Manuscript En04-A@1 · En04-A.tex · theorem · bab77211
Theorem: Exact recovery, constancy, and observable compression
Preservation, exact recovery, and response witnesses · lines 447–537 · proof included or linked
En04-A@1#thm:exact, En04-A@1#eq:normalform, En04-A@1#eq:decoder
For , the following are equivalent:
one CPTP decoder on exactly recovers the entire code;
for one residual state ;
for every code matrix unit ,
for every bounded residual observable ,
Here
When these conditions hold, there exist a Hilbert space , a state , and an isometry such that
An exact complete decoder is
Proof. Linearity and expansion of the Bell projector give equivalence of (ii)–(iv). Duality gives
Thus (ii) implies (v). Conversely, in (v), evaluate at to identify the scalar as . Since bounded observables separate trace-class operators, , proving (ii).
Assume (ii), and diagonalize
The support condition permits the expansion
Constancy on every matrix unit gives
Consequently is an isometry, and gives (eq:normalform). Formula (eq:decoder) is CPTP and recovers every matrix unit.
Conversely, dilate an exact decoder by an isometry . Stinespring dilation is the standard channel structure theorem Watrous,KSW. The map has
because the decoded marginal is pure. Exact recovery of forces . All coincide. Tracing the decoded register and therefore gives (iii).
Displayed formulas in this passage
En04-A@1#eq:normalform · line 477
En04-A@1#eq:decoder · line 482
unlabeled · line 454
unlabeled · line 458
unlabeled · line 462
unlabeled · line 468
unlabeled · line 493
unlabeled · line 503
unlabeled · line 508
unlabeled · line 515
unlabeled · line 530
Nearby in this section
- theorem: Theorem: Complete preservation and global restore
- section: Preservation, exact recovery, and response witnesses
- section: Preservation, exact recovery, and response witnesses
- corollary: Corollary: The precise no-hiding conclusion
- lemma: Lemma: Constancy and quantitative witnesses
- remark: Remark: Response does not locate the whole diary