Manuscript En04-A@1 · En04-A.tex · theorem · bab77211

Theorem: Exact recovery, constancy, and observable compression

Preservation, exact recovery, and response witnesses · lines 447–537 · proof included or linked

En04-A@1#thm:exact, En04-A@1#eq:normalform, En04-A@1#eq:decoder

Back to manuscript

For , the following are equivalent:

  1. one CPTP decoder on exactly recovers the entire code;

  2. for one residual state ;

  3. for every code matrix unit ,

  4. for every bounded residual observable ,

Here

When these conditions hold, there exist a Hilbert space , a state , and an isometry such that

An exact complete decoder is

Proof. Linearity and expansion of the Bell projector give equivalence of (ii)–(iv). Duality gives

Thus (ii) implies (v). Conversely, in (v), evaluate at to identify the scalar as . Since bounded observables separate trace-class operators, , proving (ii).

Assume (ii), and diagonalize

The support condition permits the expansion

Constancy on every matrix unit gives

Consequently is an isometry, and gives (eq:normalform). Formula (eq:decoder) is CPTP and recovers every matrix unit.

Conversely, dilate an exact decoder by an isometry . Stinespring dilation is the standard channel structure theorem Watrous,KSW. The map has

because the decoded marginal is pure. Exact recovery of forces . All coincide. Tracing the decoded register and therefore gives (iii).

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • En04-A@1#eq:normalform · line 477

  • En04-A@1#eq:decoder · line 482

  • unlabeled · line 454

  • unlabeled · line 458

  • unlabeled · line 462

  • unlabeled · line 468

  • unlabeled · line 493

  • unlabeled · line 503

  • unlabeled · line 508

  • unlabeled · line 515

  • unlabeled · line 530

Nearby in this section