Manuscript En10-B@1 · En10-B.tex · section · a1105bad

An explicit complete-law ambiguity

Competing explanations and complete-record discrimination › An explicit complete-law ambiguity · lines 1075–1092

En10-B@1#eq:reduced-parameters, En10-B@1#eq:reduced-law

Put

r = u + θ (1 - 2 u), c = u - v .

Equation (eq:likelihood) becomes

p_{00} = r - h c, p_{10} = γ (1 - r) + h c, p_{01} = h c, p_{11} = h (1 - r - c) .

Thus at fixed $γ$ the complete record depends only on $r, c$ , not separately on $θ, u, v$ .

Displayed formulas in this passage

En10-B@1#eq:reduced-parameters · line 1078
$r = u + θ (1 - 2 u), c = u - v .$
En10-B@1#eq:reduced-law · line 1083
$p_{00} = r - h c, p_{10} = γ (1 - r) + h c, p_{01} = h c, p_{11} = h (1 - r - c) .$