Manuscript Hawk02-D@1 · Hawk02-D.tex · theorem · e6e4b72f
Theorem: Dynamical recovery with the complete residual retained
Actual complete-residual recovery · lines 801–889 · proof included or linked
Hawk02-D@1#thm:main, Hawk02-D@1#eq:main-bound, Hawk02-D@1#eq:complete-decoder, Hawk02-D@1#eq:simple-beta
For the Hamiltonian, preparation, code, and access prescription of Section sec:model,
When , a complete decoder attaining the recovery upper bound is
Moreover,
No small-leakage hypothesis is imposed: the right-hand side is calculated from the autonomous Hamiltonian.
Proof. Suppose first that . The ideal complete code isometry is
For each label, the one-particle overlap between its actual evolved vector and its ideal collected vector is . Second quantization therefore gives, on source Fock space,
where the collected modes are included in the full output space and denotes input source particle number. Consequently,
This operator is positive and self-adjoint. Hence
The first term of (eq:complete-decoder) is completely positive. The second is a positive-effect measurement followed by state preparation, and is completely positive. Their traces add to , so the decoder is CPTP. It exactly decodes .
Lemma lem:isometry and postprocessing contraction give the recovery bound. The ideal complementary channel is , so the same lemma gives the complete residual bound.
All half-diamond distances between channels are at most one. If , use this trivial bound and any complete decoder.
Finally,
where the second inequality is Bernoulli's inequality for the integer . This proves (eq:simple-beta).
Displayed formulas in this passage
Hawk02-D@1#eq:main-bound · line 805
Hawk02-D@1#eq:complete-decoder · line 813
Hawk02-D@1#eq:simple-beta · line 822
unlabeled · line 858
unlabeled · line 833
unlabeled · line 841
unlabeled · line 850
unlabeled · line 884