Manuscript I@2 · I.tex · section · 85631fa7
The finite two-laboratory calculation
Context refinement and the Frauchiger–Renner example › The finite two-laboratory calculation · lines 2578–2659
Take
and define
The fail vectors use plus signs.
Let
The corresponding zero-probability events give
Indeed,
However,
The necessary contexts therefore have no common sharp refinement. In the outer context measuring both interference bases,
Transporting the three implications into one outer classical chain is not justified by the stated refinement discipline.
This is an observational-context obstruction. It is not a theorem that linear ownership alone rejects all cross-observer inference. Sequential operations on the same laboratory can be well typed and can disturb later tests.
No interior observable algebra or gravitational dynamics is specified here. The calculation consequently establishes no claim about smooth horizons or firewalls. This boundary agrees with the explicit finite-mode non-claims of Em03-C CheungEm03C; the physical firewall question has a different hypothesis package AMPS.
An internal syntax for observer judgments, certificates, and allowed transports remains P3 below.
Displayed formulas in this passage
unlabeled · line 2581
unlabeled · line 2590
unlabeled · line 2600
unlabeled · line 2612
unlabeled · line 2620
unlabeled · line 2629
unlabeled · line 2636