Manuscript En06-B@1 · En06-B.tex · theorem · ee886ae8

Theorem: Exact state–instrument pairing

Operational–algebraic compatibility · lines 1921–1977 · proof included or linked

En06-B@1#thm:pairing, En06-B@1#eq:pairing, En06-B@1#eq:selectivepairing

Back to manuscript

For every logical input state ,

More generally, for every observable on the retained quantum and setting outputs,

The same identities hold at every sufficiently fine scale under the instrument and observable comparison maps.

The effects are products of commuting represented local pointer projections in the two measurement algebras.

Proof. Proposition prop:dilation identifies the operational channel with the partial trace of . The defining property of partial trace and cyclicity of trace give (eq:pairing) and (eq:selectivepairing).

Each single-wing pointer projection pulls back into its wing algebra. These two algebras commute by Theorem thm:microcausality. Their product is (eq:reporteffects).

At scale , insert the physical blank state in the remaining factors. Lemma lem:obscomparison gives

The exact channel identity (eq:exactBelllimit) and exact observable comparison (eq:exactobservablelimit) then reproduce the same pairings.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • En06-B@1#eq:pairing · line 1924

  • En06-B@1#eq:selectivepairing · line 1938

  • unlabeled · line 1970

Nearby in this section