Manuscript Oai265-A@2 · Oai265-A.tex · section · c0a34a45

What was and was not inspected

Claim, source roles, and meaning of completion › What was and was not inspected · lines 190–217

Back to manuscript

The catalogue, the companion identification page, and published literature used below were consulted. Attempts to retrieve the full external PDFs through their available repository routes did not produce a readable full proof in this audit. The detailed five-stage description and the quoted entropy-cancellation passage therefore remain source-qualified supplied material.

Accordingly, Section sec:audit is an interface audit, not a claim that every line of the two external papers was checked. No omitted lemma, constant, or proof dependency is reconstructed from a summary.

The statement “no Lean note exists” is too broad to authenticate from the available evidence. The supported statement is narrower:

No complete, source-matched formalization certificate for 265-01 or 265-02 is supplied or authenticated here. The supplied description of Canonical265.lean concerns moment canonicalization in OAI.MUB6.Certificate.PairSemantics, not the lattice Hamiltonian theorem.

This is the provenance warning already recorded in the supplied Oai265-B material CheungOai265B. A numerical filename, an unrelated namespace, a scope note, or a formalization work item is not execution or coverage of the present theorem.