Manuscript IX-B@2 · IX-B-v2.tex · remark · 8ce915d6
Remark: Subtraction does not modify the old product by fiat
Regularized association and the admitted partial coefficient · lines 1177–1191
IX-B@2#rem:subtraction
VII-C's counterterm discussion distinguishes a numerical
subtraction from an extension preserving the old Wick product.
Subtracting from the positive-cutoff coefficients changes products
already fixed in . Assigning a subtracted value only at
the sharp kernel does not restore sequential continuity of the
unsubtracted coefficient map
VIIC (thm:coefficient; Section “Counterterms and the scope
of the conclusion').
VII-D explicitly retains this obstruction
VIID (Section “Scope audit').
Accordingly, the finite part here is not a counterterm inserted
inside the unchanged old polynomial product.