Manuscript En02-A@1 · En02-A-v1.tex · lemma · bb1319d5

Lemma: Born inhabitation

Finite operational strategies and explicit requirements › The five capacity-restricted requirements · lines 428–470 · proof included or linked

En02-A@1#lem:born-inhabitation

Back to manuscript

The strategy

belongs to for every .

Proof. Normalization follows from . Disjoint destructive components commute after identifying surviving factors, proving composability. Nullity and continuity follow directly from squared norms.

For a finite local program, compose allocation isometries, unitaries, and destructive measurement bras along each history. Backward induction on the outcome tree gives a complete family of path maps: . For bipartite histories the maps factor as . Summing over the remote histories gives

This proves the specified no-signaling requirement.

For records write . A continuation history , with path map , has joint weight in the direct program. The copied program has pre-readout vector

and record readout gives the same weight. Summing histories proves record equality. All compared paths obey the capacity restriction.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • unlabeled · line 431

  • unlabeled · line 451

  • unlabeled · line 464

Nearby in this section