Manuscript Psy01-A@1 · Psy01-A.tex · example · 94477fa3

Example: A nonempty parameter class

Stress certificates and a conditional trade-off › An exactly solved selectivity–fragility comparison model · lines 1064–1077

Take

e_{0} = \frac{1}{2}, F = \frac{3}{4}, b_{0} = 0, k = λ = r = v_{0} = τ = 1, h_{0} = 2.

Then

e, f max \abs b (e, f) = \frac{15}{16}, h_{0} - r F = \frac{5}{4},

so the assumptions hold. Increasing $h_{0}$ strengthens endpoint cue use without changing the maximizing curve.

Displayed formulas in this passage

unlabeled · line 1066
$e_{0} = \frac{1}{2}, F = \frac{3}{4}, b_{0} = 0, k = λ = r = v_{0} = τ = 1, h_{0} = 2.$
unlabeled · line 1071
$e, f max \abs b (e, f) = \frac{15}{16}, h_{0} - r F = \frac{5}{4},$