Manuscript Psy02-A@1 · Psy02-A.tex · section · d92ce402
Introduction and statement repair
Introduction and statement repair · lines 174–229
Psy02-A@1#tab:repairs
repairs to the proposed landmark incorporation.
| Proposed identification | Correct statement |
|---|---|
| Concentration replaces decoherence-time analysis | Concentration controls specified observable laws. A coherence or recovery witness needs its own dynamics and bound. |
| Residual number counts surviving degrees of freedom | is an excitation-number expectation in a declared residual frame. |
| Decoherence is input variation or detector noise | These are particular perturbation models. General environmental dynamics require a reduced channel or system–environment evolution. |
| A scalar field replaces a spin or dipole carrier | This is a surrogate choice unless an operational correspondence is proved for named states and observations. |
| Ordered Weyl expectations are sequential probabilities | Sequential probabilities require instruments. An ordered expectation need not be a joint characteristic function. |
| Contact ambiguity is residual-state variance | These concern different objects: response-distribution normalization and state-dependent moments. |
| A collapse timescale specifies a collapse model | A stochastic law, unconditional evolution, regularization, outcomes, and compatibility conditions must also be supplied. |
| Scheduled dependence identifies the mechanism | Scheduled ancestors bound possible influence. Mechanism identification requires separated accessible record laws. |
and novelty boundary. The Fock estimates and channel inequalities use standard methods. The contribution is their explicit assembly into a two-budget certification framework, together with counterexamples and interfaces that prevent invalid transfers between its modules. The finite reduction model is a declared regularized comparison model, not a derivation of a new physical collapse law.