All OpenAI manuscripts

OpenAI · 101-01 · 2026-10-05 · Convex and metric geometry

A sharp entropy bound and the simplex inequality for isotropic constants

preprints/A-sharp-entropy-bound-and-the-simplex-inequality-for-isotropic-constants-October-5-2026

Family 101. The sharp simplex conjecture for isotropic constants.

The authors are OpenAI. This companion does not verify the proof and does not adopt it as a theorem of Ngo Cheung’s series. It is not a premise. O.1 stays NOT_CLOSED. Anti-de Sitter results are not a de Sitter state, not Em02-E’s relational lapse, not XVI-P’s QdS scheme, and not XVI-Q’s sigma-image record. No quantum coefficient is admitted. No compilation is asserted.

Read against the standing problems

Standing problems. No standing problem is named in this text. It was still read against the nine problems and does not close any of them. The authors are OpenAI. The companion does not verify the proof. This is not a premise of a manuscript by Ngo Cheung. O.1 stays NOT_CLOSED. No quantum coefficient is admitted. No compilation is asserted. XVI-P · XVI-N

Proves that simplices uniquely maximize the isotropic constant among convex bodies in every dimension, resolving the strong isotropic constant conjecture. Also establishes the sharp entropy lower bound for log-concave probability densities, with equality precisely for invertible affine images of products of one-sided exponential laws.

We prove the strong isotropic constant conjecture: in each dimension, simplices are the unique maximizers of the isotropic constant among convex bodies. We also prove the sharp entropy bound for every log-concave probability density on ℝm, with equality precisely for invertible affine images of products of one-sided exponential laws.

Preprint source and Lean scope

The abstract above is the catalogue abstract. The sections below are the full preprint source, 0 sections. This page is not only the abstract. The manuscript file is loading.

No Lean scope note is in the repository for this family. The preprint source below is still the full manuscript, not only the abstract. No compilation is asserted.