Release boundary and conclusions

The physical and documentary boundaries are separate from that mathematical collection:

• No new Landauer bound is derived. No optimal heat, work, or cyclic reset cost is determined for $\mathsf{Enter}$, $\mathsf{Drop}$, or the Hawk04-B Hamiltonian.

• No thermodynamic advantage is claimed for residual, success-branch, or failure-branch reuse.

• No area law, Ryu–Takayanagi relation, entanglement first law, island, Page curve, or bulk–boundary dictionary is constructed.

• No positive noncommuting recovery window, physical field-to-memory receiver, quantum-gravity unitarity theorem, or gravitational evaporation endpoint is established.

• Corollary cor:gravity remains conditional on all four same-model hypotheses.

• No exact finite-gate compilation, numerical execution, or resource-optimal implementation is asserted.

{{0.93} Unchanged inherited statuses.

No interacting gravitational quantum coefficient ${R_1}^{(1)}$ is admitted by this note. No missing characteristic product is defined. XV-B's admission-dependent exit is not opened. XVI-N's separate universal or prepared-source obligations are not discharged. O.1 remains NOT_CLOSED.

These are scoped documentary non-transfer statements, not universal nonexistence theorems. }

Complete preservation concerns the complete output. Recovery concerns declared access. Readout concerns a specified record. Thermodynamic erasure concerns a physical implementation and its resource restoration. Holographic reconstruction concerns additional geometric and dynamical identifications.

The residual ledger keeps these questions from being answered by changing the meaning of “recycle bin.”