Manuscript En04-A@1 · En04-A.tex · theorem · bab77211
Theorem: Exact response and recovery for the deformation
A genuine Clifford criterion and a responding deformation › An exact non-Clifford responding program · lines 1113–1205 · proof included or linked
En04-A@1#thm:rotation, En04-A@1#eq:rotationexact
For (eq:rotationisometry),
and
The exact quantities are
For , the unitary is non-Clifford and its output on the stabilizer input has positive bipartite non-local magic across . At , the unitary is Clifford but the complement is still nonconstant.
Proof. Partial traces of the two columns in (eq:rotationisometry) give the displayed channels. The residual pure states have overlap , hence trace distance . Lemma lem:witness gives the lower bound .
Let
Each basis output has distance from . For an arbitrary referenced input, the output difference is
where the diagonal reference blocks are positive and . The trace norm is therefore at most . This proves the matching half-diamond upper bound.
The radiation channel has
The identity decoder has error , using an upper triangle bound and the orthogonal Bell outputs of and . For any decoder of error , the ideal outputs of and have distance one, while their channel outputs have distance . Contraction and the triangle inequality give . This proves the recovery formula.
For input , the complete output is
Its radiation reduction has eigenvalues and . For , these are nonzero and unequal. Lemma lem:flat shows that the state is not locally equivalent to a stabilizer state. In particular, cannot be Clifford, because it maps a stabilizer input to a nonstabilizer output.
At , , and
where acts first. This is Clifford. On the allocated residual, its code isometry is the copying isometry of Proposition prop:independence.
Displayed formulas in this passage
En04-A@1#eq:rotationexact · line 1132
unlabeled · line 1116
unlabeled · line 1126
unlabeled · line 1156
unlabeled · line 1163
unlabeled · line 1172
unlabeled · line 1184
unlabeled · line 1199