Discussion and mathematical release

The pilot has a decisive restricted verdict: complete-law overlap prevents identification, while independently calibrated families with a positive retained detector gap admit a bounded-record test. The illustrative viability region is a mathematical design, not a biological sensitivity result. A loss of coherence does not uniquely identify gravity when another complete process reproduces the records.

The analytic revision adds enough definitions to verify its independent theorems without chasing release summaries: the fixed retarded pole, weighted Euler rule, smooth response, both root legs, tree wavefront argument, reconstruction, normal coefficients, correction obstruction, and conditional admission are all printed. It does not pretend that a parameterized interface is the complete component expansion of the inherited frozen model.

This distinction preserves rather than weakens the contribution: an outside reader can check what is proved, determine precisely what is assumed, and locate the sources needed for a stronger claim.