Documentary separation from the characteristic-map programme

The additional supplied excerpts concern a different analytic programme. Their internal kernels, distributional reconstruction maps, source weights, and characteristic loci are not the finite encoding $V$, network $W$, or channels of this paper.

The supplied records describe an internal amplitude construction at XIV-I's I2, a missing joint characteristic map at I3/J2, and technical relative-lifting interfaces in XV-B CheungXIVI,CheungXIVJ,CheungXVB. These attributions do not verify the full analytic manuscripts. In particular, the existence of the technical XV-B manuscript is distinct from opening the downstream admission exit.

The six remaining same-target obligations are retained as documentary obligations, not relabeled as finite-channel theorems:

No finite statistical theorem supplies any missing distributional operation in that chain. The supplied XVI-N obstruction has its own prepared-instance and route hypotheses CheungXVIN; it is not expanded into an obstruction for every model.

The standing documentary ledger is unchanged:

\boxed{
 \begin{gathered}
 \texttt{\detokenize{O.1}}:\ \texttt{\detokenize{NOT_CLOSED}},\\
 \text{series Route B: not discharged here},\\
 \text{XVI-N remaining obligations: not discharged here},\\
 \text{XV-B downstream admission exit: not opened},\\
 Q_HR_1^{(1)}\in\mathscr E_H:\ \text{not asserted}.
 \end{gathered}}

A source dependency, continuation path, or proposed comparison does not become a theorem premise merely through citation.