Manuscript Hawk02-D@1 · Hawk02-D.tex · theorem · e6e4b72f

Theorem: Dynamical recovery with the complete residual retained

Actual complete-residual recovery · lines 801–889 · proof included or linked

Hawk02-D@1#thm:main, Hawk02-D@1#eq:main-bound, Hawk02-D@1#eq:complete-decoder, Hawk02-D@1#eq:simple-beta

Back to manuscript

For the Hamiltonian, preparation, code, and access prescription of Section sec:model,

When , a complete decoder attaining the recovery upper bound is

Moreover,

No small-leakage hypothesis is imposed: the right-hand side is calculated from the autonomous Hamiltonian.

Proof. Suppose first that . The ideal complete code isometry is

For each label, the one-particle overlap between its actual evolved vector and its ideal collected vector is . Second quantization therefore gives, on source Fock space,

where the collected modes are included in the full output space and denotes input source particle number. Consequently,

This operator is positive and self-adjoint. Hence

The first term of (eq:complete-decoder) is completely positive. The second is a positive-effect measurement followed by state preparation, and is completely positive. Their traces add to , so the decoder is CPTP. It exactly decodes .

Lemma lem:isometry and postprocessing contraction give the recovery bound. The ideal complementary channel is , so the same lemma gives the complete residual bound.

All half-diamond distances between channels are at most one. If , use this trivial bound and any complete decoder.

Finally,

where the second inequality is Bernoulli's inequality for the integer . This proves (eq:simple-beta).

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • Hawk02-D@1#eq:main-bound · line 805

  • Hawk02-D@1#eq:complete-decoder · line 813

  • Hawk02-D@1#eq:simple-beta · line 822

  • unlabeled · line 858

  • unlabeled · line 833

  • unlabeled · line 841

  • unlabeled · line 850

  • unlabeled · line 884

Nearby in this section