Manuscript IX-D@3 · IX-D-v3.tex · proposition · 3ad4586e

Proposition: Conditional retarded-subtraction implication

D5: conditional subtraction on the declared free domain · lines 1407–1466 · proof included or linked

IX-D@3#prop:conditionalret

Back to manuscript

Under Assumption ass:future, define on

This is an actual tensor map, equivalently a bilinear map on its declared pairs, with admitted coefficients and zero classical term. It has the exact declared old unnormalized retarded overlaps and satisfies

Furthermore,

If both terms have a proved continuity property at the same strength on the same named domain, their difference has that property.

Proof. Both summands are linear maps on the actual tensor domain , so their difference respects every actual relation. Its coefficients belong to the vector space , with the required descendants, by admission of the two coefficient systems. Equal classical terms cancel.

On an excluded causal pair, (eq:causalfuture) makes the difference zero. On , the assumed old values and convention give the required old overlap.

For involution, use both order reversal and anti-time ordering:

The conjugate pair is in , by the stated domain stability.

Finally, subtraction is continuous in the coefficient topologies. Hence any common proved continuity statement is preserved.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • unlabeled · line 1410

  • unlabeled · line 1418

  • unlabeled · line 1424

  • unlabeled · line 1445

Nearby in this section