Manuscript En04-A@1 · En04-A.tex · proposition · bab77211
Proposition: Non-Cliffordness is neither necessary nor sufficient
Stabilizer structure and why the proposed implication fails › Clifford leakage and non-Clifford nonresponse · lines 818–864 · proof included or linked
En04-A@1#prop:independence
There is a Clifford coherent program with
There is a non-Clifford coherent program with
Proof. For the first example, allocate in and apply , returning the original carrier as . Then
and both marginals are computational dephasing
The two residual basis outputs are orthogonal, giving . The replacement gives the matching upper bound: for every referenced input the two diagonal reference blocks multiply output differences of trace norm one. Thus the half-diamond distance is at most .
The inputs and have identical radiation outputs. A decoder of error therefore satisfies . The identity decoder has error , proving the recovery formula.
For the second example, let
The complement is , and recovers exactly. The gate is non-Clifford because , which is not a Pauli. For input , the output has Bloch components , outside the convex hull of the six Pauli eigenstates.
Displayed formulas in this passage
unlabeled · line 821
unlabeled · line 825
unlabeled · line 834
unlabeled · line 838
unlabeled · line 854