Manuscript En10-B@1 · En10-B.tex · section · a1105bad
Acquisition, derivation, and identification are different
The question, its philosophical background, and necessary corrections › Acquisition, derivation, and identification are different · lines 123–156
En10-A proves an estimation contract on a declared finite interface. Its unknown source weight is a parameter of a specified preparation family. That result does not by itself construct a positron injection apparatus or identify its parameter with a physical source.
The present question has three layers: \[
specified finite dynamics
derived finite record channel,
physical source and apparatus
validated acquisition channel,
acquired records
inference about a named physical observable.
The first arrow can be proved from a finite Hamiltonian. The second requires additional physical data and comparison certificates. The third requires identifiability, calibration, and a statistical contract.
The observational context is positron-source inference, not a new Galactic analysis. Actual 511\,keV analyses use spatial and spectral component models and instrumental-background modelling Siegert2016. These structures are absent from the graph constructed below.