Manuscript IX-D@3 · IX-D-v3.tex · proposition · 3ad4586e
Proposition: Conditional retarded-subtraction implication
D5: conditional subtraction on the declared free domain · lines 1407–1466 · proof included or linked
IX-D@3#prop:conditionalret
Under Assumption ass:future, define on
This is an actual tensor map, equivalently a bilinear map on its declared pairs, with admitted coefficients and zero classical term. It has the exact declared old unnormalized retarded overlaps and satisfies
Furthermore,
If both terms have a proved continuity property at the same strength on the same named domain, their difference has that property.
Proof. Both summands are linear maps on the actual tensor domain , so their difference respects every actual relation. Its coefficients belong to the vector space , with the required descendants, by admission of the two coefficient systems. Equal classical terms cancel.
On an excluded causal pair, (eq:causalfuture) makes the difference zero. On , the assumed old values and convention give the required old overlap.
For involution, use both order reversal and anti-time ordering:
The conjugate pair is in , by the stated domain stability.
Finally, subtraction is continuous in the coefficient topologies. Hence any common proved continuity statement is preserved.
Displayed formulas in this passage
unlabeled · line 1410
unlabeled · line 1418
unlabeled · line 1424
unlabeled · line 1445