Conclusion and verification boundary

The construction has the explicit chain

Every arrow has a declared domain and output. The second arrow consumes the measured names. The third is classical post-processing and is not part of the readout primitive.

The philosophical discipline is therefore realized rather than merely repeated:

• complete instrument equality is proved, not inferred from agreement on one preparation;

• the classical record and conditional residual are kept separate;

• an estimator is provided with a sensitivity and shot ledger;

• omitted physical parameters are not recovered by relabeling finite outputs;

• thermodynamic and geometric conclusions are withheld because their interfaces have not been constructed.

This is a finite analog with an estimation contract. It is not a solution of the Galactic positron problem. Increasing the number of qubits or combining this subroutine with a classical transport code would require a new declared interface and would not automatically strengthen the conclusions proved here.

boundary. The source uses standard pdfLaTeX packages and contains its bibliography internally. The algebraic and statistical arguments are supplied in the document. No successful pdfLaTeX execution, proof-assistant verification, experimental implementation, numerical benchmark, hardware compilation, independent referee review, or journal acceptance of this manuscript is asserted.