Manuscript Em01-F@3 · Em01-F-v3.tex · section · 225e59af

Specialization, not reproduction

Substitution and the weighted comparison panel › Specialization, not reproduction · lines 2107–2152

Thus a weighted $K_{8}$ would require the intermediate kernel $H_{σ_{c}, α}$ , as well as the weighted source incidence. Setting $σ_{c} = σ_{grav}$ would be a further explicit model choice.

Item	Equality or comparison	Status
Free operator and inverse	$- □_{η} P$ , $- P E_{0}^{R}$	Derived here; convention agreement with supplied XI passages.
Action–stress sign	$G_{μν} = λ^{2} T_{μν} /4$ for the invariant part	Derived here; normalization agreement, not model identity.
Coordinate leg	$L_{σ_{c}} ∣_{σ_{c} = 1} = L$	Constant-weight specialization of a displayed formula.
$K_{5, \pm}, K_{6}$ factors	The displayed weight factors disappear at $σ_{c} = 1$	Formula specialization; insertion identification not established.
Cubic source	$J_{2} = EL (ℓ_{3})$ ; $Q = D J_{2}$	Derived here. Agreement of all inherited representative/domain choices is not asserted.
Source layers	$D D_{σ_{grav}} [G] h = 0$ at constant $σ_{grav} = 1$	Constant-weight specialization; general component recovery pending.
$K_{8}$ convolution	$H_{1, α} = \partial_{b^{α}} B$	Derived here; nonconstant-weight reduction is a different operation.
Advanced root	$F = E_{m}^{A} f$ with the stated operator and domain	Derived here; predecessor root identification not established.
Complete marked insertion	The seven rows below are its coefficient kernel	Derived here; no inherited observable identity claimed.

Nearby in this section

section: Specialization, not reproduction