Manuscript En10-B@1 · En10-B.tex · theorem · a1105bad

Theorem: Calibrated finite-model source-weight inference

Calibration and complete-record finite-shot inference › The calibrated estimation theorem · lines 857–937 · proof included or linked

En10-B@1#thm:calibrated, En10-B@1#eq:radius, En10-B@1#eq:source-coverage, En10-B@1#eq:shot-budget

Back to manuscript

Under Assumption ass:statistics, for with , define

Then, uniformly over the promised source and calibration family,

Thus

is a confidence interval with that coverage.

For , a sufficient finite shot budget is

This is a certificate for the named model parameter, not a Galactic-source identification.

Proof. Conditional on the calibration record, the bounded independent scores obey

For completeness, a bounded variable has

Indeed the second derivative of its log moment-generating function is the variance of a tilted law on , at most . Integration from zero proves the bound. Independence, exponential Markov inequalities, and optimization in give the stated two-sided concentration bound. This is the bounded-variable form of Hoeffding's inequality Hoeffding1963.

On , the law allowance gives

Lemma lem:calibration then gives, on the concentration event,

Projection onto cannot increase distance from , so division by proves the radius. The bound permits its cap at one. Integrating the conditional statistical failure probability and adding proves (eq:source-coverage). Rearranging the radius requirement proves (eq:shot-budget).

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • En10-B@1#eq:radius · line 861

  • En10-B@1#eq:source-coverage · line 869

  • En10-B@1#eq:shot-budget · line 882

  • unlabeled · line 875

  • unlabeled · line 898

  • unlabeled · line 905

  • unlabeled · line 920

  • unlabeled · line 926

Nearby in this section