Manuscript I@2 · I.tex · proposition · 85631fa7
Proposition: Adaptive equality from complete process equality
After Enter: records, instruments, decoders, and cutoffs › Complete process data: the direction of implication · lines 2356–2390 · proof included or linked
I@2#prop:process
Consider two finite adaptive models on identified accessible spaces. Suppose their initial accessible states agree and, after every permitted setting and history, their interval channels and complete selective instruments agree. Then all permitted adaptive record laws agree, including with an untouched reference. For an equal-prior binary randomized test, the type-I and type-II errors satisfy
For arbitrary record laws ,
Proof. Induction through the finite experiment tree gives equality of every unnormalized accessible conditional state. Taking its trace gives equality of history weights and hence record laws. Tensoring the assumed map identities with the reference identity gives the same induction with a reference.
If is the probability of deciding for model , then
The difference of expectations has magnitude at most total variation.
Displayed formulas in this passage
unlabeled · line 2366
unlabeled · line 2370
unlabeled · line 2384