq\OO_{\rm in}.
 \label{eq:adjoint-inclusion}
\end{equation}
If this inclusion holds successively, compatible continuations
preserve the declared agreement.

The reference-stable comparison of two extended inputs requires
agreement on
\(\OO_{\rm in}\otimes\BB(E)\), not merely agreement of their
unreferenced marginals.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Sufficiency follows by pulling each output observable back.
For necessity, take a Hermitian matrix \(H\) annihilating
\(\OO_{\rm in}\) under the trace pairing.
Since \(I\in\OO_{\rm in}\), \(\Tr H=0\).
For a faithful state \(\omega\), both
\(\omega+\varepsilon H\) and \(\omega-\varepsilon H\) are
states for sufficiently small \(\varepsilon>0\).
They agree on \(\OO_{\rm in}\), hence
\[
 \Tr(\Phi^*(B)H)=0
 \quad(B=B^\dagger\in\OO_{\rm out}).
\]
Finite-dimensional double orthogonal complementation gives
the inclusion. Complex linearity completes the proof.
Tensoring the inclusion proves the reference statement.
\end{proof}

\begin{theorem}[Restricted deferred readout]
\label{thm:deferred}
Let \(\{K_a\}\) be a complete Kraus family and
\(\{U_a\}\) unitaries on the surviving system. Immediate pointer
readout followed by \(U_a\), and coherent controlled \(U_a\)
followed by pointer readout, implement the same recorded
instrument:
\begin{equation}
 X\longmapsto
 \sum_a\proj a_R\otimes U_aK_aXK_a^\dagger U_a^\dagger.
 \label{eq:deferred}
\end{equation}
This identity is complete under references.

For coherent copying of an original computational register,
agreement with destructive readout holds only after both
outputs are restricted to the same record--matter interface.
A retained coherent carrier is not an additional common output.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
The isometry
\[
 W\psi=\sum_a\ket a_A\otimes K_a\psi
\]
satisfies \(W^\dagger W=I\). Controlled feedback changes it
to \(\sum_a\ket a_A\otimes U_aK_a\psi\).
Destructive readout of \(A\) gives \eqref{eq:deferred}.
The immediate implementation has the same selective maps.

For computational copying, write
\(X=\sum_{z,z'}\kb z{z'}\otimes X_{zz'}\).
After coherent copying and label-preserving controlled
operations, final readout and restriction to the common
interface retain precisely the diagonal blocks \(X_{zz}\).
If both copied measured registers are consumed, the duplicate
classical outcome can be explicitly forgotten.
No quantum return of a consumed register is involved.
\end{proof}

A continuation that reads a phase-sensitive observable of the
coherent carrier, or rewrites the controller using that carrier,
is outside this equivalence. Deferred-measurement principles
require the corresponding interface and control hypotheses
\cite{GurevichBlass}. They do not make remote control instantaneous
or preserve an implementation's storage cost automatically.

\subsection{The first spectator theorem}

For Contract E, allow a classical configuration
\[
 (g,\Gamma,\rho,\operatorname{loc},h),
\]
where \(g\) is a geometric label, \(\Gamma\) the original
accessible interface, \(h\) a controller state, and
\(\operatorname{loc}\) assigns abstract cell labels to names.
A geometric rule changes declared geometric data and location
labels. A matter rule applies a declared channel. A coupling
rule may inspect a declared state functional
\(\rho|_{\AA_v}\) and update a classical label.

Such a coupling function need not be affine. Contract E's
equal-input comparison does not by itself make it a quantum
channel.

\begin{assumption}[Complete spectator blindness]
\label{ass:blind}
Adding inaccessible spectator names does not alter:
the chosen rule or channel, exact guards, capacity checks,
certificates, successor labels, controller updates, or
transport of original names.
Spectator storage and any required spectator location history
are reserved separately. The controller does not inspect
spectator outcomes or spectator cardinality.
\end{assumption}

\begin{theorem}[Spectator consistency for Contract E]
\label{thm:spectators-E}
Under Assumption~\ref{ass:blind}, compare a finite execution
with an extension satisfying
\(\Tr_N\widetilde\rho=\rho\) on the original accessible
interface. Use the same initial geometric and control labels
and original-name locations.

At every step the executions have the same geometric trace,
the same accessible reduced matter state, and the same
original-name locations. The spectator extension may initially
be entangled.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
For any linear map \(\Phi\),
\begin{equation}
 \Tr_N[(\Phi\otimes\id_N)(X)]
       =\Phi(\Tr_NX).
 \label{eq:restriction}
\end{equation}
This follows by expansion in matrix units on \(N\).
A matter step therefore preserves equality of accessible
reductions. Equal reductions give equal declared state
functionals, so geometric and coupling steps choose the same
successors. Blindness makes guards, certificates, and resource
checks identical, and the same fixed location maps apply.
Induction proves the assertion.
\end{proof}

This compares an extension with its restriction. It does not
assert that all extensions with one marginal have identical
joint reference correlations, or that selective conditioning
cannot steer an untouched spectator.

%=====================================================================
\section{A four-face certificate and its supported \(3+1\) lift}
\label{sec:fourface}
%=====================================================================

This section supplies an illustration independently of the
general observation proofs. The numerical transverse family
is the one recorded in VII-E \cite{CheungVIIE}; its required
properties are proved here.

Specialize the prescribed deficit to \(\mu=\pi/2\).
Use a regular developed patch in the first quadrant, centered
at developed spatial coordinates \((20,20)\), and write its
local coordinates as \((x,y,z)\). Set \(t=c(T-T_*)\).
Numerical lengths below use one fixed length unit.

\subsection{Transverse faces, edge laws, and affine charts}

Put
\[
 p=\frac35,\quad q=\frac5{13},\quad
 a=\frac45,\quad b=\frac{12}{13},\quad
 d=b-a=\frac8{65}.
\]
For \(-1\le s\le1\), define
\begin{equation}
 F_s(x,y)=
 \max\{px+as,-px+as,qy+bs,-qy+bs\}.
 \label{eq:fourplanes}
\end{equation}
Label the four affine dominance regions \(E,W,N,S\).

\begin{lemma}[Central exchange]
\label{lem:central}
The graph \(t=F_s(x,y)\) is piecewise spacelike and
\(p\)-Lipschitz. For \(s_2>s_1\),
\[
 F_{s_2}-F_{s_1}\ge a(s_2-s_1).
\]
Its central edge is
\begin{align}
 s<0:\quad&
 x=0,\quad |y|\le d(-s)/q,\quad
 t=as,\quad \ell_-(s)=\frac{16}{25}(-s),\nonumber\\
 s>0:\quad&
 y=0,\quad |x|\le ds/p,\quad
 t=bs,\quad \ell_+(s)=\frac{16}{39}s.
 \label{eq:central-edges}
\end{align}
At \(s=0\) the central edge becomes one four-face junction.
No transverse face disappears there.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Each affine spatial gradient has norm at most \(p<1\).
Their maximum has the same Lipschitz bound.
A tangent to a face of slope \(v\) has squared norm
\[
 |u|^2-(v\cdot u)^2>0.
\]
All four functions increase with \(s\) at rate at least \(a\).

For \(E=W\), equality forces \(x=0\), and dominance over
\(N,S\) is \(q|y|\le-ds\), possible precisely on the incoming
side. For \(N=S\), equality forces \(y=0\), with
\(p|x|\le ds\). The edge tangents have constant \(t\), so their
lengths are the displayed Euclidean coordinate intervals.
At \(s=0\), each strict-dominance region contains an open cone.
\end{proof}

The rates
\[
 \dot\ell_-(0^-)=-\frac{16}{25},\qquad
 \dot\ell_+(0^+)=\frac{16}{39}
\]
show transversality. The four mixed adjacencies persist and
satisfy \(p|x|-q|y|=ds\) in their respective quadrants.

Use the following \(2+1\)-dimensional Lorentz matrices,
extended by the identity on \(z\):
\[
 C_E=
 \begin{pmatrix}5/4&-3/4&0\\-3/4&5/4&0\\0&0&1\end{pmatrix},
 \quad
 C_W=
 \begin{pmatrix}5/4&3/4&0\\3/4&5/4&0\\0&0&1\end{pmatrix},
\]
\[
 C_N=
 \begin{pmatrix}13/12&0&-5/12\\0&1&0\\-5/12&0&13/12\end{pmatrix},
 \quad
 C_S=
 \begin{pmatrix}13/12&0&5/12\\0&1&0\\5/12&0&13/12\end{pmatrix}.
 \label{eq:charts}
\]
Direct multiplication verifies Lorentz orthogonality,
determinant one, and future orientation.
On each corresponding plane the transformed time coordinate
is \(s\).

Set \(\Lambda_{i\leftarrow j}=C_iC_j^{-1}\). Every closed
ordered core word is the identity, since
\[
 (C_{i_0}C_{i_1}^{-1})
 (C_{i_1}C_{i_2}^{-1})\cdots
 (C_{i_m}C_{i_0}^{-1})=I.
\]
This proves the incoming triple, outgoing triple, and event
word identities without interpreting the nontrivial frame
changes as curvature.

\subsection{Compact transverse collar}

Let
\begin{equation}
 f_s(x,y)=\min\{F_s(x,y),2+s\}.
 \label{eq:transverse-cap}
\end{equation}
The nonhorizontal region is
\[
 R_s=[-X_s,X_s]\times[-Y_s,Y_s],\qquad
 X_s=\frac{10+s}{3},\quad Y_s=\frac{26+s}{5}.
\]
Take
\[
 K=[-14/3,14/3]\times[-6,6].
\]
The collar margins are
\[
 \frac{14}{3}-X_s=\frac{4-s}{3},\qquad
 6-Y_s=\frac{4-s}{5}.
\]
They are strictly positive throughout the parameter window.

The northeast resting collar polygon has spatial vertices
\[
 (X_s,0),\ (14/3,0),\ (14/3,6),\
 (0,6),\ (0,Y_s),\ (X_s,Y_s).
\]
Reflections give the other three. They partition
\(K\setminus R_s\) and lie at \(t=2+s\).
The collar chart is
\[
 A_0(t,x,y)=(t-2,x,y),
\]
and the core charts are \(A_i=C_i\).
Thus all transitions are \(A_iA_j^{-1}\), including their
translations. Closed mixed words telescope in the full
affine group.

\begin{proposition}[Complete transverse noncentral data]
\label{prop:edge-data}
The capped transverse patch has eight two-dimensional faces
and 25 actual edges on either regular epoch. Its noncentral
edge classes are:
\[
\begin{array}{l|c|c}
\text{class}&\text{number}&\text{length}\\ \hline
\text{mixed arms}&4&
 \begin{cases}
 (10+s)\sqrt{1921}/75,&s\le0,\\
 (26+s)\sqrt{1921}/195,&s\ge0;
 \end{cases}\\
\text{horizontal inner half-sides}&4&X_s\\
\text{vertical inner half-sides}&4&Y_s\\
\text{horizontal collar joins}&2&(4-s)/3\\
\text{vertical collar joins}&2&(4-s)/5\\
\text{outer horizontal half-sides}&4&14/3\\
\text{outer vertical half-sides}&4&6
\end{array}
\]
Every noncentral edge has length greater than \(1/2\).
The only transverse incidence change is the central exchange.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
The vertices are the two central endpoints, four inner corners,
four inner side midpoints, four outer corners, and four outer
side midpoints. The central edge and four mixed arms, followed
by the listed collar edges, exhaust their incidences.

For the incoming northeast arm, the displacement is
\(X_s(p,1,p/q)\) in \((t,x,y)\).
Its squared norm is
\(X_s^2\,1921/625\).
For the outgoing arm use \(Y_s(q,q/p,1)\), with squared norm
\(Y_s^2\,1921/1521\).
These give the arm formulas, which agree at zero.
All remaining edges are horizontal and have the listed
Euclidean lengths.

The smallest collar-join length is \(3/5\); the arms exceed
\(3\sqrt{1921}/25\). All faces have open interiors:
core faces near their inner side midpoints and collar faces
by the strict margins. The central dominance calculation
then isolates the only transverse incidence change.
\end{proof}

\subsection{A genuinely supported \(3+1\)-dimensional marking}

A transverse \(2+1\) picture alone is not a compactly supported
hypersurface marking in \(3+1\) dimensions.
Define
\begin{align}
 L_s(z)&=s-4+\frac12\max\{|z|-1,0\},\nonumber\\
 \widehat f_s(x,y,z)
 &=\min\{2+s,\max\{F_s(x,y),L_s(z)\}\}.
 \label{eq:three-dimensional-cap}
\end{align}
Use the spatial box
\[
 \widehat K=K\times[-14,14].
\]

\begin{proposition}[Supported lift]
\label{prop:lift}
The graphs \(t=\widehat f_s\) are continuous piecewise
spacelike hypersurface markings with spatial Lipschitz constant
at most \(3/5\). They are strictly ordered:
\[
 \widehat f_{s_2}-\widehat f_{s_1}
       \ge\frac45(s_2-s_1).
\]
They equal \(t=2+s\) near \(\partial\widehat K\), and coincide
with the transverse capped family for \(|z|\le1\).

They extend by the horizontal marking outside \(\widehat K\)
on the regular conical product. The modification has compact
spatial support disjoint from \(\mathcal W\).
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
The affine pieces have spatial gradients among
\[
 (\pm p,0,0),\quad(0,\pm q,0),\quad
 (0,0,\pm1/2),\quad 0.
\]
Minima and maxima preserve the common Lipschitz bound.
Their parameter slopes are at least \(a=4/5\), proving
strict ordering.

For \(|z|\le1\), \(L_s=s-4<-3\), while \(F_s\ge-4/5\).
Thus the lift agrees with \eqref{eq:transverse-cap}.
For \(|z|\ge13\), \(L_s\ge2+s\), and the graph is horizontal.
Near the lateral boundary of \(K\), the transverse collar
already has height \(2+s\).
This proves boundary matching and compact support.

Translation by \((20,20)\) places the entire box in a regular
first-quadrant chart of the \(\mu=\pi/2\) cone.
The local isometry pulls the construction back.
Outside the box the marking is unchanged.
\end{proof}

For an affine piece \(t=v\cdot x+\beta(s)\), a fully specified
adapted chart is the standard Lorentz boost
\[
 B_v^0=\gamma_v(t-v\cdot x),\qquad
 B_v^{\rm sp}
 =x+\left[
 \frac{\gamma_v-1}{|v|^2}(v\cdot x)-\gamma_vt
 \right]v,
 \quad \gamma_v=(1-|v|^2)^{-1/2},
\]
followed by time translation
\((s-\gamma_v\beta(s))e_0\).
For \(v=0\), use its continuous identity-boost value.
Thus every lifted piece has an explicit affine chart,
and all closed transition products still telescope.

The four-face statement concerns the transverse section
\(|z|\le1\). In the full lift its junction is extended in the
axial direction. We do not relabel it as an isolated
\(3+1\)-dimensional particle event, nor claim a catalogue of
all additional taper incidences.

\subsection{Intrinsic angle defect is not ambient curvature}

Let
\[
 A=\arccos(-1121/1921),\qquad
 B=\arccos(671/1921).
\]
At the transverse central event, dot products of the two
boundary rays within an \(E\)-face give cosine
\(-1121/1921\); within an \(N\)-face they give \(671/1921\).
The other two faces are reflections. Hence
\begin{equation}
 \kappa_0=2\pi-2A-2B<0.
 \label{eq:angle-defect}
\end{equation}
To check the sign, \(A>\pi/2\), and
\[
 \cos(\pi-A)=1121/1921>671/1921=\cos B.
\]
Thus \(B>\pi-A\).

At an incoming triple junction, the two equal face angles
have sum \(\pi+A\), and the remaining angle is \(B\).
For example the equal-angle cosine is
\(-39/\sqrt{1921}\), and the double-angle identity gives
that sum. The defect is \(\pi-A-B=\kappa_0/2\).
The outgoing calculation interchanges the two pairs and has
the same result.

The marking therefore redistributes a transverse intrinsic
angle defect while the ambient metric remains fixed and
locally flat. This is not a bounce or the creation of
spacetime curvature.

\subsection{Exact guard, locations, and finite reversible encoding}

Let \(Q_-\), \(Q_+\) denote the two regular transverse epochs
and \(Q_{0^-},Q_{0^+}\) their event germs.
At the event, retained central edge slots have zero length
and realize the same junction; they are metadata, not regular
embedded one-cells.

The forward event rule has guard
\begin{equation}
 s=0,\qquad \mathrm{mode}=0,\qquad \mathrm{permission}\ge1.
 \label{eq:guard}
\end{equation}
It changes the mode to one, spends one permission, and chooses
the outgoing germ without advancing \(s\).
A fixed abstract location map sends the incoming central slot
and its endpoint labels to the outgoing event-junction slot;
persistent labels are unchanged.
No physical matter is transported through the patch by this
metadata rule. If a spectator has an abstract location there,
its location history is separately reserved.

Fix a finite parameter grid
\[
 s=j2^{-d_0},\qquad -2^{d_0}\le j\le2^{d_0},
\]
stored exactly. Store rounded length reports only as reports.
A rounded zero length cannot replace the exact guard:
if \(\ell=v(-s)\), floor quantization at resolution \(\varepsilon\)
reports zero for \(0\le-s<\varepsilon/v\).

Let \(x\) be a tuple of valid location words and
\(\tau(x)\) its fixed event transport.
On valid forward codewords prescribe
\begin{equation}
 (0,k,j=0,\mathrm{reports},x,0_{\rm hist})
 \longmapsto
 (1,k-1,j=0,\mathrm{reports},\tau(x),x_{\rm hist}).
 \label{eq:event-code}
\end{equation}
At zero, both central reports are zero and all common
noncentral formulas agree, so the report words remain valid.

\begin{lemma}[Decoder-correct reversible implementation]
\label{lem:event-code}
The finite map \eqref{eq:event-code} has a permutation extension
to the complete binary code space. That permutation has an exact
NOT--CNOT--Toffoli implementation with clean work uncomputed.
It acts as the identity on internal matter.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The output history determines \(x\), and its permission
determines \(k\), so the forward map is injective.
Input and output sets are disjoint because their modes differ.
Exchange each valid input with its designated output, and fix
all other strings. The exchanges are disjoint transpositions.
The decoder reads exactly the outgoing germ, spent permission,
and transported locations.

For completeness, any transposition of two \(N\)-bit strings
can be synthesized along a Gray path between them.
The symmetric sequence of adjacent transpositions exchanges
the endpoints and fixes intermediate strings.
An adjacent transposition is a NOT on the differing bit,
controlled on all other bits. Negative controls are converted
by NOT gates; the conjunction of positive controls is computed
with Toffoli gates into clean work, used once, and uncomputed.
Apply this construction to the finite transposition list.
History is deliberately retained; it is not clean work.
\end{proof}

If the code has \(N_E\) bits, at most
\(\max\{N_E-2,0\}\) clean conjunction bits suffice for this
construction. This is a finite reversible existence proof,
not a reported compilation.

\begin{theorem}[One supported four-face certificate]
\label{thm:certificate}
The preceding family supplies a local certificate containing:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item piecewise spacelike ordered markings and transverse
incoming/outgoing central edge laws;
\item complete transverse edge data, affine charts, and exact
ordered products;
\item a compact transverse collar and a compactly supported
\(3+1\)-dimensional lift matching a fixed horizontal exterior;
\item a transition stratum with exact guard and fixed abstract
location transport;
\item a decoder-correct reversible finite event implementation,
with separately charged history and spectator reserves.
\end{enumerate}
It is a type-A transverse incidence illustration only.
It changes neither \(\mu\), \(\mathcal W\), nor \(J_\mu\).
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Lemma~\ref{lem:central} supplies (i).
The explicit charts and Proposition~\ref{prop:edge-data}
supply (ii).
The collar construction and Proposition~\ref{prop:lift}
supply (iii).
The event definitions and Lemma~\ref{lem:event-code}
supply (iv)--(v).
The construction lies in one regular developing patch and is
horizontal near its boundary. It changes no global gluing
map or worldsheet data.
\end{proof}

The connection with polygonal descriptions of \(2+1\) gravity
is contextual \cite{DJH,CheungVIIE}. No polygon Hamiltonian,
particle hop, field equation, or global transition catalogue
is deduced.

%=====================================================================
\section{Contract G: finite completely positive hybrid evolution}
\label{sec:hybrid}
%=====================================================================

Let \(\mathsf G\) be a finite classical label set. Each label
contains every variable used by the controller:
geometric marking, permission, relevant records, and control
memory. Matter occupies a fixed \(d\)-dimensional space \(H\).
Set
\[
 \XX_{\mathsf G}=\bigoplus_{g\in\mathsf G}\BB(H),\qquad
 \langle B,X\rangle=\sum_g\Tr(B_gX_g).
\]
States have \(X_g\ge0\) and \(\sum_g\Tr X_g=1\).
The blocks are subnormalized; their normalization is not part
of the unconditional evolution.

A certified edge \(g\to h\) includes all changed classical
data, exact guards, geometric matching, and location maps.
No edge certificate is inferred from its probability alone.

\begin{theorem}[Finite hybrid structure]
\label{thm:structure}
A linear map between finite direct sums is completely positive
and trace preserving exactly when it has branch form
\begin{equation}
 (\FF X)_h=\sum_g\Psi_{h|g}(X_g),\qquad
 \Psi_{h|g}(X)=\sum_\nu K_{h|g,\nu}XK_{h|g,\nu}^\dagger,
 \label{eq:hybrid-map}
\end{equation}
with
\begin{equation}
 \sum_{h,\nu}K_{h|g,\nu}^\dagger K_{h|g,\nu}=I_H
 \quad\text{for every }g.
 \label{eq:branch-complete}
\end{equation}
Its adjoint is
\[
 (\FF^*B)_g=\sum_h\Psi_{h|g}^*(B_h).
\]

A canonical channel on the full matrix space has Kraus operators
\[
 \ket h\bra g\otimes K_{h|g,\nu}.
\]
It discards off-diagonal input label blocks and produces
block-diagonal output. It is a specified lift, not a
reconstruction of quantum geometric coherences.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
After adjoining any matrix ancilla, a positive direct-sum
input has positive blocks. Complete positivity of the branches
and summation prove complete positivity of \(\FF\).
Equation~\eqref{eq:branch-complete} gives trace preservation.

Conversely, compose a given completely positive map with
injection into input block \(g\) and projection onto output
block \(h\). These maps give completely positive branches.
For a map between matrix algebras, its Choi matrix is positive;
diagonalizing that matrix and unvectorizing its rank-one
terms gives the displayed Kraus representation
\cite{Choi}. Trace preservation on each input block gives
\eqref{eq:branch-complete}.

The adjoint follows by pairing. Multiplication of the lifted
Kraus operators gives the full identity as their sum of squared
moduli, and their action uses only diagonal input blocks.
\end{proof}

The table \(\Psi_{h|g}\) is fixed independently of the current
unknown density operator. Matter dependence enters through
Born probabilities
\[
 p(h|g,\rho)=\Tr(E_{h|g}\rho),\qquad
 E_{h|g}=\Psi_{h|g}^*(I).
\]
An undeclared state-dependent compiler is not part of this law.

Composition is explicit:
\[
 (\Lambda\circ\Psi)_{k|g}
       =\sum_h\Lambda_{k|h}\circ\Psi_{h|g}.
\]
Completeness follows by summing its adjoint effects.
Certificates concatenate along the declared paths; this does
not create a certificate for a previously uncertified edge.

\subsection{Intrinsic observation and histories}

\begin{theorem}[Hybrid observation criterion]
\label{thm:observation}
For observation spaces in finite direct sums,
preservation of agreement for all states is equivalent to
\[
 \FF^*(\OO_{\rm out})\subseteq\OO_{\rm in}.
\]
For
\(\OO_{\rm in}=\bigoplus_g\AA_g\) and
\(\OO_{\rm out}=\bigoplus_h\BB_h\), this is equivalent to
\[
 \Psi_{h|g}^*(\BB_h)\subseteq\AA_g
 \qquad(g,h).
\]
In particular, successor probabilities depend only on
\(\rho|_{\AA_g}\) exactly when \(E_{h|g}\in\AA_g\) for every \(h\).
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Use the faithful-state perturbation argument of
Theorem~\ref{thm:composition} within the direct-sum algebra.
An output observable can have just one nonzero block, proving
necessity of every branch inclusion. Summation proves
sufficiency. Apply the same argument to the single effect
\(E_{h|g}\) for the final statement.
\end{proof}

This is the direct-sum specialization of a general adjoint
criterion, not a new general channel theorem.

For a finite sequence of fixed tables and a history
\(\gamma=(g_0,\ldots,g_n)\), define
\begin{equation}
 X_\gamma=
 \Psi^{(n)}_{g_n|g_{n-1}}\cdots
 \Psi^{(1)}_{g_1|g_0}(X_{g_0}),\qquad
 \mathcal H_n(X)=\bigoplus_\gamma X_\gamma.
 \label{eq:history}
\end{equation}
The history map is a channel: each path map is completely
positive, and summing the last successor, then the preceding
ones, proves trace preservation.

\begin{theorem}[History-sensitive observation]
\label{thm:histories}
Suppose observation spaces satisfy the branchwise closure
\begin{equation}
 \Psi_{h|g}^{(t)*}(\OO_{t,h})
       \subseteq\OO_{t-1,g}.
 \label{eq:history-closure}
\end{equation}
Initial agreement on \(\bigoplus_g\OO_{0,g}\) implies:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item equality of all geometric history probabilities;
\item agreement of every unnormalized history block on its
declared terminal observation space;
\item agreement of normalized conditional expectations on
every positive-probability history.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Pull a terminal \(B\in\OO_{n,g_n}\) backward along its fixed
history. Repeated application of \eqref{eq:history-closure}
places the pullback in \(\OO_{0,g_0}\).
Pairing proves (ii); \(B=I\) proves (i).
Divide by the same positive probability for (iii).
\end{proof}

Branch closure is necessary for the corresponding universal
one-step comparison at every node, by
Theorem~\ref{thm:observation}. It is not asserted necessary
for accidental agreement on one input or one terminal test.

\begin{example}[An aggregate continuation can hide branch failure]
\label{ex:branch-failure}
Let the input observation algebra be
\(\Span\{I,Z\}\). Let
\[
 \Psi_+(X)=\tfrac12HXH,\qquad
 \Psi_-(X)=\tfrac12HZ\,X\,ZH,
\]
where \(H\) is the Hadamard matrix.
The summed channel has zero output \(Z\)-expectation on every
input, so it preserves agreement for that terminal observation.
But
\[
 \Psi_+^*(Z)=X/2,\qquad \Psi_-^*(Z)=-X/2.
\]
The inputs \(\proj+\) and \(\proj-\) agree on the input
diagonal algebra and have the same outcome probabilities,
yet their conditioned \(Z\)-expectations differ.
\end{example}

\begin{proposition}[Minimal backward boundary]
\label{prop:minimal}
For a fixed horizon and terminal observation spaces, define
\[
 \OO_{t-1,g}
 =\Span_{\CC}\left(
 \{I\}\cup\bigcup_h\Psi_{h|g}^{(t)*}(\OO_{t,h})
 \right).
\]
These are the smallest observation spaces satisfying
\eqref{eq:history-closure}. Agreement on their initial direct
sum is equivalent to agreement of all complete
history-conditioned terminal expectations.

For a stationary table and geometry-only reports, iteration
from \(\OO_g^{(0)}=\CC I\) stabilizes after at most
\(|\mathsf G|(d^2-1)\) strict enlargements.
The stable space characterizes agreement of all finite
geometric history laws.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Adjoints preserve adjoints, so the recursively defined spans
are observation spaces. Any closed family must contain these
spans, proving minimality. The recursively generated elements
are precisely spans of pathwise pullbacks. The inserted
identity contributes no independent condition because
\(\sum_h\Psi_{h|g}^*(I)=I\).

For stationary iteration, the sum of dimensions starts at
\(|\mathsf G|\) and is at most \(|\mathsf G|d^2\).
An iteration without enlargement is already fixed.
Path effects generate exactly the stable space.
\end{proof}

No multiplicative closure is required. Replacing the minimal
space by its generated algebra may expose more information
than the chosen histories need.

\begin{theorem}[Spectator consistency for Contract G]
\label{thm:spectators-G}
Assume complete spectator blindness and an initial extension
with
\(\Tr_N\widetilde X_g=X_g\) for every \(g\).
For every complete history,
\[
 \Tr_N\widetilde X_\gamma=X_\gamma.
\]
Thus all history laws, restricted unnormalized residual blocks,
certificates, and original-name locations agree.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Equation~\eqref{eq:restriction} applies to each selective
branch. Induction along a path proves the block identity.
The hypotheses retain the same path labels, exact guards,
controller tables, and certificates. The assertion includes
zero-probability paths as zero blocks.
\end{proof}

%=====================================================================
\section{Recovery obstruction, deterministic packets, and balance}
\label{sec:recovery}
%=====================================================================

The recovery theorem in this section concerns the entire
quantum input algebra \(\BB(H)\), not merely one observable
or a classical subset of states.

\begin{theorem}[Exact recovery and a constant complement]
\label{thm:decouple}
Let \(\NN:\BB(H)\to\BB(K)\) be a finite-dimensional channel.
The following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item a channel \(\mathcal R\) satisfies
\(\mathcal R\NN=\id_{\BB(H)}\);
\item a complementary channel is constant:
\(\NN^c(X)=\Tr(X)\sigma\);
\item its Kraus operators satisfy
\[
 A_\alpha^\dagger A_\beta=\lambda_{\alpha\beta}I_H
\]
for a positive matrix \(\lambda\);
\item after unitary mixing of Kraus operators,
\[
 \NN(X)=\sum_jp_jV_jXV_j^\dagger,\qquad
 V_i^\dagger V_j=\delta_{ij}I_H,\qquad
 p_j>0,\quad\sum_jp_j=1.
\]
\end{enumerate}
All recovery identities hold completely under references.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
A Kraus dilation gives
\[
 (\NN^c(X))_{\alpha\beta}
       =\Tr(A_\beta^\dagger A_\alpha X),
\]
so (ii) and (iii) are equivalent.

Suppose \(\mathcal R\) has Kraus operators \(B_\nu\).
The composed Kraus operators \(B_\nu A_\alpha\) represent the
identity channel. Its Choi matrix has rank one, so every
\(B_\nu A_\alpha=c_{\nu\alpha}I\).
Consequently
\[
 A_\alpha^\dagger A_\beta
 =\sum_\nu A_\alpha^\dagger B_\nu^\dagger B_\nu A_\beta
 =\sum_\nu\overline{c_{\nu\alpha}}c_{\nu\beta}I.
\]
This proves (i)\(\Rightarrow\)(iii).

Diagonalize the positive matrix \(\lambda\) by a unitary
mixing of the Kraus operators. Nonzero transformed operators
have products \(L_i^\dagger L_j=p_i\delta_{ij}I\).
Set \(V_i=L_i/\sqrt{p_i}\), obtaining (iv).
Their range projections are orthogonal. With
\(P=\sum_iV_iV_i^\dagger\), the map
\[
 \mathcal R(Y)=
 \sum_iV_i^\dagger YV_i+\Tr((I-P)Y)\tau_H
\]
is completely positive and trace preserving for any fixed
state \(\tau_H\). It recovers every matrix unit and hence every
operator. Tensoring the identity proves complete recovery.
\end{proof}

This is the full-input form of the standard error-correction
and information--disturbance structure
\cite{KnillLaflamme,KSW}; the explicit proof fixes our domain.

\begin{corollary}[An informative classical record prevents full recovery]
\label{cor:informative}
For an instrument with recorded channel
\[
 \NN(X)=\sum_w\proj w_R\otimes\Psi_w(X),
\]
if some effect \(E_w=\Psi_w^*(I)\) is not scalar, no channel
recovers every input from the entire recorded output,
including its residual.
\end{corollary}

\begin{proof}
Choose branch Kraus operators \(K_{w,\nu}\).
A dilation can duplicate the classical outcome into its
environment:
\[
 V\psi=\sum_{w,\nu}
 \ket w_R\otimes K_{w,\nu}\psi\otimes\ket{w,\nu}_E.
\]
The environmental marginal has outcome-\(w\) probability
\(\Tr(E_w\rho)\). A constant complement would make this
probability independent of every input, requiring
\(E_w=p_wI\). Apply Theorem~\ref{thm:decouple}.
\end{proof}

A constant record law is necessary, not sufficient, for full
recovery. A replacement channel has a constant record and is
not reversible. Conversely, random unitary branches with
input-independent recorded probabilities can be corrected
using the record.

The corollary does not prohibit copying already classical
data. It also does not preclude recovery on a proper code
subspace or preservation of a named commutative algebra.

\begin{proposition}[Deterministic packet selection]
\label{prop:affine}
Let a convex domain of states be mapped affinely to classical
probability distributions. If every output is a point mass,
the output label is constant.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
If \(\rho_0,\rho_1\) have different point-mass outputs, an
interior convex combination has the corresponding nontrivial
mixture, not a point mass.
\end{proof}

Thus a nonconstant deterministic expectation-to-packet rule,
such as the comparison called Option N, cannot be promoted
unchanged to the unconditional classical output of an affine
channel. Such a nonlinear rule may be studied under a
different contract. A supplied source token is not a
measurement extracting an expectation from unknown matter
\cite{CheungPackets}.

\begin{proposition}[Operator balance and resource balance]
\label{prop:energy}
For declared Hermitian observables \(H_g\), preservation of
their expected value for every hybrid input is equivalent to
\begin{equation}
 \sum_h\Psi_{h|g}^*(H_h)=H_g\qquad(g\in\mathsf G).
 \label{eq:operator-balance}
\end{equation}
The branch intertwinings
\(H_hK_{h|g,\nu}=K_{h|g,\nu}H_g\) are sufficient.
A uniform operator defect at most \(\epsilon\) gives a
one-step expectation error at most \(\epsilon\), and at most
\(n\epsilon\) after \(n\) steps for one common observable.

Separately, if a permission function and edge costs satisfy
\[
 r(h)+c_{h|g}=r(g)
\]
on every supported branch, then each history obeys
\[
 r(g_n)+\sum_{j=1}^nc_{g_j|g_{j-1}}=r(g_0).
\]
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Pair \(\FF^*H-H\) with every state supported in one block.
The branch sufficiency follows by summing
\(K^\dagger H_hK=K^\dagger KH_g\).
For a normalized hybrid state, the absolute defect expectation
is bounded by the largest block operator norm.
Iteration proves the accumulated bound.
The resource identity telescopes pathwise.
\end{proof}

Calling \(H\) ``energy'' does not provide a physical
Hamiltonian, reservoir, work budget, or Einstein equation.
Permission costs are not automatically physical energies.

%=====================================================================
\section{A finite model selecting ordered slices}
\label{sec:model}
%=====================================================================

This construction does not use the four-face family or its event
rule. It uses only the prescribed conical product and finite
matrices, adapting the ordered-slice example of VII-G
\cite{CheungVIIG}.

Fix an integer \(B\ge1\), physical times \(\tau>0\) and
\(0<\delta<\tau\), and define
\begin{equation}
 \mathsf G_B=
 \{(k,q):0\le k\le B,\ |q|\le k,\ q\equiv k\pmod2\}.
 \label{eq:labels}
\end{equation}
A label denotes the horizontal regular marking
\begin{equation}
 T(k,q)=T_0+k\tau+\delta q,\qquad r(k,q)=B-k.
 \label{eq:slice-time}
\end{equation}
The nominal controller tick \(k\tau\), selected slice time
\(T(k,q)\), and physical times of local gate implementations
are different declared quantities.

For \(k<B\), set
\[
 \Gamma_a(k,q)=(k+1,q+a),\qquad a=\pm1.
\]
At \(k=B\), use an absorbing identity branch.

\begin{lemma}[Certificate for every successor]
\label{lem:slice-certificate}
Every successor is an admitted label and advances the selected
slice time by \(\tau+a\delta>0\).
Each marking is embedded and spacelike on the regular product.
The same spatial cells and any fixed compact regular collar
are used on every label. Original-name cell transport is the
identity, permission decreases by one, and the complete
peripheral affine word remains \(J_\mu\).
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The bounds and parity in \eqref{eq:labels} are preserved.
A horizontal slice has induced metric equal to the spatial
metric of \eqref{eq:cone}. Formula~\eqref{eq:slice-time}
gives the positive increment.
Horizontal time translation commutes with \(J_\mu\); it
creates no time or axial shift in the peripheral word.
No spatial cell or conical parameter changes.
\end{proof}

Only compact regular portions are used by the operations.
The extension of a marking toward the completion is
background metadata, not an interaction with \(\mathcal W\)
and not a claim that these slices are global Cauchy surfaces.

Let matter be one qubit. Set
\[
 P_j=\proj j,\qquad Q=P_1-P_0,\qquad
 E_a=\frac12(I+a\eta Q),\qquad M_a=E_a^{1/2},
 \quad 0\le\eta\le1,
\]
and
\begin{equation}
 U_{k,q}=e^{-i\vartheta_{k,q}Q},\qquad
 \vartheta_{k,q}=\frac{\pi q}{8}.
 \label{eq:phases}
\end{equation}
For an active input \(g\),
\begin{equation}
 \Psi_{\Gamma_a(g)|g}(X)
       =U_{\Gamma_a(g)}M_aXM_aU_{\Gamma_a(g)}^\dagger.
 \label{eq:model-branches}
\end{equation}

\begin{proposition}[Source, observation, and coherence]
\label{prop:model-formulas}
The branches are complete and their probabilities are
\[
 p_a(\rho)=\frac12(1+a\eta\Tr(Q\rho)).
\]
The diagonal algebra
\(\AA_Z=\Span_{\CC}\{P_0,P_1\}\) is branchwise invariant
under the adjoints. All geometric history laws therefore
depend only on the initial populations.

Before feedback, the summed source channel preserves
populations and multiplies off-diagonal entries by
\[
 r_\eta=\sqrt{1-\eta^2}.
\]
For \(x=\delta q\), one active increment has
\[
 \mathbb E[\Delta x|\rho]=\delta\eta\Tr(Q\rho),\qquad
 \operatorname{Var}(\Delta x|\rho)
       =\delta^2\bigl(1-\eta^2\Tr(Q\rho)^2\bigr).
\]
Also the unconditional observable identity is
\[
 \sum_a M_aU_{\Gamma_a(g)}^\dagger
             Q U_{\Gamma_a(g)}M_a=Q.
\]
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
The effects are positive and sum to the identity, proving
completeness and the probabilities.
All branch matrices are diagonal, proving adjoint closure.
Their two eigenvalue cross products each equal \(r_\eta/2\);
their squared eigenvalues sum to one on each sector.
This gives the coherence factor.

The increment is \(\delta a\); its second moment is
\(\delta^2\), proving the moment formulas.
Finally, \(Q\) commutes with every branch matrix and
\(\sum_aM_a^2=I\), giving the operator identity.
\end{proof}

Conservation of this named observable is compatible with
information acquisition and failure of universal recovery.
It is not conservation of an unspecified physical energy.
Normalized postselected branches need not preserve its
unconditional input mean.

For a length-\(n\) active history, all branch matrices commute.
On a sector \(P_j\), the outcome probabilities are
\[
 p_a(j)=\frac12(1+a\eta(2j-1)).
\]
Thus diagonal inputs give a classical chain with fixed hidden
sector \(j\). General inputs give the mixture of the two sector
history laws, weighted by their initial populations.
The outcomes are independent conditional on \(j\), not generally
after mixing the sectors.

\begin{proposition}[Exact finite diagonal comparison]
\label{prop:diagonal}
For a start at one label and \(n\le B-k_0\), let
\(\Delta_Z\rho=P_0\rho P_0+P_1\rho P_1\).
Then
\begin{equation}
 d_{\rm tr}\bigl(\mathcal H_n(\rho),
                    \mathcal H_n(\Delta_Z\rho)\bigr)
       =|\rho_{01}|\,r_\eta^n.
 \label{eq:diagonal-comparison}
\end{equation}
The geometric history laws agree exactly.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
In each history block the difference is a Hermitian
off-diagonal pair. Its trace-distance contribution is the
absolute value of one off-diagonal entry.
Each source step multiplies that entry by \(r_\eta/2\);
feedback changes only its phase.
There are \(2^n\) active histories. Summing gives
\eqref{eq:diagonal-comparison}.
Off-diagonal entries have zero trace in every history.
\end{proof}

A fresh pointer qubit implements each source isometry
\[
 \psi\longmapsto
 \ket+_A M_+\psi+\ket-_A M_-\psi.
\]
It extends to a unitary on pointer plus matter by completing
orthonormal bases. Readout consumes the pointer, returns the
matter, and writes one classical history bit.
Immediate and locally deferred feedback give identical full
instruments by Theorem~\ref{thm:deferred}.

The classical successor is chosen only after its required
record is available. The local deferral identity does not
replace the intermediate geometric label by a coherent
superposition of geometries.

\begin{theorem}[Finite observation-compatible model]
\label{thm:finite-model}
The model \eqref{eq:labels}--\eqref{eq:model-branches} has:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item state-independent completely positive trace-preserving
hybrid evolution;
\item a certificate for every nonzero branch, without
postselection;
\item source-sensitive successor probabilities for \(\eta>0\)
and nontrivial coherent feedback for \(0<\eta<1\);
\item branchwise population-observation closure, complete
history laws, and spectator consistency;
\item full-instrument-equivalent immediate and locally deferred
implementations;
\item exactly \(\min\{n,B-k_0\}\) source attempts after \(n\)
hybrid ticks, one permission per attempt, and at most \(B-k_0\)
retained outcome bits.
\end{enumerate}
The cone, deficit, worldsheet, and peripheral affine gluing
are unchanged.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Completeness and Theorem~\ref{thm:structure} prove (i).
Lemma~\ref{lem:slice-certificate} proves (ii).
The explicit effect and phase formulas prove (iii).
Theorems~\ref{thm:histories} and \ref{thm:spectators-G}
apply to the diagonal branch matrices and blind fixed
controller, proving (iv).
The pointer calculation proves (v).
The resource \(B-k\) decreases once per active branch and no
attempt is made at \(k=B\), proving (vi).
\end{proof}

There is no changing deficit, moving singular source, field
equation, or matter-driven gravitational dynamics.
The source and feedback are finite operational prescriptions.

%=====================================================================
\section{Equal terminal slices with unequal residuals}
\label{sec:two-step}
%=====================================================================

The following exact specialization connects the two contracts
without identifying them.

Take \(B=2\), start at \((0,0)\), and choose \(\eta=3/5\).
Then
\[
 M_+=\diag(1,2)/\sqrt5,\qquad
 M_-=\diag(2,1)/\sqrt5.
\]
The two-step path Kraus operators are
\begin{equation}
\begin{array}{c|c|c}
 h=(a_1,a_2)&q_2&L_h\\ \hline
 ++&2&e^{-3\pi iQ/8}\diag(1,4)/5\\
 +-&0&(2/5)e^{-\pi iQ/8}\\
 -+&0&(2/5)e^{+\pi iQ/8}\\
 --&-2&e^{+3\pi iQ/8}\diag(4,1)/5
\end{array}
 \label{eq:path-table}
\end{equation}
Their effects sum to \(I\): the two outer effects are
\(\diag(1,16)/25\), \(\diag(16,1)/25\), and each middle
effect is \(4I/25\).

\begin{proposition}[A finite equal-slice residual separation]
\label{prop:equal-slice}
For input \(\rho_+=\proj+\), the histories \(+-\) and \(-+\):
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item have equal probability \(4/25\);
\item select the same terminal marking \(T=T_0+2\tau\);
\item have conditional residual states of trace distance
\(1/\sqrt2\).
\end{enumerate}
Nevertheless the complete geometric history law is identical
for \(\rho_+\) and \(I_2/2\).
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
The two middle effects give (i), and their terminal \(q_2=0\)
gives (ii).
Their normalized residuals are
\[
 e^{-\pi iQ/8}\rho_+e^{+\pi iQ/8},\qquad
 e^{+\pi iQ/8}\rho_+e^{-\pi iQ/8}.
\]
For equatorial qubit pure states with these relative phases,
their overlap has modulus \(1/\sqrt2\); their trace distance
is \(\sqrt{1-1/2}=1/\sqrt2\).
Equivalently, subtract their \(2\times2\) matrices.
The final assertion follows from their equal input populations.
\end{proof}

Now retain only the coarse terminal label \(q_2\in\{-2,0,2\}\).
Let \(\FF_{\rm coarse}\) aggregate the actual middle path maps.
Define a second complete instrument \(\GG_{\rm coarse}\)
with the same two outer branches, but middle branch
\[
 \widetilde\Psi_0(X)=\frac8{25}X.
\]
The middle effect is still \(8I/25\), so the two instruments
have the same coarse record law on every input.

\begin{theorem}[Exact coarse-record instrument gap]
\label{thm:coarse-gap}
The two coarse instruments satisfy
\begin{equation}
 d_\diamond(\FF_{\rm coarse},\GG_{\rm coarse})
       =\frac4{25}\left(1-\frac1{\sqrt2}\right)>0.
 \label{eq:exact-gap}
\end{equation}
The input \(\rho_+\) already attains this distance without
a reference.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Write \(Z=P_0-P_1=-Q\) and \(\kappa_0=1/\sqrt2\).
The actual middle map is
\[
 \Psi_0(X)=\frac8{25}\mathcal D_{\kappa_0}(X),\qquad
 \mathcal D_{\kappa_0}
 =\frac{1+\kappa_0}{2}\id+
                 \frac{1-\kappa_0}{2}\Ad_Z.
\]
This follows by adding the two phase conjugations in
\eqref{eq:path-table}; off-diagonal entries acquire
\(\cos(\pi/4)=\kappa_0\).
Only the middle recorded block differs.
The diamond norm of \(\id-\Ad_Z\) is two:
the channel-difference upper bound is two, and \(\rho_+\)
gives orthogonal outputs. Multiplying by
\((8/25)(1-\kappa_0)/2\) and using half-diamond normalization
proves \eqref{eq:exact-gap}.
\end{proof}

As in Theorem~\ref{thm:residual-obstruction}, implementation
errors subtract from this ideal gap by the triangle inequality.
This is an incompatibility of declared targets, not a
hardware defect.

\begin{proposition}[A residual audit enlarges the boundary]
\label{prop:audit-boundary}
The initial diagonal algebra is sufficient for all geometric
histories in the two-step model. If the fine-history residual
observable \(X\) is additionally audited on every branch, the
minimal initial observation space is the full algebra
\(\BB(\CC^2)\).
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
The diagonal sufficiency was proved above.
For the two middle histories,
\[
 L_{+-}^\dagger XL_{+-},\qquad
 L_{-+}^\dagger XL_{-+}
\]
are \(4/25\) times rotations of \(X\) through opposite
angles \(\pi/4\) in the \(X,Y\) plane.
Their sum and difference span \(X,Y\).
The history effects already span \(I,Q\).
The minimal backward construction of
Proposition~\ref{prop:minimal} therefore gives all four
qubit matrix directions.
\end{proof}

One cannot treat coherence as inaccessible for source control
and simultaneously claim that a later coherence audit needs
no enlargement of the observation boundary.

%=====================================================================
\section{Finite clock, residual audit, and encoding limits}
\label{sec:clock}
%=====================================================================

Let the clock have dimension \(D=2^m\), with orthonormal
calibration basis \(\{\ket{\tau_s}\}_{s=0}^{D-1}\).
Let \(S\) denote the surviving finite payload.
Apply the basis change taking \(\ket{\tau_s}\) to \(\ket s\),
then destructively read all \(m\) clock names.

\begin{theorem}[Complete destructive clock]
\label{thm:instrument}
With \(D_s=\bra{\tau_s}_C\otimes I_S\),
\begin{equation}
 \Mclock(X)
 =\sum_s\proj s_R\otimes D_sXD_s^\dagger
 =\sum_s\proj s_R\otimes
 \Tr_C[(P_s\otimes I)X(P_s\otimes I)],
 \quad P_s=\proj{\tau_s},
 \label{eq:clock-instrument}
\end{equation}
is a channel. It returns the classical code and the
subnormalized conditional payload, including every untouched
reference. It consumes the quantum clock names and obeys
\[
 \Tr_R\Mclock(X)=\Tr_CX.
\]

If an outcome-selected residual instrument has operators
\(A_{s,y}\) with \(\sum_yA_{s,y}^\dagger A_{s,y}=I\), the
complete clock--audit map is
\begin{equation}
 X\longmapsto
 \sum_{s,y}\proj s_R\otimes\proj y_Y\otimes
 A_{s,y}D_sXD_s^\dagger A_{s,y}^\dagger.
 \label{eq:clock-audit}
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
The clock Kraus operators are \(\ket s_R\otimes D_s\).
Their squared moduli sum to \(I_{CS}\).
Expansion in the calibration basis proves the partial-trace
formula. Summing the diagonal clock blocks proves the
record-discard identity. The audit Kraus family is also
complete by its stated normalization. All equalities hold
on matrix units and remain valid under reference extension.
\end{proof}

The geometry does not occur in this proof.
The agreement with I-B's interface is by the explicit
formula, not by treating a clock code as the metric
\cite{CheungIB}.

\subsection{A finite payload for both separations}

Use a two-qubit clock for the four histories of
\eqref{eq:path-table}, with a declared dictionary from its
basis labels to:
\begin{itemize}
\item the fine history and its coarse terminal slice;
\item its finite branch certificate
\((k,q,r,T(k,q),J_\mu,\operatorname{loc})\);
\item a selected residual audit, for example the \(X\)-measurement
with projectors \((I\pm X)/2\).
\end{itemize}
The \(X\)-audit can be represented with one fresh pointer:
rotate to the computational basis, copy to the pointer,
rotate the surviving qubit back, and destroy the pointer.
Its residual disturbance is exactly the declared Lüders
instrument.

The history encoder is the channel
\[
 \mathcal E(X)=
 \sum_h\proj{\tau_h}_C\otimes L_hXL_h^\dagger.
\]
It can be obtained by retaining the actual source history
and preparing its corresponding clock basis code.
A coherent normal form
\[
 W\psi=\sum_h\ket{\tau_h}_C\otimes L_h\psi
\]
has the same final destructive readout because
\(\sum_hL_h^\dagger L_h=I\).
This equality is not permission to move a geometry update
past a required intermediate record.

The one-qubit witness of
Theorem~\ref{thm:residual-obstruction} is another finite
setting, with one coarse outcome and an \(X\)-audit.
It reads expectations \(1\) and \(0\) for the two ideal
residuals.

Neither finite encoder is an acquisition map from a continuum
field or an unknown metric to the register.
The payload is a finite instrument and a finite certificate
table, not a finite-qubit field instrument.

\subsection{Calibration and dictionary nonuniqueness}

Declare three maps separately:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item a clock calibration \(s\mapsto\theta_s\) and, if desired,
a history-event tag \(\kappa(s)=(\theta_s,x_A)\);
\item a rod map assigning surviving names to installed ports
and developed spatial coordinates;
\item a causal map embedding every actual scheduled dependency,
including classical control, in the prescribed conical relation.
\end{enumerate}
The selected slice heights \(T(k,q)\) are a fourth named
quantity and are not automatically the clock calibrations.
In particular, two histories can select the same slice height.

\begin{proposition}[Clock limits]
\label{prop:clocklimits}
The following hold:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item if the labels \(\theta_s\) are distinct, exact calibration
to one actual readout event,
\[
 p_s>0\Longrightarrow\theta_s=T(e),
\]
forces one deterministic code, or admits no normalized input
when \(T(e)\) is not a label;
\item \(\Mclock\) has no universal left inverse;
\item finite matrices cannot satisfy \([T_C,H_C]=iI_C\);
\item the instrument's records do not uniquely determine
the geometric dictionary.
\end{enumerate}
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Distinct labels allow at most one supported outcome and
probabilities sum to one.
For (ii), the clock states
\((\ket{\tau_0}\pm\ket{\tau_1})/\sqrt2\), with the same
payload, have identical destructive outputs.
For (iii), take the trace of the proposed commutator.

For (iv), keep all finite matrices unchanged and relabel
history times or rotate and translate the local rod frame.
Small regular laboratories for different prescribed deficits
can also carry the same finite instrument.
The record law does not change.
\end{proof}

The residual obstruction supplies a separate nonuniqueness:
even with one dictionary fixed, compatible records can conceal
different residual instruments. This is not, by itself, a proof
of geometric nonuniqueness; the preceding independent
relabeling construction provides that proof.

A multi-outcome history reading at one fixed event is therefore
not exact equality of all its distinct history labels with
that event's coordinate. No clock-conditioned Schr\"odinger
evolution is claimed without the extra hypotheses used in
En09-A \cite{CheungClockLocality}.

\subsection{Finite compression and implementation bounds}

\begin{proposition}[Finite parameter compression]
\label{prop:compressionlimit}
Fix the finite routing and geometric label dictionary.
For active source instruments with
\(0\le\eta,\widetilde\eta\le\eta_*<1\), put
\[
 L_*=\frac1{2\sqrt{2(1-\eta_*)}}.
\]
Their complete one-step channels satisfy
\begin{equation}
 d_\diamond(\FF,\widetilde\FF)
 \le\min\left\{
 1,\,
 2\left(L_*|\eta-\widetilde\eta|
       +\max_h|\vartheta_h-\widetilde\vartheta_h|\right)
 \right\}.
 \label{eq:compression}
\end{equation}
Thus finite numerical approximations to the matrix
calibrations converge in complete channel norm on this fixed
finite model. No uniform Lipschitz assertion at \(\eta=1\)
is made.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
The derivatives of the square-root diagonal entries of
\(M_a\) are bounded by \(L_*\). Also
\[
 \norm{e^{-i\vartheta Q}-e^{-i\widetilde\vartheta Q}}_\infty
       \le|\vartheta-\widetilde\vartheta|.
\]
For contraction operators \(K,\widetilde K\),
\[
 \norm{\Ad_K-\Ad_{\widetilde K}}_\diamond
       \le2\norm{K-\widetilde K}_\infty,
\]
by expanding the difference into two terms, including after
amplification. Sum over the two recorded branches and divide
by two.
\end{proof}

For compatible finite channel sequences, the same
one-factor-at-a-time expansion gives
\begin{equation}
 d_\diamond(\widetilde\Phi_n\cdots\widetilde\Phi_1,
                  \Phi_n\cdots\Phi_1)
 \le\min\{1,\sum_{j=1}^n
                    d_\diamond(\widetilde\Phi_j,\Phi_j)\}.
 \label{eq:telescoping}
\end{equation}
Keeping history registers inside every comparison makes the
bound apply to the entire history instrument.

Conditional normalization is more delicate.
If the complete history channels are within
\(\epsilon\) in half-diamond norm, a fixed unnormalized
branch differs in trace norm by at most \(2\epsilon\).
For positive branch probabilities at least \(p_{\min}\),
the normalized conditional trace distance is at most
\(2\epsilon/p_{\min}\), by adding and subtracting one
unnormalized block divided by the other probability.
There is no uniform conditional estimate across arbitrarily
rare or zero-probability branches.

Numerical compression does not replace an exact event guard.
The reversible event rule continues to use the exact finite
parameter word \(j=0\), not an approximate length report.

%=====================================================================
\section{Typed locality, physical containment, and transport}
\label{sec:locality}
%=====================================================================

\subsection{The typed schedule bound}

Let a finite metric site set \((X,d_{\rm comp})\) carry local
finite quantum--classical algebras.
At a prescribed layer, the complete channel factors over a
partition \(\mathcal B_t\), with
\(\diam_{d_{\rm comp}}B\le\Delta\).
All control records read by a block belong to that block.

For a terminal region \(Y\), define
\[
 N_{n,n}(Y)=Y,\qquad
 N_{s,n}(Y)=
 \bigcup\{B\in\mathcal B_{s+1}:
                    B\cap N_{s+1,n}(Y)\ne\varnothing\}.
\]

\begin{theorem}[Typed schedule locality]
\label{thm:locality-typed}
Every terminal observable on \(Y\) pulls back to an observable
on \(N_{0,n}(Y)\), and
\[
 N_{s,n}(Y)\subseteq
 \{x:d_{\rm comp}(x,Y)\le(n-s)\Delta\}.
\]
Equal input reductions on the backward region, including any
retained reference, give equal corresponding output reductions.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
A block disjoint from the current backward support acts on an
identity factor. Its adjoint fixes that identity.
A block meeting the support can enlarge it only within that
block. Backward induction proves the support inclusion.
Each added point is within one block diameter of an existing
point; the triangle inequality proves the radius bound.
Equality of all pulled-back expectations proves the reduction
statement.
\end{proof}

For feedback in one fixed envelope \(R_t\), replace the
backward step by adjoining \(R_t\) whenever it intersects the
current set. The same proof applies only when \(R_t\) contains
every classical and quantum control actually inspected.
A global controller cannot be omitted from these envelopes.

The theorem is VII-E/VII-G's typed interface bound. It is not
yet I-B's physical cone containment. In particular, the
physical size of the four-face patch is not a certificate for
\(\Delta\).

\begin{theorem}[Containment in the prescribed cone]
\label{thm:locality-cone}
Suppose each actual input-output dependency edge of the
complete finite network is assigned future-causal ports in
\((M,\bar g)\). Then scheduled ancestors of a terminal port
lie in its metric past.

Operational intervention influence is contained in scheduled
ancestry. Neither converse is asserted.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Compose future-causal paths along any directed dependency
path. Transitivity gives metric containment.

An intervention outside the backward dependency region
changes maps acting only on identity factors in every
pulled-back terminal observable; its effect is zero.
Conversely, a scheduled input to a replacement channel can
be ignored by that channel, so ancestry need not imply
influence. A metric-causal pair need not be connected by an
installed network.
\end{proof}

Thus three objects remain:
\[
 \text{intervention influence}
 \subseteq\text{scheduled reachability}
 \subseteq\text{supplied conical causality}.
\]
The second inclusion requires the embedding.
This is the distinction compared with VII-J, En03-A, and
En05-A \cite{CheungTransport,CheungClockLocality}.

\subsection{A target-adapted causal route}

Choose two regular spatial ports \(x_A,x_B\) whose straight
developed connecting segment lies in a convex part of the
laboratory. Let its length be \(L>0\).
Install \(n+1\) sites
\[
 x_j=\chi^{-1}\left(
 \chi(x_A)+\frac jn(\chi(x_B)-\chi(x_A))\right),
 \quad j=0,\ldots,n,
\]
each with an equal-dimensional payload register \(S_j\).
Initialize \(S_1,\ldots,S_n\) in the same blank state \(\omega\).

At hop \(j\), use the admitted communication channel that
exchanges the contents of \(S_{j-1}\) and \(S_j\) over duration
\(L/(nc)\). Its two transfer directions have causal ports;
it is not an instantaneous spatially extended gate.

\begin{theorem}[Complete finite payload and record transport]
\label{thm:transport}
After hop \(j\), every initial payload-reference state has
the form
\[
 \rho_{S_jE}\otimes
       \bigotimes_{\substack{0\le i\le n\\i\ne j}}\omega_{S_i}.
\]
The logical channel is exactly the identity, including
references, and arrival occurs at \(T_{\rm dep}+L/c\).
All communication paths lie inside the supplied cone.

A classical record can be forwarded on the same route.
An operation conditioned on that record at the receiver is
performed only after both record and payload arrive.
The resulting complete recorded residual instrument is the
declared one with its payload relocated.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Each exchange transfers the whole payload factor and all
of its reference correlations into the next blank factor.
Induction proves the state identity.
Every hop covers spatial distance \(L/n\) in time \(L/(nc)\),
hence follows a null transfer path in the developed chart.
Its pullback is causal.

Apply the payload argument with the classical record included
in the reference. Forward its jointly classical blocks by
classical copying and causal communication. At the receiver
the code selects the same conditional maps.
No copying of an unknown quantum state is used.
\end{proof}

The protocol assumes installed communication permissions.
It is not a derivation of field propagation or an exact
null-routing theorem on every endpoint of one fixed lattice.

\begin{proposition}[No zero-duration remote SWAP]
\label{prop:instant}
A remote identity transmission or SWAP between distinct
simultaneous spatial ports is not an admitted zero-duration
operation.
\end{proposition}

\begin{proof}
Two orthogonal sender inputs give different receiver outputs.
Thus the operation has intervention influence.
Its simultaneous distinct endpoints are spacelike and cannot
satisfy the causal dependency contract.
\end{proof}

\subsection{One explicit storage ledger}

For the two-step one-qubit model, with all route payload sites
reserved in advance:
\[
\begin{array}{l|l}
\text{item}&\text{reserve}\\ \hline
\text{payload}&n+1\text{ one-qubit site registers}\\
\text{source pointer}&1\text{ fresh qubit per active attempt}\\
\text{source history}&2\text{ classical bits}\\
\text{controller }(k,q)&3\text{ bits for six valid labels}\\
\text{history clock}&2\text{ qubits, then consumed}\\
\text{residual audit pointer}&1\text{ qubit after clock consumption}\\
\text{route code storage}&5(n+1)\text{ classical bits}\\
\text{audit outcome}&1\text{ classical bit}
\end{array}
\]
Source pointers and audit pointers need not coexist with the
two-qubit audit clock, so a sufficient quantum laboratory
peak is \(n+3\), before any optional event-code carriers.
A sufficient classical reserve is \(5(n+1)+1\), with the
sender controller and history included in its route code.

If the reversible four-face code is also represented by
live quantum carriers, add
\[
 N_E+\max\{N_E-2,0\}
\]
qubits while that circuit is live. Its retained history is not
uncomputed. Spectator and external reference storage are
charged separately.

These are stated reserves, not optimality or thermodynamic
claims. Local source gates and final audits have separately
allocated positive durations. The departure time is after
the necessary local preparation and clock readout.

%=====================================================================
\section{Release, corrections, and unchanged analytical boundaries}
\label{sec:release}
%=====================================================================

\begin{theorem}[VII-E-ST local Grade S release]
\label{thm:release}
For the supported presentation and finite permissions specified
above:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\textup{(\roman*)}]
\item the observation contract has exact record and residual
criteria, a robust residual obstruction, a sharp Lüders
criterion, compatible continuations, restricted deferral,
and its spectator theorem;
\item the hybrid contract has a complete state-independent
branch representation, an intrinsic observation criterion,
history closure, its own spectator theorem, and the
whole-quantum-input recovery obstruction;
\item the four-face transverse family has explicit charts,
edge laws, a compact collar, a supported \(3+1\)-dimensional
lift, an exact event guard, and a decoder-correct finite
reversible implementation;
\item the independent finite slice instrument has a
certificate for every branch and changes no conical metric
or worldsheet data;
\item the two-step model has the equal-slice residual
separation and exact coarse-record channel gap
\eqref{eq:exact-gap};
\item finite clock readout, residual audits, parameter
compression, and reference-preserving causal transport are
constructed on their stated finite interfaces.
\end{enumerate}
These satisfy Definition~\ref{def:grade}.
Neither source contract is used as an unproved premise of
the other. The general interface results do not depend on
the four-face illustration.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Theorems~\ref{thm:pullback}--\ref{thm:spectators-E} give (i).
Theorems~\ref{thm:structure}--\ref{thm:spectators-G},
Theorem~\ref{thm:decouple}, and
Corollary~\ref{cor:informative} give (ii).

Theorem~\ref{thm:certificate} gives (iii).
Theorem~\ref{thm:finite-model} gives (iv).
Proposition~\ref{prop:equal-slice} and
Theorem~\ref{thm:coarse-gap} give (v).
Sections~\ref{sec:clock}--\ref{sec:locality} give (vi).
All five defining Grade S interfaces have been specified.
\end{proof}

\subsection{Scope corrections that matter mathematically}

\paragraph{Record and residual.}
Record compatibility is an effect identity.
Instrument compatibility is a selective-map identity.
The one-qubit witness and the two-step example exhibit the
difference on fully specified ideal targets.

\paragraph{History quantifiers.}
Branch closure gives a universal history theorem.
It is stronger than agreement of one terminal marginal.
No necessity assertion for accidental equality on a single
prepared input is made.

\paragraph{References and spectators.}
Channel equalities are reference stable.
Comparison of two different extended inputs requires their
agreement on the appropriate reference-extended observation
space. Spectator consistency compares an extension with
its restriction and requires a blind complete controller.

\paragraph{Geometry and dimension.}
The four-face construction is a transverse marking in a
regular patch. Its compact \(3+1\) lift was proved rather
than inferred by dimensional relabeling.
Its local junction, and the axial extension of that junction,
are not \(\mathcal W\).
The fixed ambient conical metric is not generated by the
marking's intrinsic angle defect.

\paragraph{Finite data and guards.}
The branch certificate is a finite specimen of a declared
family. It is not a classification of all conical transitions.
Finite numerical reports do not measure arbitrary exact real
parameters. The discrete event guard remains exact on its
declared finite code domain.

\paragraph{Recovery and observable preservation.}
An informative record excludes exact recovery of every
unknown quantum input on the full matrix algebra.
It does not exclude a named effect, a classical sector, or
an appropriately specified code from being preserved.
The finite radiation decoder of En02-C is a separate task,
not an input to this obstruction \cite{CheungComparisons}.

\subsection{Named comparisons that are not incorporated}

The supported-laboratory pattern is comparable with III-B
and V-B; represented apparatus questions with IV and IV-B;
finite-sample certificates with II and II-B; and clock,
schedule, and transport questions with En09-A, En03-A,
En05-A, and VII-J \cite{CheungComparisons,CheungClockLocality,
CheungTransport}. Their hypotheses are not silently imported.

The following objects remain separate:
\begin{itemize}
\item VII-A through VII-D and VII-I do not supply a quantum
source instrument, product domain, sharp interacting
observable, or algebra for the present model.
\item VII-H's free-scalar susceptibility is not this record,
residual instrument, or inherited characteristic coefficient.
\item III's equation-space rows and its unconstructed sourced
successor are not the direct-sum channel.
\item IX-A through IX-E, X-G, and XI-G are different interface
or admission questions and are not repaired here.
\item VII-F's three-to-six particle event is not the four-face
marking, not \(\mathcal W\), and not a premise of the finite
slice model. A readiness record cannot replace its exact guard.
\item VIII-B's packet family does not select the supplied
deficit. VIII-C's promised source token is not an acquired
expectation or a derived dynamical law.
\item Em02-E and XX-A's classical lapses, and XIX-A's clock
prescriptions, are not geometric code labels or event-time
readings.
\item En08-A's scheduler consistency does not select our cone.
En08-B's null-boundary approximation is not the installed
exact route proved above.
\item Oai282-A's finite local Ward residual has its own
improvement data; it is neither this observation boundary
nor a quantum Master Ward identity.
\item The OpenAI catalogue is not a premise or a verification.
No family supplies the cone, hybrid channel, or clock.
Family 265's static area-law question is not the exchange
or a Page curve.
\item The supplied Hawk, Psy, and Em packet records are not
identified with this observation package.
\end{itemize}
These are documentary comparisons in the supplied source
dossier \cite{CheungComparisons,AnalyticRecords}.

\subsection{Standing analytical stops}

This paper does not close the historical H2 requirement as
stated in XIV-H. Its release must nevertheless distinguish
that historical ending from XIV-I's constructed internal I2
amplitude. That internal construction is not the full
characteristic map still missing at I3/J2
\cite{AnalyticRecords}.

No full characteristic map, joint remainder, transverse
extension, contact compatibility theorem, or quantum
coefficient is admitted here.
The downstream quantum exit called XV-B is not opened.
This does not deny the existence of technical manuscripts
with that identifier.

XVI-N is not discharged. Within the stated XVI-O prescription,
\[
 \mathrm{O.1}=\loc{NOT_CLOSED}.
\]
Separately scoped results using enlarged prescriptions do not
update that statement or admit the inherited insertion
\cite{AnalyticRecords}.

\statementbox{Standing refusals}{%
Not spacetime emergence, Grade E, Einstein dynamics, a global
conical Cauchy theorem, or an intrinsic cone field theory.
Not a Page curve, island, interior, bounce, ultraviolet
completion, or gravity-generated-entanglement test.
Not quantized relational time without external scheduling.

Record compatibility is not residual agreement.
An informative classical record is not recovery of every
quantum input. A nonconstant deterministic packet selection
is not an unconditional affine channel.
Matter-controlled slicing is not matter-driven gravitational
dynamics.

The geometric time axis remains after clock consumption.
No quantum field coefficient, quantum Ward identity, or
physical thermal implementation is supplied.}

%=====================================================================
\section*{Declarations}
\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Declarations}

\paragraph{Authorship.}
The author field is intentionally empty for anonymous review.
Authorized authorship and affiliation metadata are required for
a signed submission. VII-E's source author field is empty.
Citation or registry attribution to N.~Cheung does not assign
authorship of this adaptation.

\paragraph{Proof and dependency scope.}
All positive claims released here have explicit finite-dimensional
or local geometric proofs above. VII-E and VII-G are source
records for the adapted contracts, not unprinted theorem premises.
The supplied long characteristic-graph programme is a distinct
unresolved programme, not a plan purportedly completed by this
finite observation package.

\paragraph{Execution and implementation.}
No successful \texttt{pdflatex} execution, proof-assistant
verification, independently executed symbolic or numerical
calculation, physical circuit compilation, experiment,
independent referee certification, or journal acceptance of
this adaptation is asserted.

%=====================================================================
\begin{thebibliography}{99}
\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{References}

\bibitem{DaviesLewis}
E.~B.~Davies and J.~T.~Lewis,
``An operational approach to quantum probability,''
\emph{Communications in Mathematical Physics}
\textbf{17} (1970), 239--260.
DOI: \doi{10.1007/BF01647093}.

\bibitem{Choi}
M.-D.~Choi,
``Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices,''
\emph{Linear Algebra and its Applications}
\textbf{10} (1975), 285--290.
DOI: \doi{10.1016/0024-3795(75)90075-0}.

\bibitem{Watrous}
J.~Watrous,
\emph{The Theory of Quantum Information}.
Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Author's book interface:
\url{https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~watrous/TQI/}.

\bibitem{CheungVIIE}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Observation boundaries for destructive quantum readout
and external geometry. Manuscript VII-E}.
\loc{VII-E.tex}, version 1, Enter Calculus Companion,
unpublished manuscript.
The source author field is empty; attribution follows the
companion's documentary record.
Relevant locators include \loc{thm:pullback},
\loc{thm:residual-obstruction}, \loc{thm:luders},
\loc{thm:composition}, and \loc{thm:certificate}.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/VII-E}.

\bibitem{CheungVIIG}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Landmark VII-G: Completely positive observation boundaries
for finite matter--geometry feedback}.
\loc{VII-G.tex}, version 1, Enter Calculus Companion,
unpublished manuscript.
Relevant locators include \loc{thm:structure},
\loc{thm:observation}, \loc{thm:histories},
\loc{thm:decouple}, \loc{prop:affine},
and \loc{thm:finite-model}.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/VII-G}.

\bibitem{CheungEnter}
N.~Cheung,
``The Enter Calculus: A Linear Quantum Lambda Calculus with
an Operational Characterization of Measurement,''
\emph{Frontiers in Physics} \textbf{14} (2026),
article 1954943.
Accepted 28 September 2026; the consulted publisher record
identifies the final formatted version as forthcoming.
DOI: \doi{10.3389/fphy.2026.1954943}.

\bibitem{CheungI}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Manuscript I}.
\loc{I.tex}, version 2, Enter Calculus Companion,
supplied unpublished manuscript.
The characterization theorem concerns its specified
strategy class and five requirements.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/I}.

\bibitem{CheungPhilosophy}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{The Philosophy of Enter: Destructive Readout, Quantum
Recovery, and the Refusal of Identification}.
\loc{EntPhil-v2.tex}, version 2.
Introductory essay, Enter Calculus Companion.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/enter}.

\bibitem{CheungIB}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{I-B-v1: A Finite Enter Spacetime:
Calibrated Destructive Time Readout on a Prescribed
Conical Product}.
\loc{I-B-v1.tex}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion, unpublished manuscript.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/I-B}.

\bibitem{GurevichBlass}
Y.~Gurevich and A.~Blass,
``Quantum circuits with classical channels and the principle
of deferred measurements,''
\emph{Theoretical Computer Science}
\textbf{920} (2022), 21--32.
DOI: \doi{10.1016/j.tcs.2022.02.002}.
\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.08324}.

\bibitem{KnillLaflamme}
E.~Knill and R.~Laflamme,
``Theory of quantum error-correcting codes,''
\emph{Physical Review A} \textbf{55} (1997), 900--911.
DOI: \doi{10.1103/PhysRevA.55.900}.
\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9604034}.

\bibitem{KSW}
D.~Kretschmann, D.~Schlingemann, and R.~F.~Werner,
``The information-disturbance tradeoff and the continuity of
Stinespring's representation,''
\emph{IEEE Transactions on Information Theory}
\textbf{54} (2008), 1708--1717.
DOI: \doi{10.1109/TIT.2008.917696}.
\url{https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0605009}.

\bibitem{DJH}
S.~Deser, R.~Jackiw, and G.~'t~Hooft,
``Three-dimensional Einstein gravity: Dynamics of flat space,''
\emph{Annals of Physics} \textbf{152} (1984), 220--235.
DOI: \doi{10.1016/0003-4916(84)90085-X}.
Context for conical and polygonal descriptions only; no
\(3+1\)-dimensional source equation is imported.

\bibitem{CheungPackets}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{VIII-B}, \loc{VIII-B-v3.tex}, version 3; and
\emph{VIII-C}, \loc{VIII-C-v3.tex}, version 3.
Enter Calculus Companion, supplied unpublished source records.
Variable-deficit packet dictionaries, deterministic Option N,
and promised source tokens are separate contracts.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/VIII-B};
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/VIII-C}.

\bibitem{CheungTransport}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Manuscript VII-J}.
\loc{VII-J.tex}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion, supplied unpublished manuscript.
Scheduled reachability, intervention influence, and
physical causal containment are separately specified.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/VII-J}.

\bibitem{CheungClockLocality}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{En09-A}, \loc{En09-A.tex}, version 1;
\emph{En03-A}, \loc{En03-A.tex}, version 1; and
\emph{En05-A}, \loc{En05-A.tex}, version 1.
Enter Calculus Companion, supplied unpublished source records.
Clock conditioning and complete-channel schedule locality
are comparisons, not premises.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/En09-A};
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/En03-A};
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/En05-A}.

\bibitem{CheungComparisons}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{Enter Calculus Companion: version-specific documentary
records supplied with this problem}.
This grouped entry identifies the supplied comparisons:
I, II, II-B, III, III-B, IV, IV-B, V-B;
VII-A through VII-D, VII-F, VII-H, VII-I;
VIII-A through VIII-C;
IX-A through IX-E, X-G, XI-G;
Em02-E, XX-A, XIX-A, En02-C, En08-A, En08-B, Oai282-A,
and the named Hawk, Psy, and Em packet records.
Grouping is bibliographic only and implies no common model,
theorem transfer, or independent verification.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse}.

The separately supplied OpenAI catalogue is attributed to
OpenAI, not to N.~Cheung. It is not a premise; no family proof
or formalization claim is verified or imported.

\bibitem{AnalyticRecords}
N.~Cheung,
\emph{XIV-H}, version 1;
\emph{XIV-I}, version 1;
\emph{XIV-J}, version 1;
technical \emph{XV-B}, version 2;
\emph{XVI-N}, revision r12;
\emph{XVI-O}, revision o70-sync;
and the separately scoped \emph{XVI-Q}, release Q11.
Enter Calculus Companion, supplied unpublished source records.
Historical H2, constructed internal I2, unresolved full I3/J2,
and prescription-specific O.1 statements are distinct.
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/XIV-H};
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/XIV-I};
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/XIV-J};
\url{https://enter.grok.me/browse/XVI-O}.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}