Manuscript Oai280-B@1 · Oai280-B.tex · theorem · 6d92ab75

Theorem: All ideal access channels and their optimal errors

Privacy, perfectness, and exact access-dependent recovery › Explicit accessible decoders · lines 559–634 · proof included or linked

Oai280-B@1#thm:idealaccess, Oai280-B@1#eq:DA, Oai280-B@1#eq:negative

Back to manuscript

For the encoding (eq:Vmatrix):

  1. If , then

    and

    satisfies .

  2. If , then

    and

  3. In the second case, the complement is nonconstant and is itself exactly recoverable. More explicitly,

Every assertion concerns the full logical qubit, including its reference entanglement.

Proof. For , the omitted set has size , so Lemma lem:privacy gives the complementary matrix-unit identities. Comparing their entries gives

Expanding in the omitted computational basis proves the first line of (eq:DA). The second line is the complete decoder in Theorem thm:exact; alternatively its traces add to , and direct substitution returns .

For , privacy makes the accessible channel replacement. Every subsequent decoder is therefore replacement by some state . On a Bell input its output is , whose Bell overlap is . The Bell-projector test gives error at least .

The decoder returning attains the bound. Indeed the completely depolarizing channel is

The triangle inequality gives , matching the Bell lower bound.

Finally , so the first part, with the roles interchanged, gives the displayed complement formula and its exact recovery. It cannot be constant because it recovers two distinct logical inputs.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • Oai280-B@1#eq:DA · line 570

  • Oai280-B@1#eq:negative · line 585

  • unlabeled · line 564

  • unlabeled · line 581

  • unlabeled · line 593

  • unlabeled · line 606

  • unlabeled · line 623

Nearby in this section