Manuscript OpenAI@2026-10-07 · OpenAI.tex · remark · 6a931f8f
Remark: Family 175. Talagrand's conjectures and graph decompositions at expectation thresholds
Family claims › Combinatorics · lines 1213–1218
OpenAI@2026-10-07#rem:oai-175
Proves that integral and fractional expectation thresholds differ by at most a universal factor, and resolves Talagrand's discrete-convexity conjecture. An application proves the Ascoli–He–Park–Talagrand graph-decomposition conjecture: every graph's edges split into a universally bounded number of fixed pieces, each with containment threshold at most a universal constant times the original graph's integral expectation threshold. The pieces' embeddings need not agree on shared vertices.
The authors are OpenAI. This companion does not verify the proof. The claim is not a theorem of the Enter series and not a premise of any registered sheet. It does not close O.1. O.1 stays NOT_CLOSED. It is not a de Sitter state and not the QdS external-leg scheme. No quantum coefficient is admitted. No compilation is asserted.
Nearby in this section
- remark: Remark: Family 155. A counterexample to periodic tiling in dimension three
- remark: Remark: Family 156. Borsuk's conjecture fails in dimension nine
- remark: Remark: Family 157. Counterexamples to the Hadwiger and Colin de Verdi conjectures
- remark: Remark: Family 158. The Euclidean plane cannot be colored with five colors
- remark: Remark: Family 159. Erd (o)s's reciprocal-sum conjecture and quasipolynomial Szemerédi bounds
- remark: Remark: Family 160. Superexponential van der Waerden numbers
- remark: Remark: Family 161. Counterexamples to Sidorenko's conjecture and the forcing conjecture
- remark: Remark: Family 162. Counterexamples to Ryser's covering and Gyárfás's tree-cover conjectures