Retained boundaries and conclusion

Even a proved bridge leaves the actual-tensor relation test, coefficient and descendant admission, named fixed-support continuity, exact old overlap, contact equations, analytic involution, and conditional subtraction obligations unchanged. No replacement distribution is declared to be the sole remaining task.

V's external $R_{1,1}$ and Newton–wave cubic, VII-D's numerical finite part, VI's compact-switch defect, VII-A's plateau intertwiner, and the VII-E/F and VIII certificates remain non-identifications. No conical current or token is identified with the present commutator.

The free-sector descent and word coherence remain closed. F9a is not promoted to hypocontinuity. VII-C remains in force under its joint hypotheses (E1)–(E4). G2 remains unopened. No finite-part subtraction is renamed as a product, and no $R_1$, $R_2$, ${\mathsf{T}}_3$, or Feynman replacement is begun.

The central correction is mathematical rather than terminological: in the flat massless realization, actual initial support is generated by null spheres, and solid-ball interiors can be invisible to every configuration. Nevertheless, those spheres meet the initial ball of every observation pair in the closed commutator slab. They therefore prohibit the relevant ordering and prove the bridge.

For the inherited operator, the remaining burden is not another witness or kernel calculation. It is verification of the displayed boundary-trace certificate. Keeping that identification explicit is necessary to preserve the fixed target and the honest release status.