Manuscript Hawk02-C@2 · Hawk02-C.tex · lemma · bb332d66
Lemma: An erasure isometry and its exact errors
Conventions and common-space comparison · lines 449–522 · proof included or linked
Hawk02-C@2#lem:erasure, Hawk02-C@2#eq:erasureerrors
Let and be isometries whose ranges are orthogonal to fixed unit vectors and . For , define
Its accessible channel and complement are
and
An optimal decoder and residual comparison state are
At a zero-weight endpoint, the unused embedding need not be defined.
Proof. Orthogonality gives the two partial traces. The decoder is normal, completely positive, and trace preserving, and
Lemma lem:replacement gives error .
For any decoder on a Bell input, the successful branch contributes Bell overlap at most . The erased branch contributes exactly . The Bell test proves recovery optimality.
For the stated residual state,
which gives the leakage upper bound.
For any alternative , apply a CPTP map to the residual that keeps the range as a logical sector and maps its orthogonal complement to a single failure flag. Let be the candidate state's weight in the logical sector. On the Bell input, the effect equal to the logical Bell projector and zero on the failure sector has expectation difference
The effect equal to that Bell projector plus the entire failure sector has expectation difference
If , the first is at least . If , the second is at least . Contractivity proves the lower bound for every . Endpoints follow from the constant or isometric channels.
Displayed formulas in this passage
Hawk02-C@2#eq:erasureerrors · line 466
unlabeled · line 454
unlabeled · line 459
unlabeled · line 462
unlabeled · line 471
unlabeled · line 475
unlabeled · line 486
unlabeled · line 497
unlabeled · line 510
unlabeled · line 515
Nearby in this section
- section: Conventions and common-space comparison
- definition: Definition: Complete-output assignment
- section: Conventions and common-space comparison
- theorem: Theorem: Identified complete-isometry comparison
- section: Conventions and common-space comparison
- lemma: Lemma: Identity versus replacement
- section: Conventions and common-space comparison