Manuscript Em05-A@1 · Em05-A-v1.tex · theorem · 9cac0def

Theorem: Diagnostic separation

Interpretation and mathematical conclusion · lines 1257–1298 · proof included or linked

Em05-A@1#thm:release

Back to manuscript

For the declared extraction and output-noise experiments:

  1. The signed extraction map and its complete complement are physical for every .

  2. Occupation, coherence, purity, Bell-input spectra, reference mutual information, and reference negativity obey the proved identities.

  3. The specified decoder has error , Bell fidelity , worst-case target overlap , and decoded concurrence .

  4. Exact recovery is impossible at , but the specified decoder is not presumed optimal there. Optimal recovery errors at are .

  5. Population-preserving dephasing retains an additional complete environment. At full transfer its optimal recovery error is , although the Bell-input accessible marginal is independent of .

  6. Accessible marginal purity, occupation delivery, and even knowledge of the complete accessible marginal for a single Bell-input experiment do not replace a referenced channel-recovery criterion.

These are finite-channel information-flow results. They do not establish black-hole evaporation, a gravitational Page curve, or a solution to the black-hole information paradox.

Proof. Theorem thm:channels proves (i). Theorem thm:marginals, Theorem thm:information, and Proposition prop:rawneg prove (ii). Theorem thm:specified proves (iii). Proposition prop:optimal proves (iv). Proposition prop:noisy and Theorem thm:fullNoise prove (v). The purity endpoints and Corollary cor:separation prove (vi). None of the hypotheses specifies a gravitational identification.

Nearby in this section