Manuscript I-B-VP-2@1 · I-B-VP-2-v1.tex · section · f4bd2b11
Comparison with the image–diffraction representation
The diffracted coefficient and its nonvanishing criterion › Comparison with the image–diffraction representation · lines 1165–1231
I-B-VP-2@1#eq:contourW
For orientation and normalization, define
The notation here uses , rather than the developing angle , as its second argument.
The Bessel angular identity gives, off the transition angles,
One obtains this formula by applying the heat-kernel angular summation before integrating the Euclidean time heat factor, and then continuing its total kernel. It is the covariance counterpart of the Sommerfeld–Carslaw–Dowker formulas in I-B-G and I-B-VP CheungIBG,CheungIBVP. At transition angles the joint distribution, not separate pointwise sector values, is the object.
The coefficient in (eq:A) can be checked without assigning a value to a divergent angular series:
Its transition-free limit is therefore
Since
the endpoint model
recovers (eq:diffcoefficient). The full wavefront proof at the angular transition was instead given by the reduced-variable argument of Proposition prop:upper; this endpoint check is not used to differentiate a singular moving image sector.
Displayed formulas in this passage
I-B-VP-2@1#eq:contourW · line 1181
unlabeled · line 1168
unlabeled · line 1171
unlabeled · line 1205
unlabeled · line 1212
unlabeled · line 1216
unlabeled · line 1221