Manuscript Hawk02-D@1 · Hawk02-D.tex · section · e6e4b72f
Release statement and unresolved evaporation target
Release statement and unresolved evaporation target · lines 1960–2025
{}1.15
| Target | Status in this source |
|---|---|
| Actual microscopic recovery | Proved for the declared quadratic fermionic model. |
| Complete microscopic residual bound | Proved for that model, including source and uncollected modes. |
| Autonomous microscopic endpoint | Proved through complete scattering for that model. |
| Finite-bath reference-stable approximation | Proved quantitatively for the benchmark; a locality-to-channel conversion is supplied for a fixed finite interacting source. |
| Small residual bound for interacting SYK | Not established. |
| Physical infalling diary and radiation receiver | Not constructed. |
| Evaporating gravitational geometry and backreaction | Not constructed. |
| Complete gravitational evaporation | Not established. |
| Solution of physical black-hole evaporation | Not claimed. |
. The benchmark shows how a rigorous successor can discharge actual recovery, complete microscopic information accounting, and an endpoint in one independently specified autonomous model. It also shows why finite-regulator recurrence and omitted residual sectors cannot be ignored.
The proposed interacting SYK gravitational successor still requires a quantitatively small bound for (eq:syk-target) inside a common regime of controlled gravitational preparation, radiation access, and backreaction. The supplied excerpts do not discharge that requirement. A submission claiming otherwise would turn a research obligation into an unsupported theorem.
and submission boundary. All proofs above are analytical arguments on the printed model. No numerical diamond-norm optimization, continuum simulation, machine proof checking, or pdfLaTeX execution is asserted. The Cheung references are version-qualified source comparisons. Responsible author metadata, archival access to cited unpublished manuscripts, compilation, and independent technical review should be completed before submission.