Manuscript OpenAI@2026-10-07 · OpenAI.tex · remark · 6a931f8f
Remark: Family 014. Restricted geometric Langlands, generic Ramanujan and Arthur parameters
Family claims › Number theory · lines 271–276
OpenAI@2026-10-07#rem:oai-014
Proves the restricted geometric Langlands equivalence for connected reductive groups on smooth projective connected curves over under the four stated Lie-theoretic characteristic hypotheses. Over arbitrary algebraically closed fields of characteristic , the same conclusion holds assuming additionally that is very good for the group and . Over global function fields, proves Ramanujan at every place for globally generic cuspidal representations of split adjoint absolutely simple exceptional groups, without characteristic or ramification-depth restrictions, and at every unramified place for cuspidal representations of split adjoint absolutely simple groups with a generic unramified component. Assuming the finite-level Ramanujan–Arthur decomposition, constructs global Arthur enhancements of occurring cuspidal excursion parameters for split connected semisimple groups at full finite level, recovering the given parameters by diagonal specialization on the entire Weil group, including inertia.
The authors are OpenAI. This companion does not verify the proof. The claim is not a theorem of the Enter series and not a premise of any registered sheet. It does not close O.1. O.1 stays NOT_CLOSED. It is not a de Sitter state and not the QdS external-leg scheme. No quantum coefficient is admitted. No compilation is asserted.
Nearby in this section
- remark: Remark: Family 001. Milne's rationality conjecture
- remark: Remark: Family 002. The full Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer formula in Selmer coranks zero and one
- remark: Remark: Family 003. The quasi-Riemann hypothesis
- remark: Remark: Family 004. Hilbert's tenth problem over Q
- remark: Remark: Family 005. Irrationality of Catalan's constant
- remark: Remark: Family 006. Goldfeld's conjecture
- remark: Remark: Family 007. Two-point Chowla and the corrected binary Elliott conjecture
- remark: Remark: Family 008. The Deligne–Drinfeld conjecture