Manuscript Oai365-A@1 · Oai365-A.tex · section · a3840e3d
Cheung manuscript roles
Claim freeze, source status, and dependencies › Cheung manuscript roles · lines 159–188
The operational target and its acceptance discipline are documented in Cheung's XXII-A–F CheungXXIIA,CheungXXIIB,CheungXXIIC, CheungXXIID,CheungXXIIE,CheungXXIIF. We use the supplied identifiers and statements as comparisons. The proofs below establish their own interfaces.
In particular:
XXII-C uses a countably indexed family of separately tested tripartite processes. It is not one finite process with infinitely many event occurrences.
Instrument settings are not additional event occurrences. Experiment identifiers are not physical times or positions.
Strongly connected components yield a partial order, but neither a manifold nor a metric.
XXII-F proves a conditional implication. Its nonempty operational instantiation is a separate question.
En10-A and En10-B provide finite-estimation and physical-identification comparisons, not an already constructed boundary apparatus CheungEn10A,CheungEn10B.
The fact that source passages for En10-A are supplied with the present
question does not retroactively make the identifier
En10-A@1 a theorem premise of XXII-F. We re-prove the
elementary statistical statements used here.