Manuscript En06-B@1 · En06-B.tex · theorem · ee886ae8
Theorem: Exact state–instrument pairing
Operational–algebraic compatibility · lines 1921–1977 · proof included or linked
En06-B@1#thm:pairing, En06-B@1#eq:pairing, En06-B@1#eq:selectivepairing
For every logical input state ,
More generally, for every observable on the retained quantum and setting outputs,
The same identities hold at every sufficiently fine scale under the instrument and observable comparison maps.
The effects are products of commuting represented local pointer projections in the two measurement algebras.
Proof. Proposition prop:dilation identifies the operational channel with the partial trace of . The defining property of partial trace and cyclicity of trace give (eq:pairing) and (eq:selectivepairing).
Each single-wing pointer projection pulls back into its wing algebra. These two algebras commute by Theorem thm:microcausality. Their product is (eq:reporteffects).
At scale , insert the physical blank state in the remaining factors. Lemma lem:obscomparison gives
The exact channel identity (eq:exactBelllimit) and exact observable comparison (eq:exactobservablelimit) then reproduce the same pairings.
Displayed formulas in this passage
En06-B@1#eq:pairing · line 1924
En06-B@1#eq:selectivepairing · line 1938
unlabeled · line 1970