Manuscript I-B-VP-2@1 · I-B-VP-2-v1.tex · proposition · f4bd2b11
Proposition: Point splitting still requires subtraction
Products, restrictions, and the one-point companions › The diagonal is different · lines 1613–1642 · proof included or linked
I-B-VP-2@1#prop:diagonal
The unrenormalized diagonal pullback of fails the ordinary wavefront criterion. In contrast, the local remainder in (eq:localHadamard) has well-defined diagonal jets of every finite order. Consequently the Wick square, stress tensor, and current prescriptions of the regular-part companions remain well-defined at every point of .
Proof. The diagonal wavefront contains
These covectors are normal to the diagonal embedding. Thus one cannot justify the unrenormalized pullback by the ordinary criterion. The subtracted remainder is smooth in a neighbourhood of each regular diagonal point, so all its required local diagonal derivatives exist.
The apex front cannot meet the spacetime diagonal: at , . The additional global fronts therefore do not alter this local subtraction argument.
Displayed formulas in this passage
unlabeled · line 1626