Manuscript IX-C-ST@1 · IX-C-ST.tex · lemma · 892f50c4
Lemma: A nonzero surface coefficient is not microcausal
Boundary-charge separation in the regular chart · lines 1951–1982 · proof included or linked
IX-C-ST@1#lem:surfaceWF
If is smooth near and , then has a nonzero timelike wavefront covector.
Proof. In the fixed component convention the surface map in (eq:sharpadjoint) has
It is injective. Some component has local form
Choose compact localizers whose spatial pairing with is nonzero. Its Fourier transform along is a nonzero constant plus ; the latter bound follows by one-sided integration by parts on the smooth Heaviside amplitude. It is not rapidly decreasing. If no timelike wavefront covector occurred on that compact patch, a finite microlocal partition would imply rapid decay in a cone about the normal rays, a contradiction.
Displayed formulas in this passage
unlabeled · line 1961
unlabeled · line 1968
Nearby in this section
- section: Boundary-charge separation in the regular chart
- section: Boundary-charge separation in the regular chart
- lemma: Lemma: Microcausal linear kernels have zero charge
- proposition: Proposition: Zero-charge comparison classes
- lemma: Lemma: Local advanced trace formula
- lemma: Lemma: Nonzero sharp charge for every nonzero test
- section: Boundary-charge separation in the regular chart
- theorem: Theorem: Actual-space separation