The inherited characteristic quantum programme is separate

The supplied XIV-H/I/J and XV-B passages concern a different distributional construction CheungXIVH,CheungXIVI,CheungXIVJ,CheungXVB. None of the finite process matrices, Sobolev DN forms, or comparator transport channels constructed above is its complete characteristic graph.

For completeness, the elementary algebraic interface is: a linear candidate $\tilde{M}:P\to Y$ factors through a surjective reconstruction $\mathsf{Rec}:P\to K$ if and only if

Necessity follows by applying the factorization to a null presentation. For sufficiency, set $M(\mathsf{Rec}p)=\tilde{M}(p)$; the kernel condition gives well-definedness.

The identity

shows why highest polynomial presentation degree alone need not descend. It follows directly by testing against $\phi$:

This condition does not construct a missing distributional product.

Thus the supplied I2 internal-amplitude advance is not withdrawn, but the full I3/J2 map and its later admission chain are not completed. The technical XV-B manuscript may exist while its downstream quantum-admission exit remains unopened.

The conditional Route A obstruction in XVI-N is not changed. Its universal completion obligations and Route B are not discharged CheungXVIN. No conclusion here updates separately scoped bulk-sector statements in other manuscripts.