Manuscript Psy01-A@1 · Psy01-A.tex · remark · 94477fa3

Remark: Random masks do not justify cue-column erasure

Cue utilization: valid certificates and a false threshold › A sparse counterexample · lines 619–629

Back to manuscript

For an independent Bernoulli retention mask with probability , and a first-layer cue block containing nonzero entries, the probability that the entire block is deleted is

This calculation does not apply to trained magnitude masks, but it demonstrates why independent-mask concentration is not a proof that ten-percent density removes all cue channels.

Displayed formulas in this passage

  • unlabeled · line 623

Nearby in this section