Why the free Ward construction does not supply the joint map

The retained analytic target in the supplied XIV-I/J record is a contraction of the complete internal sum

with grouped quantum cross-lines on tests meeting the characteristic locus. The symbol $L^{\mu ,I}$ appearing in that coordinate-response programme is not our improvement scalar $L=-Q/2$.

XIV-I's internal retarded-pole amplitude represents already defined internal lines. XIV-J's reference concerns only the supported sector

on the proved local complement of the characteristic locus. Neither is the required full six-branch contraction CheungXIVI,CheungXIVJ.

Our elementary insertion $\varphi (x)R(x-y)$ has independent coordinates and a directly defined tensor product. That simple existence argument has not been shown to apply to the different cross-line incidence of the inherited target. Similar words such as “retarded”, “contact”, “scalar”, or “Ward” do not identify these operations.