Manuscript Psy03-A@1 · Psy03-A.tex · section · b30eb6e9
Submission-level experiment protocol
Submission-level experiment protocol · lines 2766–2806
A computational application of the theorems should retain:
the supplied source snapshot and immutable baseline artifact;
data snapshots, labels, architecture, numerical precision, software versions, hardware, and determinism settings;
complete phase state, masks, activation, damping, and optimizer-reset policy;
named training-order, scoring, regrowth, input-noise, and hidden-noise streams;
layerwise integer deletion and regrowth counts, with a declared tie rule;
the complete intervention budget vector and separate training cost ledger;
all candidate configurations, including failed and unmatched ones, rather than only favorable matches;
acute, challenged, and modulation-removed checkpoints, with separate displacement and density labels;
an independent validation or simultaneous-selection procedure;
absolute post-challenge outcomes and paired degradation estimates;
repeated training seeds if claims concern training-procedure averages;
margins, operator norms, and implementation errors required by the claimed certificate.
A quantum application additionally requires:
a specified encoding and preparation class;
Hamiltonian and dissipator normalization, time interval, and accessible control class;
complete instruments and failure branches;
referenced channel or matrix-unit implementation certificates;
calibrated nuisance alternatives;
an explicit task and resource model before any advantage claim.
No complete biological correspondence dossier is supplied by the analytic construction.