Manuscript Hawk03-A@1 · Hawk03-A.tex · theorem · 9a109c12
Theorem: Conditional one-model certification
Comparison errors and a conditional physical certificate · lines 1372–1422 · proof included or linked
Hawk03-A@1#thm:physical, Hawk03-A@1#eq:physicalrec, Hawk03-A@1#eq:physicalleak, Hawk03-A@1#eq:physicalfall
Under Assumption ass:physical,
The channel bounds preserve arbitrary external references. If complete history comparisons are used, the corresponding history-record bound holds with their sequential budgets. For the exact benchmark of Section sec:model, .
These conclusions certify only the declared recovery and infalling experiments. Physical horizon regularity additionally depends on the independently proved content of (H5)–(H6).
Proof. Trace the full-output comparison over and apply the same comparison decoder. Contractivity and the triangle inequality give (eq:physicalrec), taking an arbitrarily near-optimal comparison decoder if necessary.
Trace instead over and compare to an arbitrarily near-optimal replacement channel for the comparison complement. This gives (eq:physicalleak).
For the instrument outputs, insert between and . Channel contractivity and the instrument comparison bound the first two differences by and . Reading only the classical record cannot enlarge the distance. Add the stated regular-reference allowance .
All comparisons were in diamond norm, so the proof holds with tensored throughout. The history assertion follows from Lemma lem:telescoping. The exact benchmark values follow from Theorem thm:modelchannels. Nothing in this argument constructs the independent physical hypotheses (H5)–(H6).
Displayed formulas in this passage
Hawk03-A@1#eq:physicalrec · line 1375
Hawk03-A@1#eq:physicalleak · line 1375
Hawk03-A@1#eq:physicalfall · line 1375
Nearby in this section
- section: Comparison errors and a conditional physical certificate
- lemma: Lemma: Sequential reference-stable comparison
- section: Comparison errors and a conditional physical certificate
- lemma: Lemma: Isometric full-output comparison
- lemma: Lemma: Finite POVM comparison
- remark: Remark: Effect and instrument budgets remain different
- assumption: Assumption: One-model physical bridge package
- section: Comparison errors and a conditional physical certificate