Conclusion

The generic implication from non-Clifford or bipartite non-local magic to a nonconstant complete residual is false. The converse implication is false as well. The exact invariant governing whole-code radiation recovery is constancy of the complete complementary channel.

A specified non-Clifford deformation can produce residual response: the controlled-rotation construction proves this with exact distances, and the first-order observable theorem supplies a general sufficient condition. The coupling witness, not the resource label alone, establishes the conclusion.

Residual response is not geometric backreaction. A geometric interpretation needs a justified subsystem or observable dictionary, a matter-input identification, and same-model physical dynamics. The supplied plan cannot replace these hypotheses by terminology.

Enter remains destructive readout after a finite carrier exists. It is not unitary evolution, quantum decoding, or physical deletion. Complete unitary apparatus outputs retain the information omitted from the observer's classical interface.

The completed mathematical release consists of the local channel theorems, the Clifford test, the magic counterexamples, the responding family, the quantitative witness, the control accounting, and the endpoint and recurrence distinctions. No physical field-to-memory receiver, metric response law, gravitational endpoint, or admitted analytic quantum coefficient is established.