Manuscript Em05-B@1 · Em05-B-v1.tex · 6c050f5b
Em05-B Excitation Transfer and Referenced Information Recovery Complementary Leakage, Flagged Decoding, and Population-Preserving Noise in a Signed Fermionic Channel
Specifies version 1 of one even-parity excitation-qubit extraction channel and proves complementary leakage and improved recovery bounds. Ordinary states, channels, tensor products, and Born probabilities are assumptions of this construction, not theorems inherited from I. No result from another manuscript is a formal premise. Em05-A, Em03-H, Em04-A, En02-C, and En02-D are not premises. thm:channels is an isometry with an explicit Kraus family and a complete complement. thm:marginals and thm:information give occupation, purity, and Bell-input mutual information. prop:negativity gives the reference-accessible negativity. thm:constantComplement is the constant-complement criterion, proved locally; exact recovery holds only at full transfer. prop:pairDistances proves complementary pair-distance leakage one minus eta squared and a recovery lower bound, proved locally. thm:specified has half-diamond error one minus eta and is not the improved bound. prop:instrument is a complete flagged instrument; a flag is not postselection recovery. thm:optimalBell gives maximal decoded Bell fidelity (1 plus 4 eta minus eta squared) over 4. thm:balanced gives the improved sandwich and endpoint optimal errors 3/4 and 0. An exact intermediate half-diamond optimum is not asserted. thm:fullNoise gives (1-lambda)/2 at full transfer while the accessible marginal stays fixed. Identical marginals do not certify recovery. lem:witnesses and lem:Choi are local Pauli and Choi certificates, not imports. prop:continuumEndpoint is an independent continuum obstruction, not a numerical error floor and not a quarter-error exclusion. No numerical execution is asserted. The proposed checks are unexecuted. Independent execution is not asserted. No reported number is validated. Eta is an extraction probability, not evaporation time. This channel is not passive Hawking evaporation, not a Page curve, not an island, not a black-hole microstate identification, and not a constructed gravitational dictionary. H2, I3, and J2 remain unresolved. It does not close O.1, discharge the XVI-N insertion, or admit the XIV-XV characteristic coefficient. XVI-P is registered and is not a premise. XV-B is not opened. The series Route B is not discharged. No quantum coefficient is admitted. No compilation is asserted.
Front matter
abstractAbstractFront matter · lines 110–149
Open as its own pageWe study a specified even-parity excitation-qubit extraction isometry, its accessible channel, and its complete complement. Exact formulas distinguish occupation transfer, occupation-basis coherence, subsystem purity, reference correlations, and deterministic quantum recovery.
For extraction probability , we evaluate the complementary pair-distance leakage as and prove its recovery lower bound without importing another model. We restate and prove the constant-complement criterion for exact recovery. A specified decoder has half-diamond error ; its flagged instrument exposes off-code events without postselection. We also determine the maximal decoded Bell fidelity, , and construct a balanced decoder. Writing , these give the improved deterministic recovery bounds
The endpoint optima are and ; an exact intermediate half-diamond optimum is not asserted.
A separately declared population-preserving dephasing experiment retains its additional environment. At full transfer its optimal recovery error is , although its Bell-input accessible marginal is independent of . Complete dephasing reaches the entanglement-breaking recovery floor while preserving perfect occupation delivery. Normalized-Choi and matrix-unit estimates provide explicit referenced certification interfaces. An independent continuum argument separates the abstract full-transfer endpoint from finite-time attainability. These are finite-channel results, not a gravitational evaporation model or a Page-curve construction.
Introduction and contribution boundary
sectionIntroduction and contribution boundaryIntroduction and contribution boundary · lines 152–197
Open as its own pageOccupation transfer, coherence, entanglement, marginal purity, and recovery of an unknown quantum message are different diagnostics. A recovery task must specify both the accessible system and the required quantum output, including its correlations with an external reference.
This paper gives an exact comparison within one declared channel family. Its central separation is operational: a pure accessible marginal can contain no message information, whereas a mixed accessible marginal can support exact referenced recovery. Moreover, two experiments can have identical accessible marginals for a Bell input and nevertheless have different optimal recovery errors.
The framework is established. Exact recovery and error-correction conditions are developed by Knill and Laflamme KnillLaflamme; channel continuity and information–disturbance relations by Kretschmann, Schlingemann, and Werner KSW; and approximate recovery through an environmental fidelity optimization by Bény and Oreshkov BenyOreshkov. Our half-diamond metric is not identified with their fidelity metrics. Concurrence and negativity use the established definitions Wootters,VidalWerner.
Finite-dimensional evaporation benchmarks also have precedent Avery, and Hayden–Preskill recovery depends on its own dynamical and access assumptions HaydenPreskill. Neither construction is identified with the channel below.
The contribution here is the explicit signed channel calculation, its local recovery witnesses, a complete flagged decoder, improved intermediate recovery bounds, and a population-preserving noise comparison. All model-specific arguments are supplied in this source. Related manuscripts and the revision proposal motivate these questions but are not formal premises. No exhaustive novelty or first-in-literature claim is made.
scope. The parameter is an extraction probability, not time. The finite channel supplies no black-hole microstate identification, gravitational factorization, passive Hawking-emission mechanism, backreaction law, island construction, or gravitational Page curve. The continuum appendix concerns only its explicitly declared controlled model.
Notation, tasks, and elementary witnesses
sectionNotation, tasks, and elementary witnessesNotation, tasks, and elementary witnesses · Em05-B@1#eq:diamond, Em05-B@1#eq:optimalError, Em05-B@1#eq:optimalBell · lines 199–272
Open as its own pageAll finite-system states and channels use ordinary matrix representations. A channel is a completely positive, trace-preserving (CPTP) linear map. For matrices and states, respectively, set
For channels with the same input and output types, define
For differences of finite-dimensional channels, this is the supremum of the output trace distance over referenced input states; a reference of input dimension suffices Watrous (Chapter 3).
Let be the input logical qubit, an external reference, the accessible two-mode output, the residual two-mode output, and the decoded qubit. Logical bases of and are identified when comparing a decoded channel with . All entropy logarithms are base two.
Set
For a channel , define
For a purification of , define
These are target overlaps, hence squared fidelities against pure targets.
For an accessible channel , put
These are separate optimization problems. An optimal Bell-fidelity decoder need not minimize half-diamond error.
A replacement channel and a unitary channel are denoted by
definitionDefinition: Three output specificationsNotation, tasks, and elementary witnesses · Em05-B@1#def:tasks · lines 273–303
Open as its own pageThe following tasks have different types.
Observable readout: for a specified POVM , the target is the classical channel
No quantum preservation of the message is required.
Deterministic quantum recovery: the output is a qubit, and performance is measured by .
Instrument output: for CP maps whose sum is trace preserving, the output includes both a classical outcome and a conditional quantum state:
Matching only the outcome probabilities does not match this quantum–classical channel.
An instrument distance requires a target with the same output type. A flagged qubit output cannot be compared directly with an unflagged identity channel.
lemmaLemma: Contraction, effects, and pure-state distanceNotation, tasks, and elementary witnesses · Em05-B@1#lem:elementary, Em05-B@1#eq:BellWitness · proof attached · lines 305–343
Open as its own pageA CPTP map contracts trace norm on Hermitian inputs and therefore contracts trace distance. Half-diamond distance contracts under fixed CPTP pre- and postprocessing. For states and an effect ,
For normalized vectors ,
In particular,
Proof. For Hermitian , positivity and trace preservation give
The same argument applies with a reference. Preprocessing restricts the referenced input states available in the supremum; postprocessing contracts their output distances.
The positive and negative parts of have equal trace , which proves the effect inequality. The difference of two rank-one states has support in their two-dimensional span; its nonzero eigenvalues are . Finally, test the Bell-input output against .
lemmaLemma: Finite decoder optima are attainedNotation, tasks, and elementary witnesses · Em05-B@1#lem:attainment · proof attached · lines 345–356
Open as its own pageBoth extrema in (eq:optimalError) and (eq:optimalBell) are attained.
Proof. The Choi matrices of CPTP maps of the fixed type are positive, have a fixed partial trace, and form a nonempty compact set. Bell fidelity and the channel norm are continuous on this finite-dimensional set.
definitionDefinition: Entanglement-breaking channelNotation, tasks, and elementary witnesses · lines 358–361
Open as its own pageA channel is entanglement breaking if its output is separable from every external reference for every referenced input state.
lemmaLemma: Replacement, separability, and Pauli witnessesNotation, tasks, and elementary witnesses · Em05-B@1#lem:witnesses, Em05-B@1#eq:PauliComparison · proof attached · lines 363–404
Open as its own pageFor a decoded replacement qubit channel,
For an entanglement-breaking qubit channel ,
Consequently an entanglement-breaking accessible channel obeys .
For qubit Pauli channels, with ,
In particular, .
Proof. A replacement channel has Bell output , with Bell overlap . A normalized product vector satisfies
by Cauchy–Schwarz. Convexity extends this bound to all separable states. Local decoding preserves separability. Equation (eq:BellWitness) proves the lower bounds.
For (eq:PauliComparison), the channel triangle inequality and give the upper bound. The four Pauli outputs on are orthogonal Bell projectors; their trace distance gives the matching lower bound.
The complete signed extraction channel
sectionThe complete signed extraction channelThe complete signed extraction channel · lines 407–426
Open as its own pageTake
with ordered occupation bases
The occupations label two distinct modes or species. The fixed tensor representation is accessible bath first, residual second.
Let
Throughout the finite-channel sections, is a residual probability, not a time variable.
definitionDefinition: Phase-corrected signed extractorThe complete signed extraction channel · Em05-B@1#def:extractor, Em05-B@1#eq:Vzero, Em05-B@1#eq:Vone · lines 427–448
Open as its own pageDefine by
The accessible and complete complementary channels are
remarkRemark: Fermionic sign and representationThe complete signed extraction channel · lines 450–466
Open as its own pageFor residual creators and bath creators , expand
Putting bath creators before residual creators gives the minus sign in (eq:Vone). Both logical basis vectors have even total fermionic parity. The reference is an abstract logical register, not another occupation mode.
All partial traces and entanglement cuts below refer to the declared tensor representation. No basis-independent fermionic mode-entanglement identification is asserted.
remarkRemark: Known transfer phaseThe complete signed extraction channel · lines 468–475
Open as its own pageIf , the uncorrected occupied column has coefficients . The accessible correction yields Definition def:extractor. This phase correction is fixed independently of the logical input. Its implementation is a separate certification obligation.
theoremTheorem: Isometry, Kraus family, and complete complementThe complete signed extraction channel · Em05-B@1#thm:channels, Em05-B@1#eq:kraus, Em05-B@1#eq:complement · proof attached · lines 477–518
Open as its own pageThe map is an isometry and both declared channels are CPTP. A Kraus family for , indexed by residual occupation, is
The complete complement is
These channel identities apply with arbitrary external references.
Proof. The columns are orthogonal and the occupied column has squared norm
Hence . Reading its residual coefficients gives (eq:kraus), with
Taking the other partial trace gives (eq:complement). Tensoring the isometry with a reference proves the referenced versions.
Marginal diagnostics and Bell-input correlations
sectionMarginal diagnostics and Bell-input correlationsMarginal diagnostics and Bell-input correlations · Em05-B@1#eq:input · lines 521–533
Open as its own pageWrite
theoremTheorem: Exact marginal diagnosticsMarginal diagnostics and Bell-input correlations · Em05-B@1#thm:marginals, Em05-B@1#eq:rhoR, Em05-B@1#eq:rhoE, Em05-B@1#eq:occupation, Em05-B@1#eq:coherence, Em05-B@1#eq:purity · proof attached · lines 534–596
Open as its own pageIn the declared bases,
\rho_R &= \begin{pmatrix} 1-p+pt^2&0&0&\eta z\\ 0&p\eta t&0&0\\ 0&0&p\eta t&0\\ \eta z^*&0&0&p\eta^2 \end{pmatrix}, \label{eq:rhoR}\\ \rho_E &= \begin{pmatrix} 1-p+p\eta^2&0&0&tz\\ 0&p\eta t&0&0\\ 0&0&p\eta t&0\\ tz^*&0&0&pt^2 \end{pmatrix}. \label{eq:rhoE}For the respective occupation operators
one has
The accessible purity is
The residual purity is obtained by interchanging and .
Proof. Insert (eq:input) into the Kraus expressions. Only contributes the accessible coherence. Equation (eq:complement) gives the residual coherence . The occupation formulas follow by tracing against , using
Finally, for Hermitian , , giving (eq:purity).
corollaryCorollary: Global retentionMarginal diagnostics and Bell-input correlations · Em05-B@1#cor:global · proof attached · lines 598–614
Open as its own pageFor every logical state,
The nonzero eigenvalues of are those of . Every purified input has a pure joint referenced output.
Proof. The first equality uses . An isometry embeds a spectral decomposition without changing its nonzero eigenvalues and maps pure vectors to pure vectors.
sectionMarginal diagnostics and Bell-input correlationsMarginal diagnostics and Bell-input correlations · lines 614–626
Open as its own pageOccupation depends only on , while coherence and purity also depend on . None of these single-input marginal diagnostics is an all-input referenced recovery criterion.
Set
Its input marginal is , so .
theoremTheorem: Bell spectra and information balanceMarginal diagnostics and Bell-input correlations · Em05-B@1#thm:information, Em05-B@1#eq:BellSpectrum, Em05-B@1#eq:MIr, Em05-B@1#eq:MIe, Em05-B@1#eq:balance · proof attached · lines 627–675
Open as its own pageFor this Bell input,
including zero multiplicities. The residual spectrum follows by interchanging .
With and ,
In particular,
These spectra and numerical values are input-specific.
Proof. The Bell-input marginal matrices are diagonal. The joint state is pure and . The two marginals of a pure bipartite state have the same nonzero spectrum, as follows by comparing the nonzero eigenvalues of its coefficient matrices and . Thus and . This proves the information identities; the displayed values follow from the spectra.
remarkRemarkMarginal diagnostics and Bell-input correlations · lines 677–681
Open as its own pageEquation (eq:balance) includes classical correlations. It does not state that both outputs contain independently recoverable copies of the message.
sectionMarginal diagnostics and Bell-input correlationsMarginal diagnostics and Bell-input correlations · lines 681–690
Open as its own pageFor the declared cut , define negativity VidalWerner by
propositionProposition: Reference–accessible negativityMarginal diagnostics and Bell-input correlations · Em05-B@1#prop:negativity, Em05-B@1#eq:negativity · proof attached · lines 691–722
Open as its own pageFor the Bell-input accessible state,
It is entangled for every .
Proof. The coherence connects and , with coefficient . After partial transpose it enters the block on :
The eigenvalues are
All other eigenvalues are nonnegative. The absolute value of the negative eigenvalue gives (eq:negativity). A separable state has positive partial transpose, so strict negativity proves entanglement.
sectionMarginal diagnostics and Bell-input correlationsMarginal diagnostics and Bell-input correlations · lines 722–726
Open as its own pageThis is reference entanglement across , not entanglement between the two accessible occupation modes.
Exact recovery and complementary leakage
sectionThe constant-complement criterionExact recovery and complementary leakage › The constant-complement criterion · lines 730–735
Open as its own pageThe next criterion is an established exact-error-correction statement KnillLaflamme. Its proof is included to fix its domain and environmental meaning.
theoremTheorem: Exact recovery if and only if the complement is constantExact recovery and complementary leakage › The constant-complement criterion · Em05-B@1#thm:constantComplement · proof attached · lines 736–811
Open as its own pageLet be a finite-dimensional isometry, with accessible channel and complement . The following are equivalent:
There is a CPTP map with .
For some density operator ,
For a Kraus family read from ,
for scalar coefficients .
Proof. Suppose (i). Compose with a Stinespring isometry for . The composite dilates the identity channel.
Every Kraus operator of the identity channel is proportional to : its Choi matrix is rank one and is the sum of the positive rank-one matrices formed from the vectorized , so each vectorized lies in the span of the vectorized identity. Therefore the composite isometry factors as
for a fixed normalized . Tracing leaves the original complement unchanged, hence proves (ii).
Conversely, suppose (ii). Diagonalize , omitting zero eigenvalues. The isometry has no component in the kernel of . Write
The constant-complement identity on every matrix unit gives
Let project onto their span, and define an isometry by . For an arbitrary fixed state , the map
is CPTP. Its action on is , proving (i).
Finally,
This is a scalar multiple of for every exactly when every is scalar. Thus (ii) and (iii) are equivalent.
corollaryCorollary: Exact recovery endpointExact recovery and complementary leakage › The constant-complement criterion · Em05-B@1#cor:exactEndpoint · proof attached · lines 813–827
Open as its own pageThe extractor admits exact CPTP recovery if and only if .
Proof. For ,
is not scalar. Equivalently, the complementary basis outputs are unequal by (eq:rhoE). At , the complement is vacuum replacement and the accessible map is an isometric encoding.
lemmaLemma: Bell-projection pair-distance boundExact recovery and complementary leakage › An elementary complementary leakage witness · Em05-B@1#lem:leakageBell, Em05-B@1#eq:pairBound · proof attached · lines 831–879
Open as its own pageLet have a qubit input and complement . For any orthonormal input pair , put
Every deterministic decoder satisfies
Proof. Write . Dilate the decoder by an isometry and apply the combined isometry to the Bell input, obtaining a pure state . Its Bell overlap satisfies by the effect bound.
If , then , which already proves the claim. Otherwise project onto . After normalization this gives , whose squared overlap with is . The pure-state distance and partial-trace contraction give
Local decoding leaves the original reduction unchanged.
Pinching in its input-pair basis yields
The triangle inequality makes the left side at least , giving (eq:pairBound).
definitionDefinition: Pair-distance leakageExact recovery and complementary leakage › An elementary complementary leakage witness · Em05-B@1#def:pairLeakage · lines 881–898
Open as its own pageFor the declared extractor, define
where the suprema are over logical density matrices. These are unreferenced pair-distance diameters, not diamond distances to replacement channels.
propositionProposition: Exact pair distances and complementary sandwichExact recovery and complementary leakage › An elementary complementary leakage witness · Em05-B@1#prop:pairDistances, Em05-B@1#eq:environmentPair, Em05-B@1#eq:accessiblePair, Em05-B@1#eq:pairDiameters, Em05-B@1#eq:basicSandwich · proof attached · lines 900–969
Open as its own pageFor a unit Bloch vector , let . Then
Consequently,
and
The equatorial input pair gives the additional elementary bound .
Proof. The input difference is . Its complementary image has odd-sector diagonal entries , twice, and an even-sector block
The two eigenvalues of this block are and . Its trace norm is ; the odd entries add . This proves (eq:environmentPair). Interchanging gives (eq:accessiblePair).
Any difference of two qubit states is with . Thus the largest pair distances occur at , which proves (eq:pairDiameters).
The computational-basis accessible outputs have distance . If a decoder has error , contraction and the triangle inequality give
so . The complementary pair in the same basis attains ; Lemma lem:leakageBell gives its lower bound. For , the accessible distance is , yielding , hence .
The upper bounds follow from the specified decoder of Section sec:specified and from ignoring the input and preparing . The latter is the uniform Pauli channel and has error by Lemma lem:witnesses.
remarkRemark: What the complementary comparison does and does not sayExact recovery and complementary leakage › An elementary complementary leakage witness · lines 971–980
Open as its own pageThe complementary term in (eq:basicSandwich) exceeds when . At , those two terms are and . Neither is the best local witness available here: the equatorial pair gives , and the optimized Bell witness below gives . All these are proved lower bounds, not intermediate recovery optima.
The specified decoder and its flagged instrument
sectionThe specified decoder and its flagged instrumentThe specified decoder and its flagged instrument · lines 983–990
Open as its own pageDefine the code isometry and projector
definitionDefinition: Specified complete decoderThe specified decoder and its flagged instrument · Em05-B@1#def:specified, Em05-B@1#eq:specifiedDecoder · lines 991–1002
Open as its own pageThe decoder is
It is defined on the entire accessible space, not only the code.
theoremTheorem: Exact specified-decoder performanceThe specified decoder and its flagged instrument · Em05-B@1#thm:specified, Em05-B@1#eq:specifiedChannel, Em05-B@1#eq:specifiedError, Em05-B@1#eq:specifiedBell, Em05-B@1#eq:specifiedWorst · proof attached · lines 1004–1078
Open as its own pageThe map is CPTP and
Its performance is
Its decoded Bell state
has concurrence .
Proof. A Kraus family is , together with
Its effects sum to , proving CPTP completeness.
The odd occupations contribute . The decoded lower-right entry is , and its coherence is . This proves (eq:specifiedChannel).
The identity and replacement by have half-diamond distance one, attained on input . Homogeneity proves (eq:specifiedError). The replacement term has Bell overlap , proving (eq:specifiedBell). Every purified target overlap is at least , and input attains ; this proves (eq:specifiedWorst).
For concurrence, use the spin-flip definition Wootters, with
In the basis ,
The square-root eigenvalues of are
The positive part of the largest minus the other three is .
definitionDefinition: Flagged decoder instrumentThe specified decoder and its flagged instrument › Visible off-code events · Em05-B@1#def:flagged, Em05-B@1#eq:flagged · lines 1082–1105
Open as its own pageLet be a two-dimensional classical register with labels , meaning code and off-code. Define CP maps
and the complete quantum–classical channel
propositionProposition: Completeness, conditional states, and no signalingThe specified decoder and its flagged instrument › Visible off-code events · Em05-B@1#prop:instrument, Em05-B@1#eq:codeBranch, Em05-B@1#eq:offBranch, Em05-B@1#eq:referencedCodeBranch, Em05-B@1#eq:referencedOffBranch · proof attached · lines 1107–1164
Open as its own pageThe map is CPTP and
Writing , its logical branches are
For input (eq:input), their probabilities are
For a referenced input , put . The unnormalized branch outputs are
Whenever , the conditional state is . The unconditional reference obeys
Proof. The branch Kraus operators are precisely the code and off-code groups used in Theorem thm:specified. Their effects sum to ; attaching orthogonal classical labels makes their sum CPTP. Equations (eq:codeBranch)–(eq:offBranch) follow by grouping (eq:rhoR). Applying the same operator identities with a reference gives (eq:referencedCodeBranch) and (eq:referencedOffBranch). Trace preservation yields the final identity.
remarkRemark: A flag is not a success certificateThe specified decoder and its flagged instrument › Visible off-code events · lines 1166–1178
Open as its own pageThe code branch contains both coherent code transfer and residual-vacuum ambiguity. At it occurs with probability one, although no message is recoverable from . Thus must not be relabeled “successful recovery.”
Adding the flag leaves the flag-forgotten error unchanged. This statement concerns the declared decoder, not the possible value of the flag for other processing. Conditional normalization is nonlinear and is not a deterministic recovery channel. The no-signaling identity holds after summing all outcomes; conditional reference states may differ.
Improved intermediate recovery control
theoremTheorem: Maximal decoded Bell fidelityImproved intermediate recovery control › Exact optimal Bell fidelity · Em05-B@1#thm:optimalBell, Em05-B@1#eq:optimalBellValue, Em05-B@1#eq:BellDecoder, Em05-B@1#eq:BellLower · proof attached · lines 1185–1264
Open as its own pageFor the declared extractor,
It is attained by the complete decoder
Consequently,
Proof. Let be any CPTP decoder and abbreviate
Put
All lie in . If
a Kraus family and Cauchy–Schwarz give
The Bell overlap is therefore bounded by
Each step uses nonnegative coefficients and .
The decoder is CPTP, with Kraus operators . It has , attaining the upper bound. Equation (eq:BellWitness) gives
remarkRemark: Bell optimality is not diamond optimalityImproved intermediate recovery control › Exact optimal Bell fidelity · lines 1266–1271
Open as its own pageTheorem thm:optimalBell solves only (eq:optimalBell). It provides a lower bound for (eq:optimalError); it does not identify as a half-diamond-optimal decoder.
sectionA balanced decoder with an exact Pauli errorImproved intermediate recovery control › A balanced decoder with an exact Pauli error · lines 1273–1284
Open as its own pageFor , define a qubit channel
Its effects sum to .
definitionDefinition: Balanced decoderImproved intermediate recovery control › A balanced decoder with an exact Pauli error · Em05-B@1#def:balanced, Em05-B@1#eq:balancedDecoder · lines 1285–1299
Open as its own pagePut
and define
theoremTheorem: Balanced decoder and improved recovery sandwichImproved intermediate recovery control › A balanced decoder with an exact Pauli error · Em05-B@1#thm:balanced, Em05-B@1#eq:balancedPauliI, Em05-B@1#eq:balancedUpper, Em05-B@1#eq:improvedSandwich, Em05-B@1#eq:endpointOptima · proof attached · lines 1301–1383
Open as its own pageThe balanced decoder is CPTP. Its decoded channel is unital and Pauli diagonal, with Bloch multipliers
Its Pauli probabilities are
Its exact error is
Thus
The endpoints are exact:
Proof. A complete Kraus family for the balanced decoder is
whose effects sum to .
For a general value , its decoded excitation probability on input (eq:input) is
and its coherence is . At , the populations become , with . The channel is therefore unital with the stated Bloch multipliers. Expanding a unital Pauli-diagonal qubit channel gives (eq:balancedPauliI) and its companions.
The probabilities are nonnegative. In particular,
which proves . Lemma lem:witnesses gives its exact error . The lower bound is Theorem thm:optimalBell; the other upper bounds were proved above.
At , both and equal . At , both equal zero.
propositionProposition: Comparison of the recovery witnessesImproved intermediate recovery control › A balanced decoder with an exact Pauli error · Em05-B@1#prop:dominance · proof attached · lines 1385–1428
Open as its own pageThe optimized Bell lower bound dominates all the elementary lower bounds stated in Section sec:complementary:
At , the improved sandwich is
As ,
Proof. The first two comparisons follow directly from . For the complementary term,
For ,
Substitution gives the half-transfer values. Taylor expansion of (eq:balancedUpper) gives the endpoint asymptotics.
remarkRemark: The unresolved optimizationImproved intermediate recovery control › A balanced decoder with an exact Pauli error · lines 1430–1436
Open as its own pageThe bounds control the intermediate deterministic recovery problem and determine its leading error near full transfer. They do not solve its exact half-diamond optimum on . Neither decoder is assigned unproved intermediate optimality.
Population-preserving dephasing and its full environment
sectionPopulation-preserving dephasing and its full environmentPopulation-preserving dephasing and its full environment · Em05-B@1#eq:dephaser, Em05-B@1#eq:noiseDilation · lines 1439–1481
Open as its own pageThis section declares a different experiment: extraction followed by output noise.
On the entire accessible space, put
It is Hermitian, unitary, parity preserving, and commutes with all occupation projectors and .
For , define
and
Its isometric dilation, with a fresh register , is
After the fixed reordering , set
The complete environment is , not alone.
propositionProposition: Complete noisy channelPopulation-preserving dephasing and its full environment · Em05-B@1#prop:noisyChannel, Em05-B@1#eq:noisyComplement, Em05-B@1#eq:noisyPurity · proof attached · lines 1482–1525
Open as its own pageA Kraus family is
The complete complement is
The accessible marginal is (eq:rhoR) with replaced by . Its occupation probabilities and are unchanged for every input. Its purity is
For a Bell input, the accessible marginal is independent of for every .
Proof. The dilation has ; the displayed Kraus effects therefore sum to . Taking both partial traces gives the channel and (eq:noisyComplement). Conjugation by preserves diagonal entries and negates the coherence, so the mixture multiplies it by . Squaring the entries gives (eq:noisyPurity). For a Bell input .
propositionProposition: Entanglement-breaking boundary and exact recoveryPopulation-preserving dephasing and its full environment · Em05-B@1#prop:noiseBoundary · proof attached · lines 1527–1568
Open as its own pageThe noisy accessible channel is entanglement breaking if and only if . If , every deterministic decoder obeys
Exact deterministic recovery is possible if and only if .
Proof. At , the channel is measure and prepare:
Its referenced output is a sum of positive product operators, hence separable. At , it is vacuum replacement. Lemma lem:witnesses gives the floor .
For the Bell input, the partial-transpose calculation of Proposition prop:negativity now has coherence , so
It is strictly positive if , proving the converse entanglement-breaking statement.
If , a left inverse of would make a left inverse of , contradicting Corollary cor:exactEndpoint. The full-transfer case is settled by Theorem thm:fullNoise below.
propositionProposition: Noisy Bell optimum and balanced recovery boundPopulation-preserving dephasing and its full environment › Bounds with both extraction loss and dephasing · Em05-B@1#prop:noisyBounds, Em05-B@1#eq:noisyBellOpt, Em05-B@1#eq:noisySandwich · proof attached · lines 1572–1636
Open as its own pageFor the noisy channel,
The decoder attains this Bell optimum. Define
Then
The balanced decoder attains as its own exact error.
Proof. Repeat Theorem thm:optimalBell, replacing the coherence coefficient by . All coefficients remain nonnegative, and still attains the bound. The Bell witness gives .
The balanced decoded channel has the same population multiplier , and coherence multiplier . Its Pauli identity probability is
so Lemma lem:witnesses gives the exact decoder error .
Finally, the specified decoder yields
The channel triangle inequality gives error at most . The constant decoder gives the remaining upper bound .
sectionFull transfer: exact optimal recoveryPopulation-preserving dephasing and its full environment › Full transfer: exact optimal recovery · Em05-B@1#eq:fullNoisyIsometry · lines 1638–1661
Open as its own pageAt , put
Then , and
theoremTheorem: Exact full-transfer noise comparisonPopulation-preserving dephasing and its full environment › Full transfer: exact optimal recovery · Em05-B@1#thm:fullNoise, Em05-B@1#eq:noiseOptimal, Em05-B@1#eq:fullSameMarginal, Em05-B@1#eq:noisyMIr, Em05-B@1#eq:noisyMIe · proof attached · lines 1662–1739
Open as its own pageAt full transfer,
Both the specified and balanced decoders attain the optimum. For their decoded Bell output,
The accessible Bell-input marginal is
independently of .
With
and continuous endpoint values,
Proof. The decoded channel is . The Pauli formula gives exact error . Equation (eq:noisyBellOpt) gives every decoder Bell overlap at most , so the Bell witness gives the matching error lower bound.
Alternatively, the noisy accessible outputs of logical and have distance . Contraction gives , yielding the same lower bound for every decoder.
The decoded Bell state is
Its Bell overlap is . Its spin-flip square-root eigenvalues are , giving concurrence .
Tracing the reference gives (eq:fullSameMarginal). The environment has vacuum , and
Hence , while . Purity of gives the two information identities.
corollaryCorollary: Identical marginals, different recovery tasksPopulation-preserving dephasing and its full environment › Full transfer: exact optimal recovery · Em05-B@1#cor:separation · proof attached · lines 1741–1756
Open as its own pageThe experiments and have identical Bell-input accessible density matrices and therefore identical accessible occupation probabilities, purity, and all observables of that marginal.
Their optimal recovery errors are nevertheless and , their decoded reference concurrences are and , and their reference–accessible mutual informations are and , respectively.
Proof. Apply Theorem thm:fullNoise at the two endpoints.
remarkRemark: Why the added environment mattersPopulation-preserving dephasing and its full environment › Full transfer: exact optimal recovery · lines 1758–1769
Open as its own pageAt , the vectors are orthogonal. The complete isometry retains the message coherently in , even though discarding leaves only classical reference–accessible correlations. Keeping only the original vacuum residual would incorrectly make the noisy complement look constant.
The constant-complement criterion concerns the complement of the actual accessible channel, including every discarded noise register.
remarkRemark: Marginal equality is not channel equalityPopulation-preserving dephasing and its full environment › Full transfer: exact optimal recovery · lines 1771–1787
Open as its own pageThe complete referenced Bell output is the normalized Choi state and determines the channel. Its accessible marginal alone does not. Coherence-sensitive preparations also distinguish the noisy channels; for example,
Thus Corollary cor:separation is a limitation of single-input marginal diagnostics, not of complete channel tomography.
Referenced certification interfaces
sectionNormalized Choi and matrix-unit conversionsReferenced certification interfaces › Normalized Choi and matrix-unit conversions · lines 1792–1807
Open as its own pageThe following conventions prevent a factor-of-two or input-dimension ambiguity in a channel certificate. For input dimension , define
Here is normalized to trace one for a channel.
lemmaLemma: Choi and matrix-unit certificationReferenced certification interfaces › Normalized Choi and matrix-unit conversions · Em05-B@1#lem:Choi, Em05-B@1#eq:ChoiConversion, Em05-B@1#eq:qubitCertificate · proof attached · lines 1808–1871
Open as its own pageLet be channels with input dimension , and write
Then
For the qubit-input extractor, a valid certificate is
Proof. The Bell input gives the lower bound.
Every pure referenced input can be written
Thus , and
Convexity covers mixed inputs and gives the Choi upper bound.
Alternatively, write , where . Then
Divide by two and take the referenced supremum. The channel-distance cap one and the specialization complete the proof.
remarkRemark: What must actually be boundedReferenced certification interfaces › Normalized Choi and matrix-unit conversions · lines 1873–1898
Open as its own pageThe Choi estimate requires the full referenced state, not its accessible marginal. Matrix-unit estimates include off-diagonal units, which are not density matrices. Bounds for only and do not certify coherence or diamond distance.
One may reconstruct the off-diagonal unit from physical preparations:
where
Linearity and the triangle inequality then convert certified preparation-output bounds into a matrix-unit bound.
propositionProposition: Recovery and marginal stabilityReferenced certification interfaces › Model error, decoder error, and diagnostic stability · Em05-B@1#prop:stability, Em05-B@1#eq:purityStability, Em05-B@1#eq:occupationStability, Em05-B@1#eq:coherenceStability · proof attached · lines 1902–1964
Open as its own pageSuppose
For any fixed CPTP decoder ,
The optimal errors satisfy
For any common referenced input, the output trace distance is at most . In particular,
For a fixed decoder, Bell fidelities differ by at most .
Proof. Postprocessing contraction and the reverse triangle inequality give the fixed-decoder result. Taking infima in both directions gives optimal-error stability. The referenced output statement is the channel metric definition.
Let . Since is an effect,
The trace-zero identity gives
For distinct basis vectors , a phase-aligned Hermitian off-diagonal test operator of norm one gives
This proves the coherence bound. The Bell projector and postprocessing contraction give the final assertion.
corollaryCorollary: Certified recovery enclosureReferenced certification interfaces › Model error, decoder error, and diagnostic stability · Em05-B@1#cor:enclosure · proof attached · lines 1966–1992
Open as its own pageA channel certificate , together with (eq:improvedSandwich), yields
If an implemented decoder satisfies , then
Proof. Apply Proposition prop:stability. For the implemented decoder, telescope the composition and use pre- and postprocessing contraction.
propositionProposition: Instrument and conditional-state stabilityReferenced certification interfaces › Model error, decoder error, and diagnostic stability · Em05-B@1#prop:instrumentStability · proof attached · lines 1994–2035
Open as its own pageFor the fixed flagged decoder,
For every common referenced input, each flag probability differs by at most .
Let be corresponding unnormalized conditional reference–qubit outputs. If both branch probabilities are at least , then
No uniform normalized-branch conclusion follows as the branch probability tends to zero.
Proof. The first assertion is CPTP postprocessing contraction. Flag probabilities are effect expectations.
The flagged output is block diagonal, so . Writing , ,
Divide by two, use , and cap state distance at one.
propositionProposition: Transmission intervalsReferenced certification interfaces › Transmission and phase certificates · Em05-B@1#prop:transmissionInterval · proof attached · lines 2039–2070
Open as its own pageIf a validated calculation establishes , the ideal-phase specified decoder satisfies
For fixed known ,
Purity and the balanced upper bound can be enclosed by inclusion-preserving interval evaluation of their displayed expressions. Purity must not be presumed monotone in .
Proof. The first four quantities are affine with the stated monotonicity. The remaining expressions are explicit continuous functions on the closed parameter interval; validated outward evaluation encloses them.
propositionProposition: Implemented phase allowanceReferenced certification interfaces › Transmission and phase certificates · Em05-B@1#prop:phase · proof attached · lines 2072–2100
Open as its own pageIf the residual accessible phase error is , the noiseless specified decoded channel is
Its error is at most
With additional channel and decoder certificates , the bound becomes
Proof. The logical phase is twice the one-particle phase. For , a purified input overlap between the identity and unitary outputs is . The numerical range is the segment between the two eigenvalues; its minimal modulus is . The pure-state distance is therefore maximized at . The channel triangle inequality gives the first bound, and telescoping gives the second.
sectionTransmission and phase certificatesReferenced certification interfaces › Transmission and phase certificates · lines 2100–2107
Open as its own pageThese interfaces require a common identification of the input and accessible output spaces. A certificate for one unreferenced state is not automatically a channel certificate, and an accessible-channel certificate is not a certificate for a particular physical complementary dilation.
Conclusion
sectionConclusionConclusion · lines 2109–2141
Open as its own page{}1.12
Diagnostic or task Information supplied Transferred occupation Expected excitation delivered to the accessible modes. Occupation-basis coherence A declared off-diagonal entry for a specified input. Marginal purity Mixedness of that marginal for that input. Reference negativity Entanglement of the chosen output across . Decoded concurrence Reference entanglement after a specified qubit decoder. Mutual information Total correlation, including classical correlation. Pair-distance leakage Environmental distinguishability between selected messages. Flagged instrument Outcome probabilities and conditional quantum outputs. Bell-fidelity optimum The best decoded overlap for the maximally entangled test. Half-diamond recovery optimum The best deterministic performance on all referenced inputs. theoremTheorem: Finite-channel diagnostic separationConclusion · Em05-B@1#thm:conclusion · proof attached · lines 2142–2196
Open as its own pageFor the declared extraction and noise experiments:
The signed isometry, accessible channel, and complete complements are CPTP constructions with the stated diagnostics.
Exact recovery is equivalent to a constant complete complement. For the noiseless extractor it occurs exactly at .
The complementary pair-distance is , and the associated lower bound is proved by a Bell-projection witness.
The specified complete decoder has error , Bell fidelity , worst-case target overlap , and decoded concurrence . Its instrument makes off-code events visible without identifying a flag with successful recovery.
The exact Bell-fidelity optimum is . A balanced decoder proves (eq:improvedSandwich), including the sharp endpoint recovery errors and .
Full-transfer dephasing has exact optimal recovery error . Complete dephasing attains the entanglement-breaking floor , despite unchanged Bell-input accessible occupation and purity.
Normalized-Choi, matrix-unit, and instrument estimates provide typed referenced certification interfaces.
A single input's accessible marginal does not replace an all-input referenced recovery criterion.
Proof. Theorem thm:channels and Proposition prop:noisyChannel prove (i). Theorem thm:constantComplement and Corollary cor:exactEndpoint prove (ii). Lemma lem:leakageBell and Proposition prop:pairDistances prove (iii). Theorem thm:specified and Proposition prop:instrument prove (iv). Theorems thm:optimalBell and thm:balanced prove (v). Lemma lem:witnesses, Proposition prop:noiseBoundary, and Theorem thm:fullNoise prove (vi). Section sec:certification proves (vii). Corollary cor:separation supplies the marginal counterexample.
sectionConclusionConclusion · lines 2196–2206
Open as its own pageThe resulting model is an analytically controlled information-flow benchmark. Its exact intermediate half-diamond recovery optimum remains a separate optimization problem. A sequential evaporation-like extension would require fresh output registers, an access schedule, internal dynamics, and a complete environment at each step. Relabeling as time supplies none of these.
A declared continuum model and endpoint non-attainability
sectionA declared continuum model and endpoint non-attainabilityA declared continuum model and endpoint non-attainability · Em05-B@1#eq:continuumGenerator, Em05-B@1#eq:packetFormula · lines 2208–2265
Open as its own pageThe finite channel includes as an exact mathematical endpoint. This does not imply finite-time attainability in a continuum realization. The following independent argument concerns only the model specified here.
Let
Then . For , take an initially vacant bath level and
For finite extraction duration , use bounded, piecewise-continuous real controls and the generator
Relative to , its perturbation is bounded, self-adjoint, and finite rank. In the interaction picture, the Dyson integrals converge in operator norm on finite time intervals, giving a unitary propagator.
Define
The conserved norm implies
Variation of constants gives, almost everywhere in ,
propositionProposition: No exact finite-time continuum transferA declared continuum model and endpoint non-attainability · Em05-B@1#prop:continuumEndpoint · proof attached · lines 2266–2302
Open as its own pageIn the model (eq:continuumGenerator),
for every finite .
Proof. If , unitarity and the normalized initial state force . Since , (eq:packetFormula) implies
for almost every positive .
The bounded function is integrable on . Both sides extend to entire functions of complex . Their equality almost everywhere on a real interval, together with continuity and the identity theorem, gives equality everywhere.
At , , the left side is , whereas
The right side tends to zero, while the left side is at least one. This is a contradiction.
sectionA declared continuum model and endpoint non-attainabilityA declared continuum model and endpoint non-attainability · lines 2302–2309
Open as its own pageThis proposition supplies no uniform positive numerical error floor over all allowed controls and no exclusion at a specified nonzero tolerance. It separates finite-time endpoint attainability in this model from the endpoint identities of the abstract channel family.
Revision audit and remaining verification work
sectionRevision audit and remaining verification workRevision audit and remaining verification work · lines 2311–2375
Open as its own pageThe revision makes the following local improvements.
The complement is treated as an operator-valued channel on all logical matrix units, not merely as a pair of state marginals.
The pair-distance leakage is explicitly defined. Its recovery bound is proved with the half-diamond normalization used throughout.
Exact recovery is linked to the named constant-complement criterion, with a complete proof and a Kraus-condition check.
The initially proposed complementary lower bound is retained, but it is not presented as the strongest witness. Equatorial distinguishability and the exact Bell optimum give stronger bounds in this channel.
A complete balanced decoder supplies an improved intermediate upper bound. Bell optimality and diamond optimality remain distinct.
The decoder instrument preserves the conditional quantum-output specification. Its code label is not a postselection-based recovery certificate.
The noise complement retains , and the entanglement-breaking floor is stated for every deterministic decoder.
The Choi state is normalized explicitly. The input-dimension factors in its diamond conversion and the matrix-unit conversion are proved.
The purity-stability allowance is sharpened to using an effect test.
The continuum endpoint obstruction is proved separately, without a numerical transmission value or a gravitational identification.
Before reporting an executed verification package, one should:
compile until all cross-references stabilize and inspect the resulting PDF;
construct and independently and check their isometry identities;
trace full referenced states independently of the displayed marginal formulas;
check partial-transpose and spin-flip spectra, including singular endpoints;
verify the complete Kraus families for all three decoders and the flagged instrument;
compare the balanced decoded channel directly with its Pauli probabilities;
preserve software versions, tolerances, raw outputs, and failures for every executed check.
These are proposed checks, not execution claims. Floating-point agreement alone is not a rigorous certificate.
Declarations
sectionDeclarationsDeclarations · lines 2376–2399
Open as its own page. This single source contains the declared models, analytical proofs, and internal bibliography. No external data are needed for typesetting.
status. No compilation, numerical execution, independent symbolic execution, formal proof checking, or physical implementation is claimed.
. The general channel, recovery, entropy, concurrence, negativity, and dephasing frameworks are established. The paper proves its model-specific identities and bounds locally without using other manuscripts as premises.
physical boundary. The accessible and residual subsystems are not identified with Hawking radiation and a black-hole interior. No gravitational dictionary, Page curve, gravity-generated-entanglement test, or solution of the black-hole information paradox is established.
bibliographyReferencesDeclarations · lines 2400–2457
Open as its own pageKnillLaflamme
E. Knill and R. Laflamme, “Theory of quantum error-correcting codes,” Physical Review A 55, 900–911 (1997). DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.55.900. arXiv:quant-ph/9604034.KSW
D. Kretschmann, D. Schlingemann, and R. F. Werner, “The Information-Disturbance Tradeoff and the Continuity of Stinespring's Representation,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 54, 1708–1717 (2008). DOI:
10.1109/TIT.2008.917696. arXiv:quant-ph/0605009.BenyOreshkov
C. Bény and O. Oreshkov, “General conditions for approximate quantum error correction and near-optimal recovery channels,” Physical Review Letters 104, 120501 (2010). DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.120501. arXiv:0907.5391.Watrous
J. Watrous, The Theory of Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press (2018).
Wootters
W. K. Wootters, “Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits,” Physical Review Letters 80, 2245–2248 (1998). DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2245. arXiv:quant-ph/9709029.VidalWerner
G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, “Computable measure of entanglement,” Physical Review A 65, 032314 (2002). DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314. arXiv:quant-ph/0102117.Avery
S. G. Avery, “Qubit Models of Black Hole Evaporation,” arXiv:
1109.2911v2[hep-th] (2012).HaydenPreskill
P. Hayden and J. Preskill, “Black holes as mirrors: quantum information in random subsystems,” Journal of High Energy Physics 09 (2007), 120. DOI:
10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/120. arXiv:0708.4025.