Manuscript IX-E-2@1 · IX-E-2.tex · section · e70d9077

Non-identification ledger and retained exclusions

Non-identification ledger and retained exclusions · lines 1471–1538

Source or object	Retained boundary
I and IV	Measurement semantics and represented records do not identify their outputs with the present kernel or commutator.
II and III	A finite contact-span certificate and classical descent are not sharp time-ordered existence theorems.
V	Its external $R_{1, 1}$ , oscillator coefficient, and Newton–wave cubic are not $K$ , a Cauchy-reflection triangle, or $T_{2}$ .
VI and VII-A	The compact-switch defect and restricted plateau intertwining statements do not construct the missing higher retarded products.
VII-C	Its conditional normal-topology obstruction remains in force under its joint hypotheses (E1)–(E4).
VII-D and triangle scalar	A numerical finite part and mollifier conversion are not a binary product or a binary contact classification.
VII-E/F and VIII-A–C	The certificates and token promise supply no map into the present actual tensor sector and no conical-current identification of $Q_{f, g}$ .
IX-Free-2	The released free product, descent, word coherence, and F9a are not time ordering and are not strengthened here.

All supplied free coefficients and the triangle parameter remain fixed. No contact is added to repair unequal prescribed values; no $u_{μ}^{ρ}$ is subtracted and renamed as a product. Removing a retained pair would change the target, not solve it.

G2 remains unopened. In particular, the inherited compact-switch witness

B_{f} [h + K ξ, ϕ] - B_{f} [h, ϕ] = - \int f X_{ξ} ϕ, g K ξ = 0,

retains its nonzero first-order dressing variation under its stated hypotheses. A correction beginning at second order cannot cancel a nonzero first-order coefficient while that prescription is retained.

No Feynman replacement, scaling-degree extension, normalized $R_{1}$ , $R_{2}$ , or $T_{3}$ is begun. No Einstein-equation or compilation claim is made. No repair of VII-C and no normal-topology algebra claim follows from the present calculation.

Displayed formulas in this passage

unlabeled · line 1523
$B_{f} [h + K ξ, ϕ] - B_{f} [h, ϕ] = - \int f X_{ξ} ϕ, g K ξ = 0,$