Manuscript En05-C@1 · En05-C.tex · theorem · aa213ea6

Theorem: Exact compatible operational refinement

An exact gauge subdivision limit › States, instruments, and matched devices · lines 2151–2197 · proof included or linked

En05-C@1#thm:operationalrefinement, En05-C@1#eq:exactrefinement

Back to manuscript

Let be a specified complete device, or a fixed finite complete recorded instrument, built from the gauge-preserving realizations above. Put

Then:

  1. every is UCP and every is a state;

  2. all complete outcome laws are identical at every scale;

  3. the logical channel equality is exact at every independent reference size;

  4. compatible regional containments are preserved;

  5. matched pairs retain the same unchanged device actions, central data, resources, and report designations;

  6. finite compositions and complete recorded continuations are preserved exactly.

The electric readout in Example ex:localread and closed-cycle unitaries generated by give nonconstant instances.

Proof. Conjugation by a -isomorphism preserves complete positivity, unitality, and states. For every output observable,

The same identity holds componentwise for recorded instruments and after matrix amplification, proving (ii)–(iii).

Supported invariant realizations refine by the construction in Lemma lem:nestedregions. Their physical channels are (eq:exactrefinement), so containment passes under the same identifications. Choose the refinements once for a matched pair; unchanged realizations and resources remain common. Unitary conjugation respects composition and finite direct sums, giving (v)–(vi). The specified examples depend nontrivially on physical inputs.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • En05-C@1#eq:exactrefinement · line 2156

  • unlabeled · line 2182

Nearby in this section