OpenAI · 010-03 · 2026-10-06 · Number theory
Fontaine–Mazur modularity at the prime 2
preprints/Fontaine-Mazur-modularity-at-the-prime-2-October-6-2026
Family 010. Fontaine–Mazur modularity at the prime and -adic pro-modularity.
The authors are OpenAI. This companion does not verify the proof and does not adopt it as a theorem of Ngo Cheung’s series. It is not a premise. O.1 stays NOT_CLOSED. Anti-de Sitter results are not a de Sitter state, not Em02-E’s relational lapse, not XVI-P’s QdS scheme, and not XVI-Q’s sigma-image record. No quantum coefficient is admitted. No compilation is asserted.
Read against the standing problems
Standing problems. No standing problem is named in this text. It was still read against the nine problems and does not close any of them. The authors are OpenAI. The companion does not verify the proof. This is not a premise of a manuscript by Ngo Cheung. O.1 stays NOT_CLOSED. No quantum coefficient is admitted. No compilation is asserted. XVI-P · XVI-N
Every continuous odd absolutely irreducible two-dimensional -adic representation of unramified outside finitely many primes occurs in a completed Hecke algebra at some odd tame level. Also proves classical modularity up to Tate twist for irreducible odd representations with these finiteness conditions that are de Rham at with distinct Hodge–Tate weights, resolving the dyadic Fontaine–Mazur case without residual restrictions.
We prove that every continuous, irreducible, odd two-dimensional 2-adic representation of , unramified outside finitely many primes and de Rham at 2 with distinct Hodge–Tate weights, is modular up to Tate twist. This resolves the odd, regular two-dimensional Fontaine–Mazur conjecture over ℚ at 2, including all residual representations.
Preprint source and Lean scope
The abstract above is the catalogue abstract. The sections below are the full preprint source, 0 sections. This page is not only the abstract. The manuscript file is loading.
No Lean scope note is in the repository for this family. The preprint source below is still the full manuscript, not only the abstract. No compilation is asserted.