Manuscript Em01-C@3 · Em01-C-v3.tex · section · f0953702

Definition, evaluation, and provenance

The fixed-kernel problem and its specified inputs › Definition, evaluation, and provenance · lines 289–353

Back to manuscript

Three different qualifications are used below:

Specified but unevaluated.

A finite, unambiguous formula is available, but its component expansion or its contraction in the characteristic calculation has not been performed.

Fixed input not instantiated here.

An array or distribution is part of the mathematical data of the paper. Its particular physical realization is not independently derived here.

Inherited interpretation.

A predecessor identifies a displayed expression with a branch of the physical graph. That interpretation is not inferred merely because two manuscripts use similar notation.

A reproducible symbolic specification suffices to define coefficients. An explicit component list is not inherently required. Conversely, a component expansion does not replace a missing boundary-value prescription.

ObjectMathematical statusTreatment here
Curvature and cubic densityFinite specificationReproduced in Appendix app:source, without changing the unintegrated representative.
Weighted Euler sourceFinite specificationDerived by coefficient extraction and converted explicitly to the propagated component convention.
Specified jet coefficientsDetermined by (eq:jet-Hessian); their complete graph contraction is unevaluated.
Explicit linear mapsTheir matrices and their component contractions are fixed below.
Fixed constant bilinear mapRetained as an input; no physical component realization is independently derived.
Crossed array Fixed distributional inputIts grouped tensor-product form is retained; physical component boundary values are not evaluated.
Complete characteristic coefficientOpen calculationNot supplied by the source rule or the scalar model.

The source and the covariance package are separate inputs. Fixing the curvature convention does not instantiate the crossed covariances.