The susceptibility benchmark is separate

The supplied VII-H excerpt concerns a connected vacuum response of the Wick square, with a stated contact ambiguity $\mathbb{R}\hslash {\delta }_0$, and evaluates an invariant nonzero pairing CheungVIIH. Its response distribution is not $T_{\mu \nu }$, not $L$, and not the current insertion (eq:Cexplicit). We do not transfer its response prescription into the Ward calculation.

The relational lapse of Em02-E and the fixed-background emission law of Em03-A concern still different observables and geometries CheungEm02E,CheungEm03A. Neither is an improvement-scalar reconstruction or a verification of fixed-point hypotheses.