Manuscript En10-B@1 · En10-B.tex · theorem · a1105bad

Theorem: Complete-record compatibility and discrimination

Competing explanations and complete-record discrimination › Predeclared model families · lines 998–1059 · proof included or linked

En10-B@1#thm:competition, En10-B@1#eq:compatibility-coverage, En10-B@1#eq:gap, En10-B@1#eq:separation-condition, En10-B@1#eq:discrimination-shots

Back to manuscript

Suppose the conditional fixed-shot contract holds for a true member , with

on . Then

For two promised families, define the complete-record separation

If

the rule that reports the uniquely compatible family, and otherwise reports “inconclusive”, reports the true family with probability at least , uniformly on either promise class.

One conservative sufficient sample size is

Proof. For each coordinate indicator, conditional Hoeffding gives failure probability at most . A union bound yields simultaneous deviation at most from the average actual law. Total variation at most bounds every coordinate bias by . This proves (eq:compatibility-coverage) after calibration failure is added.

On that simultaneous event, the true parameter is compatible. If a parameter of the other family were also compatible, the triangle inequality would give

contradicting (eq:separation-condition). Thus exactly the true family is compatible. The conservative sample bound gives , and therefore a strict separation.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • En10-B@1#eq:compatibility-coverage · line 1006

  • En10-B@1#eq:gap · line 1012

  • En10-B@1#eq:separation-condition · line 1018

  • En10-B@1#eq:discrimination-shots · line 1029

  • unlabeled · line 1002

  • unlabeled · line 1051

Nearby in this section