Manuscript En08-B@1 · En08-B.tex · section · 23cac52a
Non-transfer statements
Limit selection and comparison boundaries › Non-transfer statements · lines 1489–1531
No predecessor proof transfer. The geometric, support, transport, and error arguments needed for Theorem thm:main are proved locally. En05-B and En06-B are documentary comparisons CheungEn05B,CheungEn06B. Their networks are not identified with the present route family.
No universal network realization. The positive construction transports one fixed-dimensional payload along one target-dependent route. It does not establish simultaneous routing, universal adaptive experiment matching, or a target-independent autonomous schedule.
No native incidence realization. No conical packet, three-to-six incidence structure, affine-conical certificate, source-dependent lapse, or residual-matter instrument is used. The finite support and recovery comparisons in VIII-A and VIII-C do not identify their geometric models with this Euclidean lattice CheungVIIIA,CheungVIIIC.
No derived relativity or gravity. No spatial metric, numerical speed, observer-invariant speed, Lorentz action on experiments, field regulator limit, Einstein equation, or quantum-gravitational coefficient is derived. The time parameter is external.
No catalogue premise. The supplied OpenAI catalogue descriptions, including Family 271, are not mathematical inputs to any argument here. No catalogue claim is verified or transferred.
No external obligation is discharged. The result makes no admission into an inherited characteristic map and does not discharge the separate obligations designated O.1, XV-B, XVI-N, or the series Route B. Those designations refer to external manuscript projects, not to additional conclusions of this theorem.